Clinical Impact of Donor Milk Pasteurized by HTST Treatment in Preterm Infants

September 21, 2023 updated by: Carmen Rosa Pallas

Clinical and Economic Impact of Supplementation With Donor Milk Pasteurized by HTST Method Versus Holder Method in Extremely Birth Weight Preterm Infants. Randomized Clinical Trial

Randomized double-blind clinical trial to compare the incidence of microbiological proven late onset sepsis in extremely preterm infants (<1000 grams) that are supplemented with donor milk pasteurized by High Temperature Short Time (HTST) method versus the Holder method.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Donor milk pasteurized by an innovative High Temperature Short Time (HTST) system (patented by researchers) retains more immune and trophic compounds than pasteurized milk by traditional Holder method. These compounds are related to the protection conferred by breast milk against nosocomial sepsis and necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm infants, so it would be of interest to study if there is a clinical benefit in these patients when health professionals are supplementing with donor milk pasteurized by both methods.

The purpose of this study is to compare the incidence of microbiological proven late onset sepsis in newborns under 1000 grams that in the first 28 days of life need to be supplemented with donor milk pasteurized by HTST method versus the Holder method.

This is a randomized double-blind clinical trial with parallel assignment. A total of 305 premature babies with a birth weight of less than 1000 grams will be recruited, admitted to the Neonatology Services of the Hospital 12 de Octubre and the Hospital de La Paz and meet the inclusion criteria. Half of the patients will be supplemented exclusively with donor milk pasteurized by the HTST system and the other half with pasteurized milk by the Holder method. Linear generalized models will be used for longitudinal data analysis.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
211

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Spain
      • Madrid, Spain, 28046
        • Hospital Universitario La Paz
      • Madrid, Spain, 28041
        • Hospital 12 de Octubre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 4 weeks (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria (all criteria are necessary) :

  • Infants weighing 1000 grams or less at birth
  • Infants born or transferred before the third day of life to the participating centers
  • Start enteral feeding in the first week of life
  • Receive any amount of donor milk in the first 28 days of life
  • Informed consent signed by parents or legal guardians

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Language barrier
  • Infants with chromosomopathies
  • Infants with major congenital malformations
  • Infants with severe asphyxiation (cord pH or first arterial pH <7)
  • Infants included in another clinical trial that modifies nutritional management
  • Infants who previously fed with formula

Post-randomization exclusion criteria:

- Randomized infant who do not fulfill inclusion criteria

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Holder pasteurization
Donor milk pasteurized by Holder method (62.5ºC, 30 minutes)
Other: donor milk
pasteurized donor milk
Experimental: HTST pasteurization
Donor milk pasteurized by High Temperature Short Time (HTST) method (72ºC, 15 seconds)
Other: donor milk
pasteurized donor milk

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Microbiological proven late onset sepsis rate
Time Frame: From the time and day of randomization until the date of discharge from the neonatal unit, assessed up to 24 weeks
Incidence of Microbiological proven late onset sepsis expressed as a percentage
From the time and day of randomization until the date of discharge from the neonatal unit, assessed up to 24 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Central line associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) rate
Time Frame: From the time and day of randomization until the date of discharge from the neonatal unit, assessed up to 24 weeks
Number of CLABSI events per 1000 catheter-days
From the time and day of randomization until the date of discharge from the neonatal unit, assessed up to 24 weeks
Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) and/or microbiological proven late onset sepsis rate
Time Frame: From the time and day of randomization until the date of discharge from the neonatal unit, assessed up to 24 weeks
Incidence of NEC nad late onset sepsis as a percentage
From the time and day of randomization until the date of discharge from the neonatal unit, assessed up to 24 weeks
Mortality rate
Time Frame: From the time and day of randomization until the date of discharge from the neonatal unit, assessed up to 24 weeks
Percentage of preterm infant died during the study
From the time and day of randomization until the date of discharge from the neonatal unit, assessed up to 24 weeks
Oxygen supplementation
Time Frame: Assessed up to 24 weeks
Percentage of infants with respiratory assistance with fraction of inspired oxygen greater than 0.21 at 36 weeks postmenstrual age
Assessed up to 24 weeks
Stage 3-5 Retinopathy
Time Frame: From the time and day of randomization until the date of discharge from the neonatal unit, assessed up to 24 weeks
Percentage of infants diagnosed with retinopathy by the ophthalmologist
From the time and day of randomization until the date of discharge from the neonatal unit, assessed up to 24 weeks
Growth velocity
Time Frame: Assessed up to 24 weeks
Growth calculated as the weight gain in g/kg/day
Assessed up to 24 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Carmen Rosa Pallas

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Chair: Carmen Rosa Pallas Alonso, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 15, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 30, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 15, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 3, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 5, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 11, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 22, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 21, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Neo-HTST

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Late-Onset Neonatal Sepsis

Clinical Trials on donor milk

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings