Cervical Erector Spinae Block Versus Interscalene Block for Shoulder Surgery (cESPINas)

June 20, 2021 updated by: Ilker Ince, Ataturk University

Cervical Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Interscalene Plexus Block for Pain Relief After Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery: A Noninferiority Randomized Clinical Study

Severe pain after arthroscopic surgery is a common experience for the patients . Different regional anesthetic technique has been applicated for postoperative pain relief . The main goal of regional anesthesia regarding postoperative pain relief is to reduce opioid requirements. The most commonly used approach is Interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB), since it provides effective postoperative analgesia upto 12 hours. Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has been reported for a variety of indications such as thoracic and abdominal surgery. Recently, a novel description of a T2-3 erector spinae plane (ESP) as an alternative to a BP block for an upper extremity surgical procedure. Following these studies, direct cervical ESP block has been recently performed successfully as both clinical and cadaveric study. The investigators hypothesized that cervical ESP block is as effective as (non-inferior) interscalene brachial plexus block in terms of postoperative analgesia of shoulder surgery. To evaluate the effectiveness of the cervical ESP block, the investigators have designed a randomized study. Primary aim is to evaluate the postoperative opioid consumption. Secondary aim is to evaluate postoperative pain scores by Numeric Rating Scale (0 to 10 point scale).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This study has been designed as a prospective, randomized and single-blind trial. Local ethics committee of Ataturk University has approved the study (B.30.2.ATA.0.01.00/142). After obtaining the patients' written informed consents, we will include a total number of 94 patients (47 patients for each group). The inclusion criteria of the study was considered as age between 18-80, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status I-III, eligible for regional anesthesia, and unilateral shoulder surgery. The patients who have clotting disorder, contra-indication for regional anesthesia, infection on the injection site, chronic opioid usage, previous same side shoulder surgery, severe Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) , diaphragmatic paralysis, BMI 35 or over will be excluded. A computer-generated randomization program will be used to allocate the patient into two groups. Interscalene brachial plexus block group will be named as Group ISB (n=47) and cervical ESP block group will be named as Group cESP (n=47). The assessor of the outcomes will be blinded to the study groups of the patients. Both ISB block and cervical ESP block will be performed under ultrasound guidance in the block room preoperatively.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
94

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age between 18-80
  2. ASA I-III
  3. Eligible for regional anesthesia
  4. Unilateral shoulder surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. The patients who have clotting disorder
  2. Contra-endication for regional anesthesia
  3. Infection on the injection site
  4. Chronic opioid usage
  5. Previous same side shoulder surgery
  6. Severe COPD
  7. Diaphragmatic paralysis
  8. BMI 35 or over

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Cervical ESP block group
Cervical ESP block will be performed as described by Elsharkawy at al. (7).
Procedure: Cervical ESP block
Cervical ESP block will be performed as described by Elsharkawy at al. (7). ISB block will be performed in transverse orientation of the ultrasound probe to visualize the trunks of the brachial plexus between the anterior and middle scalene muscles
Other Names:
  • ISB Block
Sham Comparator: ISB Block group
ISB block will be performed in transverse orientation of the ultrasound probe to visualize the trunks of the brachial plexus between the anterior and middle scalene muscles
Procedure: Cervical ESP block
Cervical ESP block will be performed as described by Elsharkawy at al. (7). ISB block will be performed in transverse orientation of the ultrasound probe to visualize the trunks of the brachial plexus between the anterior and middle scalene muscles
Other Names:
  • ISB Block

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Opioid consumption
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperatively
Iv Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with fentanyl (10mcg/cc concentration) will be started for all patients
24 hours postoperatively

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative pain scores
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperatively
A Numeric Rating Scale (0 to 10 point scale) wiil be used for pain evaluation.
24 hours postoperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Ataturk University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: İlker İnce, MD, Ataturk University Anesthesiology Clinical Research Office

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 30, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 12, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 16, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 17, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 22, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 20, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • B.30.2.ATA.0.01.00/142

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain, Acute

Clinical Trials on Cervical ESP block

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings