Phone-based Intervention Under Nurse Guidance After Stroke 2

January 14, 2026 updated by: Bruce Ovbiagele, Northern California Institute of Research and Education
The overall objective of Phone-based Intervention under Nurse Guidance after Stroke II (PINGS-2) is to deploy a hybrid study design to firstly, demonstrate the efficacy of a theoretical-model-based, mHealth technology-centered, nurse-led, multi-level integrated approach to substantially improve longer term BP control among 500 recent stroke patients encountered at 10 hospitals in Ghana. Secondly, PINGS II seeks to develop an implementation strategy for routine integration and policy adoption of mhealth for post-stroke BP control in a LMIC setting. The investigators will leverage experience gained from the NIH Global Brain Disorders funded R21 pilot study (NS094033) to test efficacy of a refined, culturally-tailored, and potentially implementable intervention aimed at addressing the premier modifiable risk for stroke & other key variables in an under-resourced system burdened by suboptimal care & outcomes.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
500

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Ghana
      • Aboaso, Ghana
        • Ankaase Methodist Hospital
      • Accra, Ghana
        • Korle Bu Teaching Hospital
      • Agogo, Ghana
        • Agogo Presbyterian Hospital
      • Cape Coast, Ghana
        • Cape Coast Teaching Hospital
      • Kumasi, Ghana
        • Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital
      • Kumasi, Ghana
        • Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology
      • Kumasi, Ghana
        • Kumasi South Hospital
      • Kumasi, Ghana
        • Kwadaso SDA Hospital
      • Kumasi, Ghana
        • Manhyia Government Hospital
      • Kumasi, Ghana
        • Tafo Government Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 100 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age ≥ 18 years (stroke is commoner above this age cut-off)
  • male or females (sex is a biologic variable of interest)
  • recent stroke (within one month of symptom onset)- stroke may be ischemic or hemorrhagic based on brain imaging or diagnosed clinically using the locally validated version of the 8-item questionnaire for verifying stroke free status (8-QVSFS) when neuroimaging is not feasible
  • uncontrolled HTN (SBP ≥ 140 mmHg at both the last clinical encounter post-stroke and the eligibility screening visit) - SBP is used as the selection variable since most African hypertensives <60 years have systolic or combination systolic/ diastolic HTN and for most patients, controlling SBP also results in DBP control
  • patients or family carers should own a basic mobile phone that can receive text/audio messages.

Exclusion Criteria:

- Any condition that would limit participation in follow up assessments, such as severe cognitive impairment/dementia (MMSE ≤24).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: PINGS 2

Participants received a 12-month, multicomponent, nurse-led intervention in addition to usual post-stroke care. The intervention included:

Home blood pressure monitoring at least weekly with nurse follow-up for threshold breaches.

Mobile phone medication reminders (daily alarms set on the participant's own device).

Weekly audio health education messages in local dialects emphasizing stroke risk factor control and medication adherence.

Nurse navigators provided case management, coordinated clinic visits as needed, and tracked blood pressure readings and adherence.
Behavioral: PINGS 2
Home BP monitoring, medication reminders using phone alerts, and patient education on hypertension, cardiovascular risk reduction & stroke
Active Comparator: Standard of Care

Participants received standard secondary prevention after stroke according to local guidelines. This typically included periodic physician follow-up, antihypertensive therapy, antiplatelets, and statins prescribed at the clinician's discretion.

To maintain contact frequency similar to the intervention group, participants received neutral lifestyle text messages unrelated to hypertension or stroke prevention.
Other: Standard of Care
Standard of Care (routine post-stroke management per guidelines)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Systolic Blood Pressure
Time Frame: 12 months
Target goal of <140/90 mmHg measured at baseline, months 3, 6, 9 and 12. Measured by blinded evaluator using an automated BP monitor.
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events
Time Frame: 12 months
Major Adverse Cardiovascular events (MACE) to be assessed include recurrent stroke: fatal/ severely disabling stroke or non-fatal stroke; Coronary Artery Disease: Acute STEMI/NSTEMI, sudden cardiac deaths. MACE will be confirmed by a blinded adjudicator by reviewing where available clinical notes supported by investigations e.g. CT scan, EKGs, review of death certificates or verbal autopsy if death occurs outside hospital.
12 months
Self-management
Time Frame: 12 months
Hypertension Self-Care Profile (HBP-SCP) Total Score, a validated measure assessing hypertension self-management across three domains: behavior, motivation, and self-efficacy. Each subscale ranges from 20 to 80, yielding a total score range of 60 to 240. Higher scores indicate better self-care. Month 12 total scores are reported.
12 months
Number of Cardiovascular ED Encounters and Re-hospitalizations
Time Frame: 12 months

To be assessed via once monthly calls to patients and/or carers over 12 months of follow up in both the PINGS and usual care groups.

Patient carers in both arms will also be encouraged to contact study team within 48 hours of hospitalizations for prompt and blinded adjudication of all potential CVD ED encounters to minimize reporting bias between the two groups.
12 months
Health-related Quality of Life: The Euro Quality of Life-5D Questionnaire
Time Frame: 12 months
The EQ-5D questionnaire,186 will assess state of health of study participants at baseline and Month 12. Scores range from 0 (the worst possible health status) to 100 (the best possible health status).
12 months
Medication Adherence: Hill-Bone Compliance Scale
Time Frame: 12 months
Hill-Bone Compliance to High Blood Pressure Therapy Scale, a validated 14-item measure assessing adherence to antihypertensive therapy across three domains: medication-taking behavior, appointment keeping, and salt intake. Total scores range from 14 to 56, with higher scores indicating worse adherence (greater non-adherence). Month 12 total scores are reported.
12 months
Medication Adherence: Medication Possession Ratio (MPR)
Time Frame: 12 months
Medication Possession Ratio (MPR), calculated as the percentage of days covered by filled antihypertensive prescriptions over 12 months. Values range from 0% to 100%, with higher values indicating better adherence. Month 12 MPR values are reported.
12 months

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Health Literacy in HPT/Stroke
Time Frame: 12 months
Self-Report: HTN/stroke Knowledge questionnaire (r=.70) Health literacy questionnaire (r = .74, .82) Assessed at months 0, 6,12. Higher scores indicate higher health literacy. Scales 1-5 are scored on a 4-point Likert-type response scale (strongly disagree, disagree, agree, strongly agree) and scales 6-9 are scored on a 5-point Likert-type scale with response options focusing on difficulty (cannot do or always difficult, usually difficult, sometimes difficult, usually easy, always easy). Month 12 is reported.
12 months
Disability/Functional Status
Time Frame: 12 months
Functional status after stroke will be assessed by Research Assistants using the Modified Rankin Scale with a scores ranging from 0 to 6, where 0=no functional limitation and 6 = death. Assessed at months 0, 3, 6, 9 and 12.
12 months
Sex, Cultural, Socio-economic Factors, Study Site
Time Frame: Baseline
Assessed based on self reports at baseline. Cultural factors to assess include language spoken at home, religious observances, acceptance of gender roles; occupation, religious beliefs and dietary practices.
Baseline
Baseline Age
Time Frame: Baseline
Mean age of participants at enrollment, reported in years. Age is a continuous baseline characteristic and is therefore reported separately from categorical sociodemographic variables. Higher values indicate older age.
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Northern California Institute of Research and Education

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 23, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 5, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 5, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 21, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 26, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 27, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 30, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 14, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 20-30016
  • 5R01HL152188-05 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiovascular Diseases

Clinical Trials on PINGS 2

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings