Application of Plasma Circulating HPV DNA Testing to Management of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia

November 13, 2024 updated by: UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center

Application of Plasma Circulating Human Papillomavirus (HPV) DNA Testing to Management of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia

The purpose of this study is to see if circulating HPV DNA (cHPVDNA) can be used as a noninvasive biomarker for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2-3 in hopes of reducing procedures and costs for patients, as well as personalize their treatment plan.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

cHPVDNA is detectable in plasma of patients with invasive disease and CIN 1-3, and with the development of a highly sensitive and specific droplet digital Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) assay, it is hoped to be identified more prevalently and thus can improve risk stratification and help produce personalized treatment decisions and may be more cost-efficient. Plasma samples and cervical swabs will be collected from patients in University of North Carolina (UNC) Gynecology clinics, and some patients will also provide a urine sample. Those receiving biopsies or colposcopies and will come back to clinic 2-4 weeks post-excision for collection of another blood specimen. Using plasma samples and pathology results, we will characterize the relationship between plasma cHPVDNA levels and 1) CIN 1 versus CIN 2-3 pathology 2) CIN 2-3 pre-excision and 2-4 weeks post-excision. We will accrue three cohorts of 25, 30, 30 patients corresponding to 1) Control 2) CIN 1 3) CIN 2-3. The control cohort will establish background signal in the assay. We will compare the proportion of detectable cHPVDNA levels between CIN 1 and CIN 2-3 cohorts using Fisher's exact test with 80% power, significance level of 10%. Paired t-test will be used to compare pre- and post-excision cHPVDNA levels.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
145

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • North Carolina
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27599
        • Tuvara Jenene King

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 99 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Women ≥ 18 years old who are presenting to UNC Gynecology clinics with or without dysplasia and may or may not need colposcopy, biopsy, or lesion excisions.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • No history of previously treated cervical cancer
  • Subject is willing and able to comply with study procedures based on the judgement of the investigator or protocol designee

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Women who are pregnant or nursing

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Control
Negative high risk (HR)-HPV, cytology co-test
Diagnostic test: digital PCR (dPCR) assay
It is a highly sensitive and specific droplet digital PCR assay for absolute quantification of circulating tumor HPV DNA for the most prevalent HPV types that will determine if a woman has cHPVDNA
CIN 1
Biopsy with low grade dysplasia
Diagnostic test: digital PCR (dPCR) assay
It is a highly sensitive and specific droplet digital PCR assay for absolute quantification of circulating tumor HPV DNA for the most prevalent HPV types that will determine if a woman has cHPVDNA
CIN 2-3
Biopsy with high grade dysplasia
Diagnostic test: digital PCR (dPCR) assay
It is a highly sensitive and specific droplet digital PCR assay for absolute quantification of circulating tumor HPV DNA for the most prevalent HPV types that will determine if a woman has cHPVDNA

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Relationship between plasma cHPVDNA levels and presence of CIN 2-3 histopathology
Time Frame: Baseline
We will quantify cHPVDNA levels in blood plasma from patients with normal screening, CIN 1, and CIN 2-3 cervical disease prior to treatment.
Baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in cHPVDNA levels following excisional therapy for CIN 2-3 cervical disease.
Time Frame: 2-4 weeks post-excision
For patients who undergo excisional therapy, we will collect bio-specimens and quantify cHPVDNA levels in plasma during their post-procedure visit.
2-4 weeks post-excision

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Shivani Sud, MD, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 26, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 26, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 15, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 14, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 14, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 18, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 14, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 13, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • LCCC 1928

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings