Efficacy and Safety of Niraparib Combined With Oral Etoposide in Platinum Resistant/Refractory Recurrent Ovarian Cancer

August 27, 2021 updated by: Peking Union Medical College Hospital

A Single Arm, Prospective, Multicenter, Phase II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Niraparib Combined With Oral Etoposide in Platinum Resistant/ Refractory Recurrent Ovarian Cancer

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of niraparib combined with oral etoposide in platinum resistant or platinum refractory recurrent ovarian cancer.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is a single arm, prospective, multicenter, phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PARP inhibitor niraparib combined with oral etoposide chemotherapy in women with platinum resistant or refractory recurrent ovarian cancer. Subjects will receive niraparib and oral etoposide in 30-day treatment cycles. After 6-8 cycles, oral etoposide will be discontinued. Subjects will receive niraparib alone until disease progression, intolerable toxicity or withdrawal of informed consent. The primary endpoint is progression free survival evaluated by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST v1.1). Secondary endpoints include overall response rate , duration of response, disease control rate, CA125 response rate and safety.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
36

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • China
      • Beijing, China
        • Recruiting
        • Peking Union Medical College Hospital
        • Contact:
      • Jinan, China
        • Recruiting
        • Shandong Cancer Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Depu Zhang

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 66 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Signed informed consent before undertaking any study procedure.
  • Female, age 18-70.
  • Histologically confirmed FIGO stage III or IV non-mucinous epithelial ovarian cancer, fallopian tube cancer, or primary peritoneal cancer.
  • No limitation of the BRCA mutation and HRD status.
  • Platinum resistant or refractory recurrent disease.
  • Subjects must have received at least 1 prior line of platinum-based chemotherapy regimen and no more than twice.
  • Subjects must have measurable lesions with imaging evidence of disease progression (according to RECIST1.1 criteria); or without measurable/evaluable lesion (RECIST 1.1 criteria), but two consecutive cases of elevated CA125 > 2 times the upper limit of normal (> 70 U/ml) were detected.
  • Life expectancy of more than 6 months.
  • ECOG 0-1.

  • Good organ function, including:

    • Bone marrow function: neutrophil count ≥1,500/µL, platelets ≥100,000/µL, hemoglobin ≥10 g/dL;
    • Hepatic function: total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN) or direct bilirubin ≤1.0 x ULN, AST and ALT ≤2.5 x ULN unless liver metastases are present, in which case they must be ≤5 x ULN;
    • Renal function: serum creatinine ≤1.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN) or calculated creatinine clearance ≥60 mL/min using the Cockcroft-Gault equation.

  • Has a negative serum pregnancy test within 3 days prior to taking study treatment if of childbearing potential and agrees to abstain from activities that could result in pregnancy from screening through 3 months after the last dose of study treatment, or is of non-childbearing potential. Non-childbearing potential is defined as follows (by other than medical reasons):

    • ≥45 years and <60 years of age and has not had menses for >1 year
    • ≥60 years of age
    • Post-hysterectomy, post-bilateral oophorectomy, or post-tubal ligation.
  • Is able to adhere to the protocol.
  • Has recovered from previous chemotherapy induced toxic side effects to ≤ grade 1 CTCAE or basal level, apart from ≤ grade 2 CTCAE peripheral neuropathy or hair loss symptoms at steady state.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Has a known hypersensitivity to the active or inactive ingredients of niraparib or compound which has similar chemical structure to niraparib.
  • Has a known hypersensitivity to the active or inactive ingredients of etoposide or compound which has similar chemical structure to etoposide.
  • prior PARP inhibitor therapy.
  • Has symptomatic uncontrolled brain or leptomeningeal metastasis.
  • Major surgery or chemotherapy within 3 weeks of starting the study or patient has not recovered from any effects of the surgery.
  • Receive palliative radiotherapy encompassing > 20% of the bone marrow within 1 week of entering the study.
  • Be diagnosed any invasive cancer other than ovarian cancer (apart from cured basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma) within 2 years prior to study enrolment.
  • Previously or currently diagnosed of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML).
  • Has other serious or uncontrolled disease.
  • Has any disease, treatment and laboratory abnormality that may interfere the study results and affect the fully attendance of study. Or the subject is considered to be not suitable for the study by the investigator. Cannot receive platelet or red blood cell transfusion within 4 weeks of study drug administration.
  • Pregnant, breastfeeding or expecting to conceive children during the study treatment period.
  • Adjusted for QT interval (QTc) >470 msec.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Niparib combined with oral etoposide
Subjects will received niraparib 200mg or 100mg alternate once daily and oral etoposide 50mg on day 1-20 of a 30-day cycle. Oral etoposide was administered for a maximum of 6-8 cycles. Treatment was continued until disease progression, patient withdrawal or unacceptable toxic effects.
Drug: Niraparib
Subjects will receive niraparib combined with oral etoposide (on day 1-20, every 30 days). After 6-8 cycles, oral etoposide will be terminated. Niraparib will be still given to subjects until disease progression, intolerable toxicity or withdrawal of informed consent.
Other Names:
  • oral etoposide

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
PFS is defined as the time from randomization to first disease progression by investigator assessment using RECIST 1.1 or death, from any cause, whichever comes first.
Through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Duration of Response (DOR)
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
DOR is defined as the time from the first date of response until the date of first documented progression.
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
ORR is defined as the proportion of subjects who have a partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) to therapy according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1.
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Disease Control Rate (DCR)
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
DCR is defined as the proportion of subjects who have a complete response (CR), partial response (PR) and stable disease (SD) to therapy according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1.
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
CA125 Response Rate
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
The proportion of subjects with a minimum 50% reduction in CA-125 serum levels lasting for ≥28 days relative to baseline CA-125 serum levels.
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
The frequency and severity of adverse events
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
The frequency and severity of adverse events evaluated according to NCI CTCAE version 5.0 during subjects receiving the study treatment.
Through study completion, an average of 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Peking Union Medical College Hospital

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Zai Lab (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 21, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 9, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 1, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 3, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 1, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 27, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CH1902001

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings