Patient Priorities for Survivorship Care in Older Breast Cancer Survivors

August 6, 2025 updated by: Dana Giza, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
The objective of this study is to adapt the Patient Priorities Care (PPC) framework to breast cancer survivorship via a user-centered approach, through an iterative process in which patients and their physicians help to refine and modify the intervention. A second objective is to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of the adapted PPC framework in breast cancer survivorship for older adults.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In the proposed project, we will use a Patient Priorities Care framework to explore older breast cancer survivors' priorities and health care preferences for high-quality breast cancer survivorship. The framework will include two components: (1) a health priorities identification session with a facilitator, and (2) an encounter with the oncology provider to discuss changes in the patient's care plan to align it with his/her priorities. Our overall hypothesis is that prioritizing patients' priorities is feasible and facilitates individualized survivorship care for older women with breast cancer and multiple chronic conditions. An advisory panel composed of oncologists, geriatricians, and patient advocates will provide regular feedback throughout the refinement and adaptation of the Patient Priorities Care framework to the breast cancer survivorship context and engage in an iterative process of development. After incorporating feedback from the stakeholder panel to create an adapted version of the framework, we will carry out a randomized quality improvement project with the objective of evaluating the feasibility of using the framework in the context of breast cancer survivorship and provide empirical estimates of treatment effect sizes by measuring treatment burden and quality of life at 3 months, adherence to basic and priorities driven survivorship care recommendations at 12 months. Ultimately, the results of this project will provide initial direction for intended improvement, which will be verified in a larger, future trial.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

120

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Bellaire, Texas, United States, 77401
        • Recruiting
        • UT Physicians Center for Healthy Aging Bellaire
        • Contact:
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Recruiting
        • Memorial Hermann Cancer Center
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Dana E Giza, MD
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77006
        • Recruiting
        • UT Physicians Family Medicine Bayshore
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Dana E Giza, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • able to write and speak English
  • Stage DCIS/I/II/III breast cancer diagnosis
  • 3 months from active cancer therapy (including first or second-line treatment chemotherapy, radiation and/or surgery, or multimodal treatment) up to 10 years since completing treatment
  • ≥3 documented comorbidities by chart review, or taking ≥10 medications, have ≥ 1 hospitalization over the past year, ≥ 2 emergency department visits over the past year, seen by > 2 specialists over the past year
  • able to provide consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • currently on active cancer therapy (including first or second-line treatment chemotherapy, radiation and/or surgery, or multimodal treatment)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Adapted Patient Priorities Care (PPC) approach plus Usual Care
Older adults breast cancer survivors will have a visit with a facilitator to discuss about their health priorities for breast cancer survivorship care prior to their usual visit with the oncology/primary care physicians to discuss about aspects of survivorship care
Step 1 is a PPC facilitation encounter, at which the facilitator will help the participant identify patient priorities, such as clarifying values (what matters most); setting meaningful, specific, and realistic outcome goals; describing healthcare preferences (care that is helpful and/or burdensome) and tradeoffs; and discussing priorities with clinicians. The participant's healthcare priorities are then documented and transmitted to clinicians, in order to facilitate changes in the patient's care plan to align it with his/her priorities. In step 2, the clinician considers patient's priorities and potential healthcare options (options might include starting or stopping treatments; adding or removing medications; ordering more or fewer tests; recommending or removing self-management tasks). In step 3, the clinician discusses care options with the participant, using strategies for aligning care with patient priorities.
Usual care for breast cancer survivorship includes regular visits with the oncology provider and yearly mammograms for surveillance.
Active Comparator: Usual Care
Older adults breast cancer survivors will have usual healthcare visits with the oncology/primary care physicians to discuss aspects of survivorship care
Usual care for breast cancer survivorship includes regular visits with the oncology provider and yearly mammograms for surveillance.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Treatment burden as assessed by the treatment burden questionnaire (TBQ)
Time Frame: baseline
The treatment burden questionnaire (TBQ) measures perceptions of burden of overall care (for example, medication taking, self monitoring, visits to the provider, tests, tasks to access and coordinate care). Total score ranges from 0 to 150, and a higher score indicates greater perceived burden.
baseline
Treatment burden as assessed by the treatment burden questionnaire (TBQ)
Time Frame: 3 months
The treatment burden questionnaire (TBQ) measures perceptions of burden of overall care (for example, medication taking, self monitoring, visits to the provider, tests, tasks to access and coordinate care). Total score ranges from 0 to 150, and a higher score indicates greater perceived burden.
3 months
Treatment burden as assessed by the treatment burden questionnaire (TBQ)
Time Frame: 6 months
The treatment burden questionnaire (TBQ) measures perceptions of burden of overall care (for example, medication taking, self monitoring, visits to the provider, tests, tasks to access and coordinate care). Total score ranges from 0 to 150, and a higher score indicates greater perceived burden.
6 months
Health status as assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast (FACT-B)
Time Frame: baseline
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy- Breast (FACT-B) is a standardized approach to objectively evaluate and quantify the overall health status of patients with subscales measuring physical, social, emotional, and functional well-being. Total score ranges from 0 to 148, where a higher score indicates a better outcome.
baseline
Health status as assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast (FACT-B)
Time Frame: 3 months
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy- Breast (FACT-B) is a standardized approach to objectively evaluate and quantify the overall health status of patients with subscales measuring physical, social, emotional, and functional well-being. Total score ranges from 0 to 148, where a higher score indicates a better outcome.
3 months
Health status as assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast (FACT-B)
Time Frame: 6 months
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy- Breast (FACT-B) is a standardized approach to objectively evaluate and quantify the overall health status of patients with subscales measuring physical, social, emotional, and functional well-being. Total score ranges from 0 to 148, where a higher score indicates a better outcome.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of participants who adhere to survivorship basic recommendations
Time Frame: from baseline to 12 months
Survivorship basic recommendations for breast cancer survivors, as recommended by the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) guidelines, include receiving a detailed cancer-related history and physical examination every 3-6 months for the first 3 years and every 6 to 12 months for the next 2 years, as well as having an annual mammogram (unilateral if for unilateral mastectomies or bilateral for patients with lumpectomies or other breast conserving strategies).
from baseline to 12 months
Number of participants who adhere to priorities-driven survivorship recommendations
Time Frame: from baseline to 12 months
Adherence to priorities-driven survivorship recommendations will focus on adherence to medications, self-management tasks, procedures, tests or referrals recommended during survivorship care based on patient's priorities.
from baseline to 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Dana E. Giza, MD, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 2, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 22, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 22, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

June 27, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 12, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 6, 2025

Last Verified

August 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HSC-MS-23-0591
  • K12TR004908-02 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract: NCATS)
  • 1R03AG089057-01 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer Survivorship

Clinical Trials on Adapted Patient Priorities Care (PPC) approach

Subscribe