A Study of Eltrombopag and Recombinant Human Thrombopoietin In Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia

October 17, 2020 updated by: Xiao Hui Zhang, Peking University People's Hospital

A Prospective Observational Study of Switching Eltrombopag and Recombinant Human Thrombopoietin In Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia

Thrombopoietin Receptor Agonists (TPO-ra) are novel treatments for patients with refractory Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP). Rh-TPO and eltrombopag increase the number of platelets through different mechanism. If there is cross-resistance between 2 drugs for the treatment of adult ITP is still no answer. The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of switching eltrombopag and Rh-TPO in adults with ITP.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Non-interventional study. Patients who fail previous steroids and receive rh-TPO and then switch to EPAG or vice versa will be enrolled. The reason for switch will be recorded. Patients in the rh-TPO group were given rh-TPO 300 U/kg once daily for 21 days, and those in the eltrombopag group were given eltrombopag 50mg once daily for 6 weeks. Rh-TPO and eltrombopag were terminated any time the platelet counts increased above 100 × 10^9/L in the rh-TPO group and 300 × 10^9/L in the eltrombopag group. The efficacy, safety, and patient/physician preference will be assessed and compared between the two agents.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100044
        • Peking University Institute of Hematology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 71 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

adult ITP patients

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

1.18 years or older

2.Primary ITP

3.Platelet count ≤ 30 × 109/l

4.Normal neutrophils, reticulocyte count, creatinine and liver enzyme values

5.Available follow-up of 2 months at least for each period

6.Failed initial glucocorticosteroid treatment

7.Unwillingness to accept splenectomy or failed splenectomy

-

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. HIV, hepatitis B or C, Helicobacter pylori infection
  2. Malignancy
  3. Congenital or acquired immunologic deficit
  4. History of thrombosis plus two or more risk factors
  5. Nursing or pregnant women
  6. Abnormal liver and renal functions: AST/ALT/total bilirubin ≥1.5 × ULN, creatinine ≥1.5 mg/dl
  7. Severe heart and lung dysfunctions -

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Recombinant human thrombopoietin (rh-TPO) group
Patients who fail previous steroids and eltrombopag and then switch to Rh-TPO will be enrolled. The reason for switch will be recorded. Patients will be given rh-TPO 300 U/kg once daily for 21 days. Rh-TPO will be terminated any time the platelet counts increased above 100 × 10^9/L. The efficacy, safety, and patient/physician preference will be assessed.
Drug: Recombinant human thrombopoietin (rh-TPO)
Patients will be given rh-TPO 300 U/kg once daily for 21 days.
Eltrombopag group
Patients who fail previous steroids and rh-TPO and then switch to eltrombopag will be enrolled. The reason for switch will be recorded. Patients will be given eltrombopag 50mg once daily for 6 weeks. Eltrombopag will be terminated any time the platelet counts increased above 300× 10^9/L.The efficacy, safety, and patient/physician preference will be assessed.
Drug: Eltrombopag
Patients will be given eltrombopag 50mg once daily for 6 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Response Rate at 6 Weeks After Switching
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The percentage of patients who have reached platelet count ≥ 50×10^9/L at 6 weeks after switching.
6 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Treatments Associated Adverse Events
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Adverse event/serious adverse event associated with study drugs during 6 weeks after switching
6 weeks
Reasons of Switching
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Reasons of switching eltrombopag and rh-TPO will be recorded, including lack of efficacy, patient preference, side effects, platelet count fluctuation
6 weeks
Number of Participants With Bleeding Events
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Number of participants with bleeding events of the two groups during 6 weeks after switching
6 weeks
TOR (Time to Response)
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The time to achieve platelet count ≥ 50×10^9/L after switching.
6 weeks
DOR (Duration of Response)
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The duration of achieving platelet count ≥ 50×10^9/L after switching.
6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Peking University People's Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Xiao Hui Zhang, MD, Peking University People's Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 28, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 28, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 2, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 20, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 17, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • ZXH-ITP2019

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings