Comparison Between Two Rates of Activation of Miniscrew-Supported Upper Jaw Expander in Adolescents
Comparison Between Two Activation Protocols of Miniscrew-Supported Maxillary Expander in Adolescents: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Transverse maxillary deficiency is one of the problems that are commonly encountered in the orthodontic practice. Miniscrew-supported maxillary expansion represents a promising modality for the treatment of transverse maxillary deficiency. However, controversies still exist regarding the activation protocol. One of these controversies is whether using a slow activation protocol would be more beneficial to the patients compared to a rapid activation protocol. Another question that consequently ensues is whether such activation protocol would result in less pain compared to the rapid activation protocol.
The null hypothesis of the current study is that there is no difference between slow and rapid activation protocols of miniscrew-supported expander.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Alexandria, Egypt
- Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Permanent dentition.
- Participants indicated for skeletal maxillary expansion due to unilateral or bilateral posterior cross bite or maxillary transverse deficiency
- Good oral hygiene
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of previous orthodontic or orthopedic treatment
- History of maxillary trauma
- Patients with congenital craniofacial malformations
- Patients receiving pharmacological agents or having systemic diseases that might affect the bone metabolism or the pain response
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: SINGLE
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Slow maxillary expansion
The miniscrew-supported maxillary expander is activated by turning the expansion screw once every other day.
|
A maxillary expander is supported on 4 palatal miniscrews.
The appliance is activated slowly by turning the expansion screw once every other day to correct the transverse maxillary deficiency.
|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Rapid maxillary expansion
The miniscrew-supported maxillary expander is activated by turning the expansion screw twice daily.
|
A maxillary expander is supported on 4 palatal miniscrews.
The appliance is activated rapidly by turning the expansion screw twice per day to correct the transverse maxillary deficiency.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Transverse skeletal changes from baseline to an average of 5 months after the initial activation, measured using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)
Time Frame: At baseline and an average of 5 months after the initial activation
|
The data from CBCT scans at the different time points will be exported in Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) format and processed using suitable software.
The relevant landmarks will be defined and located by the investigator to measure the transverse skeletal changes in mm from baseline to the end of passive retention of the expansion.
|
At baseline and an average of 5 months after the initial activation
|
|
Dento-alveolar inclination changes from baseline to an average of 5 months after the initial activation, measured using CBCT
Time Frame: At baseline and an average of 5 months after the initial activation
|
The data from CBCT scans at the different time points will be exported in DICOM format and processed using suitable software.
The relevant landmarks will be defined and located by the investigator to measure the changes in dento-alveolar inclination from baseline to the end of passive retention of the expansion.
|
At baseline and an average of 5 months after the initial activation
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain score on Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at baseline
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Measures pain and how it affects the daily activities on a NRS where each respondent selects a whole number, between 0 and 10, with 0 being the lowest extreme and 10 being the highest extreme.
|
Baseline
|
|
Pain score on NRS after the first activation of the maxillary expander
Time Frame: On day 1 after the first activation of the maxillary expander
|
Measures pain and how it affects the daily activities on a NRS where each respondent selects a whole number, between 0 and 10, with 0 being the lowest extreme and 10 being the highest extreme.
|
On day 1 after the first activation of the maxillary expander
|
|
Pain score on NRS after 1 week of activation of the maxillary expander
Time Frame: After 1 week of activation of the maxillary expander
|
Measures pain and how it affects the daily activities on a NRS where each respondent selects a whole number, between 0 and 10, with 0 being the lowest extreme and 10 being the highest extreme.
|
After 1 week of activation of the maxillary expander
|
|
Pain score on NRS after the last activation of the maxillary expander
Time Frame: At the end of active expansion (an estimated average of 2 to 3 weeks in the rapid expansion group, and 7 to 12 weeks in the slow expansion group)
|
Measures pain and how it affects the daily activities on a NRS where each respondent selects a whole number, between 0 and 10, with 0 being the lowest extreme and 10 being the highest extreme.
|
At the end of active expansion (an estimated average of 2 to 3 weeks in the rapid expansion group, and 7 to 12 weeks in the slow expansion group)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Yomna M Yacout, BDS, MSc, Alexandria University
- Study Chair: Nadia M El Harouni, BDS,MSc,PhD, Alexandria University
- Study Chair: Essam M Abdallah, BDS,MSc,PhD, Alexandria University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Lin L, Ahn HW, Kim SJ, Moon SC, Kim SH, Nelson G. Tooth-borne vs bone-borne rapid maxillary expanders in late adolescence. Angle Orthod. 2015 Mar;85(2):253-62. doi: 10.2319/030514-156.1. Epub 2014 Dec 9.
- Yilmaz A, Arman-Ozcirpici A, Erken S, Polat-Ozsoy O. Comparison of short-term effects of mini-implant-supported maxillary expansion appliance with two conventional expansion protocols. Eur J Orthod. 2015 Oct;37(5):556-64. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cju094. Epub 2015 Jan 6.
- Lagravere MO, Carey J, Heo G, Toogood RW, Major PW. Transverse, vertical, and anteroposterior changes from bone-anchored maxillary expansion vs traditional rapid maxillary expansion: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Mar;137(3):304.e1-12; discussion 304-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.09.016.
- Algharbi M, Bazargani F, Dimberg L. Do different maxillary expansion appliances influence the outcomes of the treatment? Eur J Orthod. 2018 Jan 23;40(1):97-106. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjx035.
- Carvalho Trojan L, Andres Gonzalez-Torres L, Claudia Moreira Melo A, Barbosa de Las Casas E. Stresses and Strains Analysis Using Different Palatal Expander Appliances in Upper Jaw and Midpalatal Suture. Artif Organs. 2017 Jun;41(6):E41-E51. doi: 10.1111/aor.12817. Epub 2016 Dec 7.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Study Start
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 01012019
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Malocclusion
-
NCT07162753RecruitingClass II Div 1 Malocclusion | Class III Malocclusion | Class II Division 2 Malocclusion | Class I Malocclusion
-
NCT07466641RecruitingBimaxillary Protrusion | Malocclusion, Angle Class II, Division 1 | Class I Malocclusion
-
NCT07404696Not yet recruitingClass II Malocclusion | Class II Malocclusion, Division 1 | Overjet
-
NCT07179354CompletedClass III Skeletal Malocclusion
-
NCT07405905Recruiting
-
NCT07383259Not yet recruiting
-
NCT07454694CompletedClass II Malocclusion | Mandibular Retrognathism
-
NCT07243509CompletedCLASS II DIVISION 1 MALOCCLUSION
-
NCT04376190Completed
-
NCT06609733CompletedCLASS II DIVISION 1 MALOCCLUSION
Clinical Trials on Miniscrew-Supported Maxillary Expander- Slow activation
-
NCT07404488Completed
-
NCT05135962Not yet recruitingMaxillary Deficiency
-
NCT07117006Active, not recruitingOpen Bite | Clear Aligner Appliance | Skeletal Open Bite | Maxillary Intrusion | Mini-screws
-
NCT03667508Completed