Etoricoxib vs Aceclofenac in the Treatment of Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

October 28, 2019 updated by: Cheng-Chung Wei, Chung Shan Medical University

Comparison of Lower Dosage of Etoricoxib Versus Aceclofenac in the Treatment of Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Single-center, Parallel-group, Randomized Controlled Pilot Study

Comparison of lower dosage etoricoxib (60 mg daily) with aceclofenac (100 mg bid) for their efficacy and safety in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

This was a single medical center, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial, which conducted for eight weeks. In this study, 40 patients of RA were randomly assigned to two different treatment groups (etoricoxib and aceclofenac), and 20 patients were enrolled for each group. In addition to baseline data collection, objective assessment tools were used to evaluate for efficacy and safety. The primary endpoint was American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (ACR20) , secondary endpoints were the ACR 50,70, disease activity score 28 (DAS 28), European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria, the number of tender and swollen joints, physician's global assessment, patient's global assessment, pain scores, the short form health survey (SF-36) health Questionnaire and etc. In addition, all adverse reactions were recorded and all the results were analyzed in the intention to treat (ITT) manner.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Phase 4

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 78 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis as Rheumatoid Arthritis

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1. Pregnant or breast-feeding women. 2. Chemotherapy or radiation therapy in cancer patients

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Etoricoxib
Etoricoxib 60 mg QD
Etoricoxib 60 mg QD Oral
Other Names:
  • Arcoxia
Experimental: Aceclofenac
Aceclofenac 100 mg BID
Aceclofenac 100 mg BID Oral
Other Names:
  • TONEC

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (ACR20)
Time Frame: week 0, week 8
The investigators use ACR20 to compared the difference between the week 8 and week 0
week 0, week 8

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
American College of Rheumatology 50% improvement criteria (ACR50)
Time Frame: week 0, week 8
The investigators use ACR50 to compared the difference between the week 8 and week 0
week 0, week 8
American College of Rheumatology 70% improvement criteria (ACR70)
Time Frame: week 0, week 8
The investigators use ACR70 to compared the difference between the week 8 and week 0
week 0, week 8
Disease activity score 28 (DAS28)
Time Frame: week 0, week 8
The investigators use DAS28 to compared the difference between the week 8 and week 0
week 0, week 8
European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria
Time Frame: week 0, week 8
The investigators use EULAR responder rate to compared the difference between the week 8 and week 0
week 0, week 8
The number of tender and swollen joints
Time Frame: week 0, week 8
The investigators use the number of tender and swollen joints to compared the difference between the week 8 and week 0
week 0, week 8
Physician's global assessment (PhGA)
Time Frame: week 0, week 8
The investigators use PhGA to compared the difference between the week 8 and week 0
week 0, week 8
Patient's global assessment (PGA)
Time Frame: week 0, week 8
The investigators use PGA to compared the difference between the week 8 and week 0
week 0, week 8
Visual Analog Scale for pain (VAS)
Time Frame: week 0, week 8
The investigators use VAS to compared the difference between the week 8 and week 0
week 0, week 8
Quality of life by SF-36
Time Frame: week 0, week 8
The investigators use SF-36 to compared the difference between the week 8 and week 0
week 0, week 8

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 31, 2007

Study Completion (Actual)

July 31, 2007

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 28, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 28, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

October 30, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 30, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 28, 2019

Last Verified

October 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rheumatoid Arthritis

Clinical Trials on Etoricoxib

3
Subscribe