Meals MATTER: A Trial of Medically Tailored Meals 2 Weeks vs. 4 Weeks Post Hospital Discharge
Meals MATTER: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Medically Tailored Meals 2 Weeks vs. 4 Weeks Post Hospital Discharge
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The purpose of this study is to determine if medically tailored meals provided for either 2 weeks or 4 weeks (1 meal per day) to a Kaiser Permanente Colorado (KPCO) member after hospital discharge will improve their health. Medically tailored meals (MTM) are meals that are approved by a dietitian and shown to help people with certain health conditions.
The Investigators propose a research study with four Specific Aims:
Specific Aim 1: To determine if MTM provided post hospitalization for 4 weeks to patients with one or more of seven chronic health conditions will decrease depression/anxiety measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at 60 days in comparison to meals provided for 2 weeks to members discharged from two hospitals.
Hypothesis 1: Patients receiving meals for 4 weeks will have a clinically significant increase in their HADS score at 60 days compared to those receiving meals for 2 weeks.
Specific Aim 2: To determine if MTM provided for 4 weeks to patients with one or more of seven chronic health conditions post hospitalization will improve general well-being and functional status measured by Katz's Activities of Daily Living (ADL).
Hypothesis 2: Patients receiving meals for 4 weeks will have a clinically significant increase in their sense of well-being and ADLs at 60 days compared to those receiving meals for 2 weeks.
Specific Aim 3: To determine if MTM provided for 4 weeks to patients with one or more of seven chronic health conditions post hospitalization will decrease a composite outcome of rehospitalizations and emergency department (ED) visits at 60 days in comparison to: a) meals provided for 2 weeks to members discharged from two hospitals; and b) a concurrent prospective control group not receiving meals at two other KPCO-contracted hospitals.
Hypothesis 3: Patients receiving meals for 4 weeks will have a decreased composite rate of rehospitalizations and ED visits at 60 days compared to those receiving meals for 2 weeks or the non-randomized control group.
Specific Aim 4: To determine the feasibility, acceptability and scalability of the Meals Matter Program to KP members, their households, and hospital leadership and staff.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Colorado
-
Denver, Colorado, United States, 80218
- St Joseph's Hospital
-
Lafayette, Colorado, United States, 80026
- Good Samaritan Medical Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 18 or older, with no upper age limit
- Hospitalized at Saint Joseph Hospital or Good Samaritan Medical Center with the anticipation that they will be discharged home
- Member of a KP health plan
Have one or more of the following conditions:
- Heart failure
- Cancer
- End-stage renal disease (ESRD)/chronic renal disease
- Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
- Diabetes Mellitus
- Chronic liver disease/cirrhosis
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patient discharged to a nursing home, an assisted living facility, or another setting where meals are institutionally provided
- Patient has a health condition which is incompatible with the diet choices offered by Project Angel Heart (PAH - food service vendor)
- Patient refuses the type of meal best for their medical condition
- Patient has dementia
- Patient is pregnant or hospitalized peri-partum
- Patient is an active participant in a PAH program or another meal program
- Patient is unable to speak English or Spanish
- PAH unable to deliver meals due to patient not being in PAH service area
- Patient was discharged from the hospital within 24 hours of admission
- Patient whose household member has enrolled in the Meals MATTER study
- Patient discharged to hospice care
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Meals - 2 weeks
Receive meal delivery for 2 weeks (1 meal per day for a total of 14 days).
The medically tailored meal ordered for each participant will depend on their medical conditions.
|
Compare 2 and 4 weeks of meal delivery
|
|
Active Comparator: Meals - 4 weeks
Receive meal delivery for 4 weeks (1 meal per day for a total of 28 days).
The medically tailored meal ordered for each participant will depend on their medical conditions.
|
Compare 2 and 4 weeks of meal delivery
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Anxiety and Depression measured through the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
Time Frame: A change in score from baseline to 60 days
|
Measured through the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.
0 = Minimum.
21 = Maximum.
Higher score is worse outcome.
|
A change in score from baseline to 60 days
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Functional Status measured through the Katz Activities of Daily Living Scale
Time Frame: A change in score from baseline to 60 days
|
Measured through the Katz Activities of Daily Living.
Minimum = 0, Maximum = 6.
Higher score is better outcome.
|
A change in score from baseline to 60 days
|
|
Re-hospitalization and Emergency Department Visits
Time Frame: 60 days from hospital discharge
|
Measured through time of discharge through re-hospitalization or Emergency Department visit
|
60 days from hospital discharge
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Rebecca S Boxer, MD, MS, KP Institute for Health Research
- Study Director: John Steiner, MD, MPH, KP Institute for Health Research
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- IRB-1556587
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.