Performance Assessment of SARS-CoV-2 Detection Breath Biopsy - SARS-CoV-2 Study (COVID)

March 29, 2021 updated by: Owlstone Ltd

Performance Assessment of SARS-CoV-2 Detection Through Analysis of Exhaled Breath Aerosols

The primary aim of this study is to investigate the performance of Breath Biopsy RD for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in both a clinical and at home setting.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This study aims to evaluate Owlstone Medical's Breath Biopsy RD Collectors for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection. These single use disposable breath capture devices can be used independently by individuals and shipped to be analysed in a central lab for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 using established existing PCR assays available in any reference lab. The aerosol collectors furthermore directly sample exhaled breath aerosols. As such they directly sample the primary transmission route for the virus. This could result in a higher rate of retrieval of viral RNA in infected individuals thereby increasing the sensitivity of the applied PCR assay. This is underpinned by the fact that CT abnormalities in the lower airways appear to occur prior to upper respiratory tract samples becoming positive in cases suffering from nCOVID19, suggesting lower airway viral loads could be higher. Combined, this could enable more widespread access to diagnostics, reduce the need for repeat testing, decrease the need for healthcare professionals to perform diagnostic tests and reduce cross-contamination risk.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
40

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The inclusion and exclusion criteria for the various study populations are detailed above. General inclusion and exclusion criteria which apply to all study subjects are detailed followed by indication specific criteria are also detailed for both inclusion and exclusion.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Any adult >18 years with either a confirmed (phase 1) or suspected (phase 2&3) SARS-CoV-2 infection will be eligible to participate in this study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject who are deemed unlikely to be able to maintain oxygen saturation of greater than 90% while breathing room air for 30 seconds
  • Subject who require non-invasive ventilation or high flow nasal oxygen
  • Subject who require inotropic medication to maintain adequate organ perfusion
  • Subject who have a communication barrier and / or unable to comply with the instructions to use the Breath Biopsy test

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Positive control for technical validation
Time Frame: 1 year
The purpose of this stage is to confirm the optimal extraction protocol to detect the presence of SARS-CoV-2 from the aerosols captured in the Breath Biopsy RD device. Up to two Breath Biopsy RD sample will be collected alongside a nasopharyngeal. The swab obtained during this stage is to be analysed in parallel to the extracted breath aerosols in the lab of the lab and will be used as a positive control.
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluation of test performance
Time Frame: 1 year
The aim is to assess the test performance of the Breath Biopsy RD devices in a real live clinical setting. Subjects with a high clinical suspicion of nCOVID-19 based on clinical triage will be requested to participate. A single Breath Biopsy RD collector will be collected in parallel with the standard diagnostic work-up consisting of a CT-scan and a nasopharyngeal swab.
1 year

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluation of at home test
Time Frame: 1 year
The aim of the final outcome is to evaluate the performance and acceptability of using the Breath Biopsy RD as an at home test for identification of the presence of SARS-CoV-2. The OLVG phone application used for triage of the presence of nCOVID-19 will be used to identify subjects at the highest risk of having nCOVID-19. These subjects will be sent a Breath Biopsy RD collector and oropharyngeal swab for at home testing. Any subject who has a positive Breath Biopsy test for SARS-CoV-2 will be contacted and advised to receive a nasopharyngeal test for assessment of viral presence. Both tests will be self-administered to mimic an at home use scenario. The performance of both tests will be confirmed from the perspective of 1. Adherence 2. Subject comfort 3. Number of SARS-CoV-2 positive cases.
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Owlstone Ltd

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Maastricht University
OLVG

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Chair: Paul Savelkoul,, OLVG
  • Study Chair: Paul Bresser, Maastricht

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 30, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 19, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 19, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 7, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 7, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 11, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 1, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 29, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • SARS-CoV-2 study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings