A Study on the Effect of Position on Walking Labour Epidural Efficacy
Which Position is Best: A Randomized Clinical Trial on the Effect That Position Has on Walking Labour Epidural Analgesia
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Monica San Vicente, MD
- Phone Number: 306-655-1183
- Email: mks773@mail.usask.ca
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Alex Stathakis, MD
- Phone Number: 902-456-0391
- Email: alex.stathakis@usask.ca
Study Locations
-
-
Saskatchewan
-
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada, S7K 1M6
- Recruiting
- Jim Pattison Children's Hospital
-
Contact:
- Monica San Vicente, MD
- Phone Number: 306-655-1183
- Email: mks773@mail.usask.ca
-
Contact:
- Alex Stathakis, MD
- Phone Number: 306-655-1183
- Email: alex.stathakis@usask.ca
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Active labour or admitted for induction of labour
- Requesting an epidural for labour analgesia
- Contractions occurring greater than once every 5 minutes
Exclusion Criteria:
- Coagulation disorder
- High risk pregnancy as per obstetrics
- Spinal pathology (included scoliosis, herniated disks, or previous lumbar back surgery)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Left Uterine Displacement
Supine with left tilt for uterine displacement
|
Parturients will have an epidural placed in the upright seated position as per institution standard.
After epidural placement, they will be positioned as per their randomization.
They will then have a total of 20 cc of epidural solution (0.08% ropivacaine with 2 mcg per cc of fentanyl) injected into the epidural in boluses of 5 cc every 5 minutes.
|
|
Experimental: Left Lateral
Left lateral decubitus position
|
Parturients will have an epidural placed in the upright seated position as per institution standard.
After epidural placement, they will be positioned as per their randomization.
They will then have a total of 20 cc of epidural solution (0.08% ropivacaine with 2 mcg per cc of fentanyl) injected into the epidural in boluses of 5 cc every 5 minutes.
|
|
Experimental: Right Lateral
Right lateral decubitus position
|
Parturients will have an epidural placed in the upright seated position as per institution standard.
After epidural placement, they will be positioned as per their randomization.
They will then have a total of 20 cc of epidural solution (0.08% ropivacaine with 2 mcg per cc of fentanyl) injected into the epidural in boluses of 5 cc every 5 minutes.
|
|
Experimental: Upright
Upright seated position
|
Parturients will have an epidural placed in the upright seated position as per institution standard.
After epidural placement, they will be positioned as per their randomization.
They will then have a total of 20 cc of epidural solution (0.08% ropivacaine with 2 mcg per cc of fentanyl) injected into the epidural in boluses of 5 cc every 5 minutes.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Labour pain based on verbal rating pain scale
Time Frame: Taken at time 0 minutes after epidural insertion
|
Pain with contractions, assessed using a 0 to 10 verbal rating pain scale; 0 being no pain with a contraction and 10 being the worse pain with a contraction.
|
Taken at time 0 minutes after epidural insertion
|
|
Labour pain based on verbal rating pain scale
Time Frame: Taken at time 20 minutes after epidural insertion
|
Pain with contractions, assessed using a 0 to 10 verbal rating pain scale; 0 being no pain with a contraction and 10 being the worse pain with a contraction.
|
Taken at time 20 minutes after epidural insertion
|
|
Labour pain based on verbal rating pain scale
Time Frame: Taken at time 40 minutes after epidural insertion
|
Pain with contractions, assessed using a 0 to 10 verbal rating pain scale; 0 being no pain with a contraction and 10 being the worse pain with a contraction.
|
Taken at time 40 minutes after epidural insertion
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Assessment of epidural levels based on dermatomes
Time Frame: Taken at time 20 minutes after epidural insertion
|
Levels of analgesia assessed via temperature insensitivity to ice on the right and left side along the midclavicular lines of the patient and reported as dermatome levels.
|
Taken at time 20 minutes after epidural insertion
|
|
Assessment of epidural levels based on dermatomes
Time Frame: Taken at time 40 minutes after epidural insertion
|
Levels of analgesia assessed via temperature insensitivity to ice on the right and left side along the midclavicular lines of the patient and reported as dermatome levels.
|
Taken at time 40 minutes after epidural insertion
|
|
Category of epidural based on bilateral dermatome levels
Time Frame: Taken at time 20 minutes after epidural insertion
|
Epidural assessed if it is successful, unilateral (more than two dermatome level difference between sides), patchy (one or more areas between dermatomes that remain sensitive to temperature assessment), or failed (no measurable dermatome levels) based on the dermatome levels gathered by nursing assessments.
|
Taken at time 20 minutes after epidural insertion
|
|
Category of epidural based on bilateral dermatome levels
Time Frame: Taken at time 40 minutes after epidural insertion
|
Epidural assessed if it is successful, unilateral (more than two dermatome level difference between sides), patchy (one or more areas between dermatomes that remain sensitive to temperature assessment), or failed (no measurable dermatome levels) based on the dermatome levels gathered by nursing
|
Taken at time 40 minutes after epidural insertion
|
|
Events of maternal hypotension after epidural placement
Time Frame: Blood pressure taken with a non-invasive blood pressure monitoring cuff every 5 minutes for 20 minutes after epidural insertion
|
Hypotensive events defined as a deviation of greater than 20% of maternal blood pressure compared to pre-epidural baseline.
|
Blood pressure taken with a non-invasive blood pressure monitoring cuff every 5 minutes for 20 minutes after epidural insertion
|
|
Events of fetal bradycardia after epidural placement
Time Frame: Intermittent fetal heart rate monitoring via doppler as per nursing protocol for 20 minutes after epidural insertion
|
Fetal bradycardic events defined as a fetal heart rate of less than 120 bpm after epidural placement.
|
Intermittent fetal heart rate monitoring via doppler as per nursing protocol for 20 minutes after epidural insertion
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Monica San Vicente, MD, University of Saskatchewan
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Halpern SH, Walsh V. Epidural ropivacaine versus bupivacaine for labor: a meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2003 May;96(5):1473-1479. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000052383.01056.8F.
- Epidural and Position Trial Collaborative Group. Upright versus lying down position in second stage of labour in nulliparous women with low dose epidural: BUMPES randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2017 Oct 18;359:j4471. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j4471.
- Husemeyer RP, White DC. Lumbar extradural injection pressures in pregnant women. An investigation of relationships between rate of infection, injection pressures and extent of analgesia. Br J Anaesth. 1980 Jan;52(1):55-60. doi: 10.1093/bja/52.1.55.
- Beilin Y, Bernstein HH, Zucker-Pinchoff B. The optimal distance that a multiorifice epidural catheter should be threaded into the epidural space. Anesth Analg. 1995 Aug;81(2):301-4. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199508000-00016.
- de la Chapelle A, Carles M, Gleize V, Dellamonica J, Lallia A, Bongain A, Raucoules-Aime M. Impact of walking epidural analgesia on obstetric outcome of nulliparous women in spontaneous labour. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2006 Apr;15(2):104-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.07.002. Epub 2006 Jan 24.
- Apostolou GA, Zarmakoupis PK, Mastrokostopoulos GT. Spread of epidural anesthesia and the lateral position. Anesth Analg. 1981 Aug;60(8):584-6.
- Grundy EM, Rao LN, Winnie AP. Epidural anesthesia and the lateral position. Anesth Analg. 1978 Jan-Feb;57(1):95-7. doi: 10.1213/00000539-197801000-00017.
- Beilin Y, Abramovitz SE, Zahn J, Enis S, Hossain S. Improved epidural analgesia in the parturient in the 30 degree tilt position. Can J Anaesth. 2000 Dec;47(12):1176-81. doi: 10.1007/BF03019865.
- Shapiro A, Fredman B, Zohar E, Olsfanger D, Abu-Ras H, Jedeikin R. Alternating patient position following the induction of obstetric epidural analgesia does not affect local anaesthetic spread. Int J Obstet Anesth. 1998 Jul;7(3):153-6. doi: 10.1016/s0959-289x(98)80002-2.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- Bio 1813
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Labor Pain
-
NCT07357246CompletedChildbirth | Normal Labor | Labor Pain and to Reduce Pain
-
NCT07310602CompletedLabor Progress | Labor Pain and Anxiety
-
NCT05628298Not yet recruitingPain | Pain, Labor
-
NCT05226208Completed
-
NCT03566342Terminated
-
NCT07077590Not yet recruitingLabor Pain and to Reduce Pain
-
NCT05034211RecruitingLabor Pain | Pain, Labor | Epidural
Clinical Trials on Lumbar Epidural
-
NCT02412969CompletedLabor Pain | Labor Analgesia
-
NCT03245294CompletedAnalysis, Event History
-
NCT07637643CompletedRestless Legs Syndrome | Lumbar Central Spinal Stenosis
-
NCT07612982Not yet recruitingLumbar Spinal Stenosis
-
NCT03041441Completed
-
NCT07495501Not yet recruitingLumbar Disc Disease | Radiculopathy Lumbar | Radicular Pain
-
NCT01760317CompletedUnilateral Lumbosacral Radiculopathy Pain
-
NCT01315145Completed
-
NCT07199816Active, not recruitingPain Management After Surgery
-
NCT03341182CompletedLumbar Radiculopathy Due to Spinal Nerve Compression