Pharmacokinetic Study for IV Allopregnanolone

May 29, 2026 updated by: Ann M Rasmusson, Boston University

Facilitation of Extinction Retention and Reconsolidation Blockade by IV Allopregnanolone in PTSD- Pharmacokinetic Studies

About 6.4% of the U.S. population suffers from posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Trauma-focused psychotherapies are generally effective in PTSD, but responses vary greatly across individuals and PTSD subpopulations. Neurobiological factors impacted by life experiences, stress, and genetics can affect treatment responses. These factors can alter brain capacities needed to reprocess traumatic memories to prevent them from triggering intense, distressing, disruptive, out-of-place responses.

Before starting the interventional study (described in detail in NCT07079761), the investigators will conduct two pharmacokinetic (PK) studies (PK-1 and PK-2) in a small group of individuals with PTSD to test dosing and safety at Boston Medical Center.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Background: Allo is a neurosteroid (hormone) produced from progesterone by the brain, adrenal glands, testes, and ovaries. Production of Allo and its equally powerful, structurally similar, stereoisomer pregnanolone (PA) is stimulated when certain neurons in the brain are activated and when stress activates the adrenal glands. Allo and PA markedly increase effects of gamma-amino-butyric acid (GABA; an inhibitory neurotransmitter) in the brain, thereby regulating arousal and responses to stress. Allo and PA also influence processes that strengthen or weaken memories.

Basic research suggests that several factors can reduce production of Allo: exposure to chronic or extreme stress, prolonged social isolation, chronic intermittent heavy alcohol use, certain oral contraceptives, chronic use of some psychiatric medications or other substances used to manage PTSD such as nicotine, exposure to environment toxins, and genetic predisposition.

Research shows that Allo and PA production is reduced in a large subpopulation of women and men with PTSD. Reduced Allo and PA is strongly associated with severity and poor retention of extinction learning-both of which contribute to chronic PTSD. The proposed study thus will be conducted in adult men and women with chronic PTSD. Women will be studied during two distinct phases of the menstrual cycle because progesterone levels (and therefore levels of Allo and PA) change markedly across the menstrual cycle, as do problems with extinction retention.

Study Procedures: Eligible participants will take part in a widely used, standardized 3-day laboratory psychophysiology paradigm during which activation of the sympathetic nervous system (fight/flight system) is monitored via small electrode patches placed on the skin. The paradigm involves startle testing on Days 1, 2 and 3. During startle testing, participants will hear sudden bursts of white noise through headphones, see colored shapes on a computer screen, and feel sudden (not painful) blasts of air to the neck. The electrodes record participants' eye blinks, skin conductance, and heart rate. The startling sounds will be about as loud as a train but last only a fraction of a second. Participants will sit quietly with their eyes open as they listen. On study Day 2, participants are randomized by "luck of the draw" or chance to receive either IV Allo or placebo. On study Days 2 and 3, a brief memory test also will be conducted. Blood is collected each day for measurement of Allo, PA and other neurobiological factors that may affect the potential beneficial effects of Allo.

Before starting the above studies, the investigators will conduct pharmacokinetic (PK) studies in a small group of individuals with PTSD to confirm that the selected IV Allo dose increases blood Allo levels as expected.

Implications: These studies may help us understand treatable factors that increase risk for chronic or treatment-resistant PTSD and PTSD-related depression. They may also tell us whether treatments that increase Allo might help prevent or treat PTSD. IV Allo (at much higher doses than used in this study) is currently FDA-approved for treatment of postpartum depression-supporting the potential for this research to spur development of Allo as a new PTSD treatment.

Study Population 256 individuals with PTSD (about 85 males and 170 females) will be recruited to participate in these studies. Half of the women will be studied during the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle (after onset of menses) and half during the luteal phase (after ovulation). The study is being conducted at Boston University School of Medicine in Boston, Massachusetts, and half at Wayne State University School of Medicine in Detroit, Michigan.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

11

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Ann M Rasmusson, MD
  • Phone Number: 617-358-1871
  • Email: ptsdallo@bu.edu

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02118
        • Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 55 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Chronic Posttraumatic Stress Disorder
  • Generally healthy and not on any prohibited medications (that could affect study outcomes)
  • Willing to abstain from alcohol for 2 weeks and from nicotine, marijuana or illicit drugs for 4 weeks before experimental procedures and throughout the study
  • Females: must have a menstrual cycle and not be on hormonal birth control (with a few exceptions; see below)
  • If gender non-conforming: must not be on hormone therapy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Bipolar I disorder, schizophreniform disorder, or clinically significant psychotic symptoms apart from the presence of trauma-related sensory hallucinations or negative beliefs
  • Moderate or severe substance use disorder within three months of screening
  • Sleep Apnea
  • History of a suicide attempt within 1 year of enrolling
  • Imminent risk to self or others or requiring clinical intervention to maintain safety
  • Unstable medical condition or condition that may affect outcomes
  • Moderate or severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) (mild TBI acceptable; moderate TBI allowed for PK study)
  • Using any medications or substances (per self-report or toxicology testing) that may increase the risk for IV Allo side effects or affect the experimental results.
  • Unable to tolerate IV placement or blood drawing by needle stick
  • Wear hearing aids or fail hearing test (not applicable to PK study)
  • Females: pregnant, breastfeeding, or if of childbearing potential, unwilling to use two forms of effective birth control [except for hormonal contraceptives, unless intrauterine device (IUD) or a device like NuvaRing] for one week before and one month after study drug administration

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: PK-1 Group
Participants assigned to this group received IV allopregnanolone as a 5-minute loading dose at 1.7 mcg/kg followed by a maintenance infusion at 2.6 mcg/kg/hr over the next 4-5 hours intended to optimize resting plasma allopregnanolone + pregnanolone levels while outcomes were measured.
For the PK-1 group, after the 5-minute loading dose of IV allopregnanolone, the dose was changed as prescribed to optimize the subject's target plasma allopregnanolone + pregnanolone level for the next 4-5 hours.
Other Names:
  • U.S.P. equivalent: brexanolone (IV Allopregnanolone with Captisol) (SAGE Therapeutics)
Experimental: PK-2 Group
Participants assigned to this group received a 30-minute drug infusion of IV allopregnanolone of 28 mcg/kg, The IV allopregnanolone then was discontinued and only normal saline was continued for the next 4-5 hours while outcomes were measured.
For the PK-2 group, after the 30-minute drug infusion of IV allopregnanolone, the IV allopregnanolone was discontinued and only normal saline was continued for the next 4-5 hours.
Other Names:
  • U.S.P. equivalent: brexanolone (IV allopregnanolone with Captisol) (SAGE Therapeutics)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinician Assessed Sedation Levels for Each Participant
Time Frame: resting pre-infusion; after loading dose at 0 minutes, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 60 minutes, 120 minutes, and 300 minutes
Sedation levels will be assessed with the Qualitative Sedation Rating Scale. It has 5 categories: None- responds normally to verbal commands, cognitive & coordination not impaired, ventilatory & cardiovascular functions unaffected; Minimal- responds normally to verbal commands, unaffected ventilatory & cardiovascular functions, mild feelings of intoxication, cognitive function & coordination may be impaired; Moderate-responds purposefully to commands alone or with light touch, protective airway reflexes & adequate ventilation maintained without intervention, cardiovascular function remains stable; Deep- cannot be easily aroused but responds purposefully to noxious stimulation, assistance may be needed to ensure the airway is protected & adequate ventilation maintained, cardiovascular function is usually stable; Dissociative- trance-like cataleptic state with profound analgesia & amnesia, airway protective reflexes, spontaneous respirations & cardiopulmonary stability retained.
resting pre-infusion; after loading dose at 0 minutes, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 60 minutes, 120 minutes, and 300 minutes
Blood Oxygen Saturation
Time Frame: resting pre-infusion; after loading dose at 0 minutes, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 60 minutes, 120 minutes, and 300 minutes
Average across participants of blood oxygen saturation levels obtained via pulse oximetry (ranging from 0% to 100%) for each time point indicated.
resting pre-infusion; after loading dose at 0 minutes, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 60 minutes, 120 minutes, and 300 minutes
Respiratory Rate
Time Frame: resting pre-infusion; after loading dose at 0 minutes, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 60 minutes, 120 minutes, and 300 minutes
Average across participants of respiratory rate for each time point indicated.
resting pre-infusion; after loading dose at 0 minutes, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 60 minutes, 120 minutes, and 300 minutes
Pulse Rate
Time Frame: resting pre-infusion; after loading dose at 0 minutes, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 60 minutes, 120 minutes, and 300 minutes
Average across participants of pulse rate for each time point indicated.
resting pre-infusion; after loading dose at 0 minutes, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 60 minutes, 120 minutes, and 300 minutes
Diastolic Blood Pressure
Time Frame: resting pre-infusion; after loading dose at 0 minutes, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 60 minutes, 120 minutes, and 300 minutes
Average across participants of diastolic blood pressure for each time point indicated.
resting pre-infusion; after loading dose at 0 minutes, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 60 minutes, 120 minutes, and 300 minutes
Systolic Blood Pressure
Time Frame: resting pre-infusion; after loading dose at 0 minutes, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 60 minutes, 120 minutes, and 300 minutes
Average across participants of systolic blood pressure for each time point indicated.
resting pre-infusion; after loading dose at 0 minutes, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 60 minutes, 120 minutes, and 300 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fear acquisition in Expt. 1
Time Frame: Day 1
Fear acquisition will be defined as the difference between the average SCR to the last 4 CS+ and average SCR to the last 4 CS- trials during the acquisition phase (i.e., differential SCR). For FPS, the last 4 trials of acquisition for each CS will be examined. Since FPS is calculated as the difference between startle to the CSs compared to Noise Alone (NA) trials, the standard is to use FPS to CS+ trials as the dependent variable rather than the difference between FPS to CS+ versus CS- as is typically done for SCR. Higher scores indicate greater conditioned fear acquisition.
Day 1
Fear acquisition in Expt. 2
Time Frame: Day 1
Fear acquisition will be defined as the difference between the average SCR to the last 4 CS+ and average SCR to the last 4 CS- trials during the acquisition phase (i.e., differential SCR). For FPS, the last 4 trials of acquisition for each CS will be examined. Since FPS is calculated as the difference between startle to the CSs compared to NA trials, the standard is to use FPS to CS+ trials as the dependent variable rather than the difference between FPS to CS+ versus CS- as is typically done for SCR. Higher scores indicate greater conditioned fear acquisition.
Day 1
Reinstatement of Conditioned Fear in Expt. 1
Time Frame: Day 3
Reinstatement of conditioned fear will be defined as the average SCR to the last 4 CS+ trials minus the average SCR to the last 4 CS- trials. For FPS, the last 4 CS+ trials will be examined. Higher scores indicate greater reinstatement of conditioned fear.
Day 3
Reinstatement of Conditioned Fear in Expt. 2
Time Frame: Day 3
Reinstatement of conditioned fear will be defined as the average SCR to the last 4 CS+ trials minus the average SCR to the last 4 CS- trials. For FPS, the last 4 CS+ trials will be examined. Higher scores indicate greater reinstatement of conditioned fear.
Day 3

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ann M Rasmusson, MD, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Dept of Psychiatry

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 4, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 29, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

April 29, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 8, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 8, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

July 13, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 2, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 29, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • H-40643
  • R01MH122867 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Post Traumatic Stress Disorder

Clinical Trials on PK-1 Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) allopregnanolone (Allo) with Dexolve in 0.9% saline for infusion manufactured by the University of California, Davis

Search Similar Trials