MiDAS III (Mild® Decompression Alternative to Open Surgery): Vertos Mild Patient Evaluation Study (MiDAS III)

August 19, 2015 updated by: Vertos Medical, Inc.
This is a multi-center, prospective, observational clinical study to compare patient outcomes following treatment with either the mild® procedure or epidural steroid injection in patients with moderate to severe lumbar spinal stenosis exhibiting neurogenic claudication.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study was initially designed as a randomized trial. Due to difficulty of enrollment, the study was amended and converted to an observational comparative study with study arm being self-selected by the patient.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

138

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Arizona
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85050
        • Hope Research Institute
      • Scottsdale, Arizona, United States, 85257
        • Center for Pain and Supportive Care
    • California
      • Aptos, California, United States, 95003
        • Pain Clinic of Monterey Bay
      • Chula Vista, California, United States, 91914
        • Pain Control Associates of San Diego
      • Solana Beach, California, United States, 92075
        • Navarro Pain Control Group, Inc.
      • Walnut Creek, California, United States, 94598
        • IPM Medical Group, Inc.
    • District of Columbia
      • Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20037
        • The GW Pain Center
    • Florida
      • Aventura, Florida, United States, 33108
        • Interventional Pain Physicians of South Florida
      • Bradenton, Florida, United States, 34209
        • Coastal Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
      • Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States, 33334
        • Holy Cross Interventional Spine & Pain Medicine Center
      • Merritt Island, Florida, United States, 32953
        • Space Coast Pain Institute
    • Illinois
      • Bloomington, Illinois, United States, 61701
        • Millennium Pain Center
    • Kentucky
      • Frankfort, Kentucky, United States, 40601
        • Commonwealth Pain Specialists, PLLC
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21211
        • The Spine Center Baltimore
    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48105
        • Michigan Pain Specialists
      • Brownstown Twp., Michigan, United States, 48183
        • Michigan Interventional Pain Center
    • Missouri
      • Crystal City, Missouri, United States, 63019
        • Occupational and Pain Management Professionals
    • Nevada
      • Las Vegas, Nevada, United States, 89149
        • Lab2Marche' LLC
    • New Jersey
      • Voorhees, New Jersey, United States, 08043
        • Virtua Pain and Spine Specialists
    • New York
      • Stony Brook, New York, United States, 11794
        • Stony Brook University Medical Center
    • North Carolina
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27103
        • The Center for Clinical Research, LLC
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
        • The Cleveland Clinic Foundation
    • Oregon
      • Eugene, Oregon, United States, 97401
        • NeuroSpine Institute
    • Texas
      • Tyler, Texas, United States, 75701
        • Axis Spine Care
      • Webster, Texas, United States, 77598
        • Space City Pain Specialists, LLP
    • West Virginia
      • Charleston, West Virginia, United States, 25301
        • The Center for Pain Relief, Inc.
      • Huntington, West Virginia, United States, 25702
        • The Center for Pain relief Tri-State

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) with neurogenic claudication where the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of back and leg pain average is ≥ 5.
  • Prior failure of conservative therapy.
  • Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score of ≥ 31%.
  • Radiologic evidence of LSS, with unilateral or bilateral ligamentum flavum ≥ 4.1mm confirmed by pre-op MRI performed within 6-12 months of baseline visit.
  • Able to walk ≥ 10 feet before being limited by pain.
  • Available to complete 24-months of follow-up.
  • Adults ≥ 50 years of age.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior surgery at intended treatment level.
  • History of spinal fractures with current related pain symptoms.
  • Motor deficit or disabling back and/or leg pain from causes other than LSS neurogenic claudication (e.g. acute compression fracture, metabolic neuropathy, vascular claudication symptoms, etc.).
  • Significant/symptomatic disc protrusion or osteophyte formation judged by the Investigator as possible confounding factor to study results.
  • Excessive facet hypertrophy judged by the Investigator as possible confounding factor to study results.
  • Significant symptomatic foraminal stenosis.
  • Confirmed anterior or retro-listhesis ≥ 3mm.
  • Bleeding disorders and/or current use of anti-coagulants with the inability to withhold anticoagulants for required time prior to procedure.
  • Able to walk ≥ 200 yards unaided in erect non-flexed position before being limited by pain.
  • Able to stand ≥ 15 minutes in erect, non-flexed position before being limited by pain.
  • Use of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and/or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) within 7 days of treatment.
  • Pregnant and/or breastfeeding.
  • Body mass index (BMI) ≥ 32 as calculated using the patient's weight multiplied by 703 then divided by height in inches squared.
  • Epidural steroid, systemic steroid or any spine interventional procedure within prior six weeks of study procedure.
  • Dementia and/or inability to give informed consent and to understand and complete follow-up patient reported outcomes forms.
  • Inability of the patient to lie prone for any reason with anesthesia support (e.g. chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), obesity, etc.).
  • On (or pending) Workman's Compensation or known to be considering litigation associated with back pain.
  • Unable to tolerate MRI (pacemaker, spinal cord stimulator, etc.).
  • Intrathecal pump.
  • Any medical condition determined by the Investigator that would not allow subject to fulfill trial requirements or safely tolerate procedures in this study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Percutaneous Lumbar Decompression
Patients receiving percutaneous decompression using the mild® Device Kit.
The percutaneous procedure is performed under fluoroscopic guidance to effect a lumbar decompression with minimal surrounding tissue and bone disruption. The mild® Device Kit is utilized to access, capture and remove bone and tissue.
Other Names:
  • mild procedure
  • mild lumbar decompression
Active Comparator: Lumbar Epidural Steroid Injection
Injection of epidural steroids into the lumbar spine
Injection of epidural steroids into the lumbar spine
Other Names:
  • ESI

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With a 2-point Improvement in Visual Analogue Scale
Time Frame: 16 weeks
The primary endpoint for evaluating effectiveness will be the proportion of subjects in each group achieving at least a 2-point improvement from baseline in the Visual Analog Scale.
16 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nagy Mekhail, MD, The Cleveland Clinic

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 11, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 11, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

March 15, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 31, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 19, 2015

Last Verified

August 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MiDAS III

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Clinical Trials on Epidural Steroid Injection

Subscribe