Patient Priority Care for Older Adults With Multiple Chronic Conditions (PPC-CCF)
Patient Priority Care for Older Adults With Multiple Chronic Conditions Achieved Through Primary and Specialty Care Alignment
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Healthcare for older adults with multiple chronic conditions (MCCs) is burdensome and of uncertain benefit, resulting in unwanted and unhelpful care. Patient Priorities Care (PPC) is an approach that aligns care with patients' health priorities (i.e. the health outcomes most desired given the healthcare each is willing and able to receive). PPC offers the opportunity to increase value by improving both outputs (desired health outcomes) and inputs (healthcare preferences) for these major users of healthcare.
We will employ a quasi-experimental, usual care (UC) group design, involving 2 primary care sites (1 PPC and 1 UC. Patients are assigned to intervention or usual care arms based on their primary care practice location. We will use analytic techniques (e.g., inverse propensity score weighting) designed to reduce selection bias and balance PPC and UC sites in terms of baseline characteristics. Data collection will occur through quantitative and qualitative interviews and health encounter information in the Electric Health Record(EHR).
Patient Priorities Care requires the elicitation and documentation of patient health outcome goals and care preferences and the alignment of clinical care with goals and priorities to achieve patients' health outcome goals and reduce the burden of multi-morbidity. Participants will be enrolled in the Patient Priorities Care Program and speak with a trained health priorities facilitator to elicit their healthcare preferences and health outcome goals, which together constitute their health priorities. This information will be documented, entered into the EHR, and shared with the clinicians who will then use the Patient Priorities Care approach with patients to inform and guide treatment decisions. Patients will participate in the program and be followed for up to one year from the health priorities identification visit.
To determine the value of PPC, comparable primary care sites within the Cleveland Clinic will be assigned to PPC or Usual care (UC). Clinicians and staff at the PPC site will be trained to identify and align decision-making with the health priorities of older adults with MCCs. Value will be compared using patient and provider-reported outcomes, healthcare utilization, and possibly costs at PPC and UC sites.
The ultimate goal of our work is to implement and evaluate this approach to care for older adults with multiple chronic conditions that focuses on what matters most to them and is less fragmented and burdensome, resulting in better quality and outcomes at lower cost. This study will focus on evaluating practice change at test sites at the Cleveland Clinic.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Ohio
-
Lakewood, Ohio, United States, 44107
- Cleveland Clinic Lakewood Family Health Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 66 and older
- In the Cleveland Clinic patient population
- In the clinician practices selected as intervention or usual care practice sites
- Clinically identified by: Those who meet any of several criteria i. 3 chronic conditions (See appendix 0 for the complete list) ii. 10 medications iii. >2 ED visits over the past year iv. >1 hospitalization (or >10 days in hospital) v. receive any care coordination services vi. 2 specialists over past year
Exclusion Criteria:
- In hospice or meeting hospice criteria for any condition
- Advanced dementia or moderate to profound intellectual disabilities
- Not English speaking
- Nursing home resident
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Intervention (Implementing Patient Priorities Care)
Patient Priorities Care requires the elicitation and documentation of patient health outcome goals and care preferences and the alignment of clinical care with health goals and healthcare preferences (collectively referred to as health priorities).
Participants will be contacted by a trained priorities facilitator in-person or over the phone to elicit their health priorities.
This information will be documented in the PPC- GOALS AND PREFERENCES form in the EHR and shared with the clinicians who will then use the Patient Priorities Care approach with patients to inform and guide treatment decisions.
|
Patient Priorities Care (PPC) is an innovative approach to shared decision-making that draws from existing professional training. PPC requires the elicitation and documentation of patient health outcome goals and care preferences and the alignment of clinical care with health goals and healthcare preferences. This information will be collected and documented in the EHR by facilitators and shared with the clinicians who will then use the PPC approach with patients to inform and guide treatment decisions. The PCPs will be trained in decisional strategies that have been shown to help align care with patients' health priorities. While encouraged to use these decisional strategies, PCPs will be free to make the recommendations they feel most appropriate for each patient. This intervention has been developed to be integrated seamlessly into usual care.
Other Names:
|
|
No Intervention: Usual Care (Not implementing PPC)
Patients will receive routine clinical care.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Treatment Burden
Time Frame: from baseline to follow-up at 8-9 months
|
Change in patient score on 'Treatment Burden Questionnaire' (TBQ, score range 0-150, Cronbach's alpha=0.90)
Lower score reflects less perceived treatment burden.
|
from baseline to follow-up at 8-9 months
|
|
Achievement of Desired Activities
Time Frame: at follow-up (8-9 months) The scale instructions do not reference timeframe.
|
Patient score on PROMIS Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities Shot Form 6a (score range 6-30; Cronbach's alpha = 0.98) Higher score reflects more social participation.
|
at follow-up (8-9 months) The scale instructions do not reference timeframe.
|
|
Health Care Utilization Defined by Healthcare Contact Days
Time Frame: from 3 months prior to 12 months following baseline interview
|
Number of health care contact days defined as number of ED visits, days in hospital +.5*number of outpatient encounters for procedures, tests, healthcare visits.
|
from 3 months prior to 12 months following baseline interview
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Shared Decision Making and Goal Ascertainment
Time Frame: at 8-9 months follow-up
|
Change in patient score on CollaboRATE tool (score 0-100, Cronbach's alpha=0.89)
from baseline to follow-up up at 8-9 months and response to Cleveland Clinic ACO survey item "When starting a new medication, did your provider ask what you thought was best for you?" Scores are dichotomized 100 vs. <100 with 100 being the percent of participants who reported the top score of all three items.
|
at 8-9 months follow-up
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Ardeshir Hashmi, MD, The Cleveland Clinic
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Austin PC, Stuart EA. Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies. Stat Med. 2015 Dec 10;34(28):3661-79. doi: 10.1002/sim.6607. Epub 2015 Aug 3.
- Austin PC. An Introduction to Propensity Score Methods for Reducing the Effects of Confounding in Observational Studies. Multivariate Behav Res. 2011 May;46(3):399-424. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2011.568786. Epub 2011 Jun 8.
- Blaum CS, Rosen J, Naik AD, Smith CD, Dindo L, Vo L, Hernandez-Bigos K, Esterson J, Geda M, Ferris R, Costello D, Acampora D, Meehan T, Tinetti ME. Feasibility of Implementing Patient Priorities Care for Older Adults with Multiple Chronic Conditions. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Oct;66(10):2009-2016. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15465. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
- Boyd C, Smith CD, Masoudi FA, Blaum CS, Dodson JA, Green AR, Kelley A, Matlock D, Ouellet J, Rich MW, Schoenborn NL, Tinetti ME. Decision Making for Older Adults With Multiple Chronic Conditions: Executive Summary for the American Geriatrics Society Guiding Principles on the Care of Older Adults With Multimorbidity. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Apr;67(4):665-673. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15809. Epub 2019 Mar 10.
- Z. Zhao, "Using matching to estimate treatment effects: Data requirements, matching metrics, and Monte Carlo evidence," in Review of Economics and Statistics, 2004, doi: 10.1162/003465304323023705.
- D. B. Rubin, "Using Multivariate Matched Sampling and Regression Adjustment to Control Bias in Observational Studies," J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 1979, doi: 10.1080/01621459.1979.10482513.
- Tran VT, Harrington M, Montori VM, Barnes C, Wicks P, Ravaud P. Adaptation and validation of the Treatment Burden Questionnaire (TBQ) in English using an internet platform. BMC Med. 2014 Jul 2;12:109. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-12-109.
- Hahn EA, Kallen MA, Jensen RE, Potosky AL, Moinpour CM, Ramirez M, Cella D, Teresi JA. Measuring social function in diverse cancer populations: Evaluation of measurement equivalence of the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System(R) (PROMIS(R)) Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities short form. Psychol Test Assess Model. 2016 Jun 27;58(2):403-421.
- Groff AC, Colla CH, Lee TH. Days Spent at Home - A Patient-Centered Goal and Outcome. N Engl J Med. 2016 Oct 27;375(17):1610-1612. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1607206. No abstract available.
- Russell LB, Ibuka Y, Carr D. How Much Time Do Patients Spend on Outpatient Visits?: The American Time Use Survey. Patient. 2008 Jul 1;1(3):211-22. doi: 10.2165/1312067-200801030-00008.
- Forcino RC, Barr PJ, O'Malley AJ, Arend R, Castaldo MG, Ozanne EM, Percac-Lima S, Stults CD, Tai-Seale M, Thompson R, Elwyn G. Using CollaboRATE, a brief patient-reported measure of shared decision making: Results from three clinical settings in the United States. Health Expect. 2018 Feb;21(1):82-89. doi: 10.1111/hex.12588. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
- D. B. Rubin, "Using propensity scores to help design observational studies: Application to the tobacco litigation," Matched Sampl. Causal Eff., pp. 365-382, 2006, doi:
- Stuart EA. Matching methods for causal inference: A review and a look forward. Stat Sci. 2010 Feb 1;25(1):1-21. doi: 10.1214/09-STS313.
- D. Rubin, Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. Wiley, 1987.
- J. Cohen, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1988.
- Tinetti M, Dindo L, Smith CD, Blaum C, Costello D, Ouellet G, Rosen J, Hernandez-Bigos K, Geda M, Naik A. Challenges and strategies in patients' health priorities-aligned decision-making for older adults with multiple chronic conditions. PLoS One. 2019 Jun 10;14(6):e0218249. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218249. eCollection 2019.
- Tinetti ME, Naik AD, Dindo L, Costello DM, Esterson J, Geda M, Rosen J, Hernandez-Bigos K, Smith CD, Ouellet GM, Kang G, Lee Y, Blaum C. Association of Patient Priorities-Aligned Decision-Making With Patient Outcomes and Ambulatory Health Care Burden Among Older Adults With Multiple Chronic Conditions: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Dec 1;179(12):1688-1697. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.4235.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 20-555
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Multiple Chronic Conditions
-
NCT05000489CompletedChronic Conditions, Multiple
-
NCT05972031RecruitingChronic Conditions, Multiple | Chronic Condition
-
NCT05495230CompletedChronic Conditions, Multiple | Chronic Condition
-
NCT04448210CompletedHealthy | Chronic Illnesses, Multiple
-
NCT06388499CompletedChronic Conditions, Multiple
-
NCT06058754RecruitingChronic Disease | Chronic Conditions, Multiple | Chronic Condition
-
NCT05775653CompletedChronic Conditions, Multiple | Chronic Condition
-
NCT04779931CompletedChronic Conditions, Multiple
-
NCT07299786Completed
Clinical Trials on Patient Priorities Care
-
NCT06001775CompletedPatient Priorities Care Among Persons Living With Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia (IN-TX-PPC)Dementia | Mild Cognitive Impairment
-
NCT07483528Not yet recruitingTraumatic Brain Injury | TBI | Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) Patients
-
NCT05303194CompletedDementia | Multiple Chronic Conditions
-
NCT06478589RecruitingBreast Cancer Survivorship
-
NCT04922320CompletedMultiple Chronic Conditions | Decision Making, Shared
-
NCT05129709CompletedMultiple Chronic Conditions | Family Members
-
NCT06257888CompletedA Prospective Cohort With Patient Navigation as an Intervention for Breast Cancer Patients (NAVIMOZ)Breast Neoplasm Malignant Primary
-
NCT02024360CompletedObesity | Overweight | Children