Evaluation of the Efficacy of 3M Dry Mouth Moisturizing Spray
An Evaluation of the Efficacy of 3M Dry Mouth Moisturizing Spray on the Relief of Dry Mouth Symptoms
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
Loma Linda, California, United States, 92350
- LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY, School of Dentistry
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Screening - Start of Wash-In Visit
- Subject who is ≥18 years of age and complains of dry mouth
- Only 1 subject per household is allowed into study
- Subject with a Challacombe scale score of 1 or higher
- Subject agrees to refrain from eating spicy foods and foods containing garlic beginning 48-hours prior to all study visits
- Subject agrees to eat a meal prior to all study visits that include sample evaluation in the clinic
- Subject agrees to not eat, drink, chew tobacco, chew gum, smoke, brush or floss teeth for 2-hours prior to sample evaluation study visits
- Subject agree to not use any oral care products and any type of breath mint or lozenges for 2-hours prior to sample evaluation study visits
- Subject agrees to refrain from any food and liquid during the 5-hour study visits except for what is provided by the study research staff (e.g., water and treatments A and B during evaluation periods)
- Subject agrees to only use those clinical oral care supplies provided during the entire study
- Able to understand and willing to sign the Informed Consent Form
Water Only Evaluation Visit
- Subject has successfully completed a ≥ 2-day wash-in period
- Subject has Challacombe scale score of 1 or higher
- Subject has refrained from eating spicy foods and foods containing garlic beginning 48-hours prior to the sample evaluation visits
- Subject ate a meal prior to sample evaluation study visits
- Subject has not eaten, drank, chewed tobacco, chewed gum, smoked, brushed or flossed teeth for 2-hours prior to sample evaluation study visits
- Subject has not used any oral care products, any type of breath mint or lozenges for 2-hours prior to sample evaluation study visits
- Subject agrees to refrain from any food and liquid during the 5-hour study visits except for what is provided by the study research staff (e.g., water and treatments A and B during evaluation periods)
- Subject has used only those clinical oral care supplies provided during study
Baseline Period 1/Randomization Visit
- Subject has successfully completed a ≥ 2-day wash-in period
- Subject has a Challacombe Scale score of 1 or higher
- Subject has refrained from eating spicy foods and foods containing garlic beginning 48-hours prior to sample evaluation study visits
- Subject ate a meal prior to sample evaluation study visits
- Subject has not eaten, drank, chewed tobacco, chewed gum, smoked, brushed or flossed teeth for 2-hours prior to sample evaluation study visits
- Subject has not used any oral care products and any type of breath mint or lozenges for 2-hours prior to sample evaluation study visits
- Subject agrees to refrain from any food and liquid during the 5-hour study visits except for what is provided by the study research staff (e.g., water and treatments A and B during evaluation periods)
- Subject has used only those clinical oral care supplies provided during study
Exclusion Criteria:
Subject Exclusion Criteria for Start of Wash-In, Water Only Evaluation and Baseline Period 1 (Randomization Visit)
- Subject has active mouth sores (e.g., cold sores, cuts, burns, canker sores)
- Subject has a life-threatening pathological condition
- Subject is participating in another clinical trial at the time of the study
- Subject has profound marginal periodontal disease (purulent exudate, tooth mobility, and/or extensive alveolar bone loss)
- Medical and oral conditions that, in the investigator's judgment, may compromise the subject's safety or interfere with the conduct and outcome of the study
- Difficult to be compliant with recalls, such as extensive travel commitments, lack of transportation etc.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: 3M Dry Mouth Moisturizing Spray
Dry mouth agent
|
20 ml bottle
44.3 ml bottle
|
|
Active Comparator: Biotene Moisturizing Mouth Spray
Dry mouth agent
|
20 ml bottle
44.3 ml bottle
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
10 cm Mouth Dryness Visual Analog Score
Time Frame: 15 minutes post dose
|
Primary endpoint will be paired-difference in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) between experimental and active control product.
On the scale 0 represents normal and 10 represents worst imaginable dry mouth symptoms.
|
15 minutes post dose
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
10 cm Mean Mouth Dryness Visual Analog Score
Time Frame: 240 minutes post dose
|
Mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) on the scale 0 represents normal and 10 represents worst imaginable dry mouth symptoms
|
240 minutes post dose
|
|
10 cm Mouth Dryness Visual Analog Score
Time Frame: 240 minutes
|
Paired-difference Visual Analog Scale (VAS) between both experimental and active control against water control.
The range of possible values is -10 to +10.
A negative value means is a better outcome than water.
A positive value means is a worse outcome than water.
|
240 minutes
|
|
10 cm Mean Mouth Dryness Visual Analog Score
Time Frame: 5 minutes
|
Mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) on the scale 0 represents normal and 10 represents worst imaginable dry mouth symptoms
|
5 minutes
|
|
10 cm Mean Mouth Dryness Visual Analog Scale
Time Frame: 30 minutes
|
Mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) on the scale 0 represents normal and 10 represents worst imaginable dry mouth symptoms
|
30 minutes
|
|
10 cm Mean Mouth Dryness Visual Analog Scale
Time Frame: 60 minutes
|
Mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) on the scale 0 represents normal and 10 represents worst imaginable dry mouth symptoms
|
60 minutes
|
|
10 cm Mean Mouth Dryness Visual Analog Scale
Time Frame: 120 minutes
|
Mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) on the scale 0 represents normal and 10 represents worst imaginable dry mouth symptoms
|
120 minutes
|
|
10 cm Mouth Dryness Visual Analog Scale
Time Frame: 5 minutes
|
Paired-difference Visual Analog Scale (VAS) between both experimental and active control against water control.
The range of possible values is -10 to +10.
A negative value means is a better outcome than water.
A positive value means is a worse outcome than water.
|
5 minutes
|
|
10 cm Mouth Dryness Visual Analog Scale
Time Frame: 15 minutes
|
Paired-difference Visual Analog Scale (VAS) between both experimental and active control against water control.
The range of possible values is -10 to +10.
A negative value means is a better outcome than water.
A positive value means is a worse outcome than water.
|
15 minutes
|
|
10 cm Mouth Dryness Visual Analog Scale
Time Frame: 30 minutes
|
Paired-difference Visual Analog Scale (VAS) between both experimental and active control against water control.
The range of possible values is -10 to +10.
A negative value means is a better outcome than water.
A positive value means is a worse outcome than water.
|
30 minutes
|
|
10 cm Mouth Dryness Visual Analog Score
Time Frame: 60 minutes
|
Paired-difference Visual Analog Scale (VAS) between both experimental and active control against water control.
The range of possible values is -10 to +10.
A negative value means is a better outcome than water.
A positive value means is a worse outcome than water.
|
60 minutes
|
|
10 cm Mouth Dryness Visual Analog Score
Time Frame: 120 minutes
|
Paired-difference Visual Analog Scale (VAS) between both experimental and active control against water control.
The range of possible values is -10 to +10.
A negative value means is a better outcome than water.
A positive value means is a worse outcome than water.
|
120 minutes
|
|
Response on Dry Mouth Relief
Time Frame: 5 minutes
|
Count of each category of the ordinal scale 0 = No Relief and 4 = Significant/Excellent
|
5 minutes
|
|
Response on Dry Mouth Relief
Time Frame: 15 minutes
|
Count of each category of the ordinal scale 0 = No Relief and 4 = Significant/Excellent
|
15 minutes
|
|
Response on Dry Mouth Relief
Time Frame: 30 minutes
|
Count of each category of the ordinal scale 0 = No Relief and 4 = Significant/Excellent
|
30 minutes
|
|
Response on Dry Mouth Relief
Time Frame: 60 minutes
|
Count of each category of the ordinal scale 0 = No Relief and 4 = Significant/Excellent
|
60 minutes
|
|
Response on Dry Mouth Relief
Time Frame: 120 minutes
|
Count of each category of the ordinal scale 0 = No Relief and 4 = Significant/Excellent
|
120 minutes
|
|
Response on Dry Mouth Relief
Time Frame: 240 minutes
|
Count of each category of the ordinal scale 0 = No Relief and 4 = Significant/Excellent
|
240 minutes
|
|
Response to Effectively Lubricates the Mouth
Time Frame: 5 minutes
|
5 point ordinal scale 1 = Poor and 5 = Excellent
|
5 minutes
|
|
Response to Effectively Lubricates the Mouth
Time Frame: 15 minutes
|
5 point ordinal scale 1 = Poor and 5 = Excellent
|
15 minutes
|
|
Response to Effectively Lubricates the Mouth
Time Frame: 30 minutes
|
5 point ordinal scale 1 = Poor and 5 = Excellent
|
30 minutes
|
|
Response to Effectively Lubricates the Mouth
Time Frame: 60 minutes
|
5 point ordinal scale 1 = Poor and 5 = Excellent
|
60 minutes
|
|
Response to Effectively Lubricates the Mouth
Time Frame: 120 minutes
|
5 point ordinal scale 1 = Poor and 5 = Excellent
|
120 minutes
|
|
Response to Effectively Lubricates the Mouth
Time Frame: 240 minutes
|
5 point ordinal scale 1 = Poor and 5 = Excellent
|
240 minutes
|
|
Response to Feel Comfortable in the Mouth
Time Frame: 5 minutes
|
5 point ordinal scale 1 = Poor and 5 = Excellent
|
5 minutes
|
|
Response to Feel Comfortable in the Mouth
Time Frame: 15 minutes
|
5 point ordinal scale 1 = Poor and 5 = Excellent
|
15 minutes
|
|
Response to Feel Comfortable in the Mouth
Time Frame: 30 minutes
|
5 point ordinal scale 1 = Poor and 5 = Excellent
|
30 minutes
|
|
Response to Feel Comfortable in the Mouth
Time Frame: 60 minutes
|
5 point ordinal scale 1 = Poor and 5 = Excellent
|
60 minutes
|
|
Response to Feel Comfortable in the Mouth
Time Frame: 120 minutes
|
5 point ordinal scale 1 = Poor and 5 = Excellent
|
120 minutes
|
|
Response to Feel Comfortable in the Mouth
Time Frame: 240 minutes
|
5 point ordinal scale 1 = Poor and 5 = Excellent
|
240 minutes
|
|
Response to Soothing in the Mouth
Time Frame: 5 minutes
|
5 point ordinal scale 1 = Poor and 5 = Excellent
|
5 minutes
|
|
Response to Soothing in the Mouth
Time Frame: 15 minutes
|
5 point ordinal scale 1 = Poor and 5 = Excellent
|
15 minutes
|
|
Response to Soothing in the Mouth
Time Frame: 30 minutes
|
5 point ordinal scale 1 = Poor and 5 = Excellent
|
30 minutes
|
|
Response to Soothing in the Mouth
Time Frame: 60 minutes
|
5 point ordinal scale 1 = Poor and 5 = Excellent
|
60 minutes
|
|
Response to Soothing in the Mouth
Time Frame: 120 minutes
|
5 point ordinal scale 1 = Poor and 5 = Excellent
|
120 minutes
|
|
Response to Soothing in the Mouth
Time Frame: 240 minutes
|
5 point ordinal scale 1 = Poor and 5 = Excellent
|
240 minutes
|
|
Response to Effectively Moistens the Mouth
Time Frame: 5 minutes
|
5 point ordinal scale 1 = Poor and 5 = Excellent
|
5 minutes
|
|
Response to Effectively Moistens the Mouth
Time Frame: 15 minutes
|
5 point ordinal scale 1 = Poor and 5 = Excellent
|
15 minutes
|
|
Response to Effectively Moistens the Mouth
Time Frame: 30 minutes
|
5 point ordinal scale 1 = Poor and 5 = Excellent
|
30 minutes
|
|
Response to Effectively Moistens the Mouth
Time Frame: 60 minutes
|
5 point ordinal scale 1 = Poor and 5 = Excellent
|
60 minutes
|
|
Response to Effectively Moistens the Mouth
Time Frame: 120 minutes
|
5 point ordinal scale 1 = Poor and 5 = Excellent
|
120 minutes
|
|
Response to Effectively Moistens the Mouth
Time Frame: 240 minutes
|
5 point ordinal scale 1 = Poor and 5 = Excellent
|
240 minutes
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Yiming Li, DDS,MSD,PhD, LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY, School of Dentistry
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Locker D. Xerostomia in older adults: a longitudinal study. Gerodontology. 1995 Jul;12(1):18-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-2358.1995.tb00125.x.
- Fox PC. Management of dry mouth. Dent Clin North Am. 1997 Oct;41(4):863-75.
- Guijarro Guijarro B, Lopez Sanchez AF, Hernandez Vallejo G. Treatment of xerostomia. A review. Med Oral. 2001 Jan-Feb;6(1):7-18. English, Spanish.
- Fontana M, Zunt S, Eckert GJ, Zero D. A screening test for unstimulated salivary flow measurement. Oper Dent. 2005 Jan-Feb;30(1):3-8.
- Andersson G, Johansson G, Attstrom R, Edwardsson S, Glantz PO, Larsson K. Comparison of the effect of the linseed extract Salinum and a methyl cellulose preparation on the symptoms of dry mouth. Gerodontology. 1995 Jul;12(1):12-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-2358.1995.tb00124.x.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- EM-11-050038
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.