Influence of Patient Decision-Making Aids for Patients With Unilateral Ureteral Stone: A Randomized-Controlled Trial

August 5, 2020 updated by: Taipei Medical University Shuang Ho Hospital

Ureteral stone is a common disease with high prevalence and recurrence rate in Taiwan. Taiwan is located in subtropical zone, where urolithiasis is commonly seen. A national survey in Taiwan determined that 9.6% of the population suffered stones throughout their lifetime. Symptoms of ureteral stone include renal colic, hematuria, and urinary tract infection. Without proper treatment, ureteral stone could lead to renal function impairment such as acute kidney injury (AKI) or chronic kidney disease (CKD). There are several treatment options for ureteral stone, such as ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URSL), flexible urteroscopic lithotripsy (F-URSL), percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), and Medical expulsive therapy (MET).

However, there are only few minutes from diagnosis of ureteral stone to possible treatment options explanation. It's difficult for patients to well understand all the details of possible treatments under such circumstances.

Therefore, we design a patient decision aid (PDA) for unilateral ureteral stone to help patients understand all the treatment options. The PDA is standardized, written in plain language and patient-centered, with pictures attached.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Background:

Shared decision making (SDM) has been defined as: 'an approach where clinicians and patients share the best available evidence when faced with the task of making decisions, and where patients are supported to consider options, to achieve informed preferences". To conduct SDM, a PDA was developed to be administered for patients with ureteral stone to choose treatment options. We expect the PDA would benefit the intervention group in the aspects of knowledge and communication in choosing treatment.The aim of this study is to conduct a single center randomized controlled trial (RCT ) to evaluate the benefit of PDAs on decision making.

Patients and Methods:

Decision aids are interventions designed to help patients with ureteral stone to choose their treatment options for unilateral ureteral stone and any potential outcome relevant to treatment options. Patients with unilateral ureteral stone are randomly assigned to receive a PDA (PDA group) or the standard oral information (control group) during consultation.

In control group, patients will receive standard oral information. In PDA group group, PDA will be used as a tool to explain the benefits and harms between ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URSL), flexible urteroscopic lithotripsy (F-URSL), extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL). And by following SDM principles, the patients are guided to consider their individual values and preferences and helped to make a choice that best meet their needs. This study will be conducted in a single center (Shuang Ho Hospital). The outcomes are decision conflicts and decision-making and SURE test before treatment.

Hypothesis:

We expect that the PDA would promote communications between doctors and patients, to further help the patient to make a proper decision for his/her own.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
100

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Ages between 18 and 75
  • Ureteral stone diagnosed with KUB, IVP or CT
  • Stone size between 0 to 2 cm

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Stone passage spontaneously
  • Patients who do not speak Mandarian
  • Patients with dementia
  • Nationality not Republic of China
  • Patients with bilateral ureteral stone
  • Patients with staghorn stone
  • Patients with bladder stone
  • Patients with severe infection
  • Pregnant women
  • Others patients could not communicate with

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Decision aid group
Shared decision making using decision aid
Other: Decision aid
Patient Decision Aid is a tool that helps patient with ureteral stone become involved in decision making on choosing treatment for ureteral stone. Patient Decision Aid provides information about the options and outcomes, and by clarifying personal values.
No Intervention: Controlled group
Standard oral explanation the details of treament options

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Decision conflicts
Time Frame: For patients choose URSL or F-URSL, one day before the operation. For patients choose ESWL, half an hour before the treatment.
Total score of decisional conflict scale
For patients choose URSL or F-URSL, one day before the operation. For patients choose ESWL, half an hour before the treatment.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
SURE test
Time Frame: For patients choose URSL or F-URSL, one day before the operation. For patients choose ESWL, half an hour before the treatment.
Total score of SURE test
For patients choose URSL or F-URSL, one day before the operation. For patients choose ESWL, half an hour before the treatment.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Taipei Medical University Shuang Ho Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Yi-Te Chiang, MD, No.291, Zhongzheng Rd., Zhonghe , Taipei 23561, Taiwan. Shuanghe Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 5, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 5, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 7, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 7, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 5, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • N202003100

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings