Liposomal Bupivacaine Versus Bupivacaine for for Postoperative Pain Control in Shoulder Surgery

February 28, 2022 updated by: Linda Demma, MD, PhD, Bassett Healthcare

Liposomal Bupivacaine Versus Bupivacaine for Interscalene Nerve Block for Postoperative Pain Control in Shoulder Arthroplasty/Arthroscopy: a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

This is a randomized, single blinded clinical trial whose purpose is to assess the impact of liposomal bupivacaine (LB) in a single shot interscalene nerve block compared with standard bupivacaine (same dose) in a single shot interscalene nerve block in terms of postoperative pain control. Specifically, outpatient pain scores,use of postoperative pain medicine and patient-reported functional outcomes after shoulder arthroplasty surgery will be evaluated.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Background:

Shoulder arthroplasty is the fastest growing joint replacement surgery in the United States, and optimal postoperative pain management is critical to optimize outcomes for these surgeries. LB has gained popularity for its potential to provide extended postoperative pain relief with possibly fewer side effects. LB (Exparel, Pacira Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Parsippany, NJ, USA) has recently gained popularity for its potential to provide extended postoperative pain relief and was recently approved by the FDA for use in interscalene nerve blocks. Several studies have investigated its efficacy after hip and knee arthroplasty and demonstrated efficacy with decreased opioid consumption, early mobilization, lower hospital costs, and shorter length of stay for patients undergoing surgeries such as bunionectomy, open colectomy, umbilical hernia repair, breast augmentation, and total knee arthroplasty. Limited studies have evaluated the efficacy of LB for perioperative pain control in shoulder arthroplasty. Hence, the objective of this study is to determine whether the use of an LB-based multimodal analgesic regimen provides better postoperative pain control and patient satisfaction, greater cost effectiveness, and lower risk profile compared with standard bupivacaine in interscalene nerve bloc

Study Design and Methods:

This will be a prospective, randomized, single blinded, controlled clinical trial comparing patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopy and arthroplasty treated with LB versus standard bupivacaine with a single bolus interscalene block. The block administrator will not be blinded. The patient and the staff members conducting the follow up assessments, phone calls, and data collection will be blinded to treatment assignment. Study drug administrators (anesthesiologists) will not be blinded. There will be at least one unblinded study coordinator who will not be involved in collecting outcome data.

Patients will be randomized in 1:1 ratio to LB or standard bupivacaine with a single bolus interscalene block. Patient will receive the assigned interscalene block preoperatively per usual procedure. The primary outcome, time to first post operative pain medication will be recorded either from the medical record if administered in the hospital or via telephone assessment if consumed outside the hospital. Study staff will contact the patient by phone post op day (POD) 1, 2, and 3 to assess pain levels, pain medication consumption, sleep, and adverse events. The total participation time for each patient will be approximately four days (operative day and POD 1,2,3).

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
85

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • New York
      • Cooperstown, New York, United States, 13326
        • Bassett Healthcare Network

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients aged 18 years or older
  • undergoing shoulder arthroscopy or arthroplasty
  • must meet the criteria for standard of care of ambulatory surgery patients per anesthesia guidelines issued by the American Society of Anesthesiologists

Exclusion criteria:

  • contraindications to regional anesthesia,
  • allergy to any component of multimodal analgesia
  • history of opioid use of >50 morphine milligram equivalents (MME) daily,
  • significant peripheral neuropathy or neurologic disorder affecting the upper extremity,
  • cognitive or psychiatric condition that might affect the patient?s assessment or inability to provide informed consent
  • pregnancy (this is an exclusion for surgery as well)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: liposomal bupivicaine
interscalene nerve block using liposomal bupivacaine (Exaprel) 10 ml mixed with 0.5% bupivacaine in same syringe - volume of bupivacaine per MD based on pt weight, etc but CANNOT EXCEED 13mL
Drug: interscalene nerve block
intra and post-operative analgesia
Other Names:
  • liposomal bupivicaine
Active Comparator: bupivicaine
interscalene block using standard bupivicaine (combination of ropivacaine 0.5% and lidocaine 2%) (volume per MD based on pt weight) + decadron
Drug: interscalene nerve block
intra and post-operative analgesia
Other Names:
  • liposomal bupivicaine

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to first post-operative pain medication consumption in minutes from discharge from OR
Time Frame: 72 hours
time to first post-operative pain medication
72 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Worst daily post-op pain on a scale 1-10
Time Frame: 72 hours
patient reported outcome of pain severity
72 hours
Least daily post-op pain on a scale 1-10
Time Frame: 72 hours
patient reported outcome of pain severity
72 hours
Average daily post-op pain on a scale 1-10
Time Frame: 72 hours
patient reported outcome of pain severity
72 hours
Total opioid use in morphine equivalents in the first 72 hours post-op
Time Frame: 72 hours
Total post-op opioid use
72 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Bassett Healthcare

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Linda Demma, MD, PhD, Bassett Healthcare

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 13, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 1, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 26, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 27, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 29, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 2, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 28, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 1422773

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

IPD will not be available to other researchers outside of the study investigators.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings