- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04448210
Web-based Resource for Children and Adolescents About Clinical Research
November 23, 2020 updated by: Alison Parker, Innovation Research & Training
The overall aims of this project are to: 1) create a developmentally appropriate interactive educational website for adolescents called DigiKnowIt News: Teen, and 2) examine the feasibility of DigiKnowIt News: Teen in a small randomized control trial with adolescents.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Youth (N=30) will be recruited to participate in the feasibility study.
Parent permission and youth assent will be sought.
Participants will be randomized into one of two study arms: intervention and wait-list control.
All participants will complete a web-based pre-test questionnaire.
Youth in the intervention group will then receive access to DigiKnowIt News: Teen for one week.
Approximately one week after completing the pre-test questionnaire, all participants will complete a web-based post-test questionnaire (the post-test for youth in the intervention group will also include Consumer Satisfaction Questions).
Youth in the wait-list control group will then receive access to DigiKnowIt News: Teen for one week.
After one week, they will complete a Consumer Satisfaction Questionnaire.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
42
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
North Carolina
-
Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27713
- innovation Research & Training
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
12 years to 17 years (Child)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Participants must be between the ages of 12 and 17 years.
- Participants must have access to a computer or tablet with Internet connection.
- Participants must be able to read and write in English fluently.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Participants must NOT have previously participated in a clinical trial.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Educational website intervention
The intervention is an educational website designed to teach youth (12-17 years) about pediatric clinical trials.
|
Teens will interact with a multimedia educational website that will teach them about pediatric clinical trials including topics such as participant rights and safety, benefits and costs to participating in a study, and different types of procedures used in trials.
|
|
No Intervention: Wait-list control
The wait-list control group did not receive the intervention between the pre-test and post-test assessments.
After completing the post-test questionnaire, youth in the wait-list control group had the option to receive access to the intervention (DigiKnowIt News).
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Knowledge Scores at 1 Week
Time Frame: 1 week
|
Youth will respond to 25 questions that assess their factual knowledge about clinical research (e.g., Who is part of a clinical trial?).
Questions are in multiple choice format and some questions have multiple correct answers.
The correct responses were summed across the questions.
The range of scores is from 0 to 46.
Higher scores indicate more knowledge about clinical research.
|
1 week
|
|
Attitudes Scores at 1 Week
Time Frame: 1 week
|
Youth will be asked to respond to 6 questions that assess their positive attitudes about clinical trials (e.g., How do you feel about kids participating in clinical trials?; 1=Not good at all; 2=Not very good; 3=Not sure; 4=Good; 5=Very good).
Responses to this scale were averaged and the minimum scale score was 1 and the maximum scale score was 5. Higher scores indicate more positive attitudes toward clinical trials.
|
1 week
|
|
Beliefs Scores at 1 Week
Time Frame: 1 week
|
Youth will be asked to respond to 5 questions that assess their beliefs about positive aspects of pediatric clinical research (e.g., I believe that clinical trials can help kids; 1=Strongly Disagree; 2=Disagree; 3=Unsure; 4=Agree; 5=Strongly Agree).
Responses to this scale were averaged and the minimum scale score was 1 and the maximum scale score was 5. Higher scores indicate more positive beliefs about clinical research.
|
1 week
|
|
Self-Efficacy to Communicate Scores at 1 Week
Time Frame: 1 week
|
Youth will be asked to respond to 10 questions related to their self-efficacy for making decisions related to participation in clinical trials for communicating about clinical trials (e.g., Tell the researcher that I don't want to participate in the clinical trial, even if they really want me to do it; 1 = I cannot do it at all; 5 = I know I can do it.).
Responses to this scale were averaged and the minimum scale score was 1 and the maximum scale score was 5. Higher scores indicate more self-efficacy about communicating about clinical trials.
|
1 week
|
|
Self-Efficacy to Gather Information Scores at 1 Week
Time Frame: 1 week
|
Youth will be asked to respond to 9 questions related to their self-efficacy for making decisions related to participation in clinical trials for gathering information about clinical trials (e.g., How sure are you that you can do the following things: Ask my parents questions for more information about clinical trials?; 1 = I cannot do it at all; 5 = I know I can do it.).
Responses to this scale were averaged and the minimum scale score was 1 and the maximum scale score was 5. Higher scores indicate more self-efficacy for gathering information about clinical trials.
|
1 week
|
|
Confidence Scores at 1 Week
Time Frame: 1 week
|
Youth will be asked to respond to 3 questions to measure youths' confidence for participating clinical trials (e.g., I know what rights I have in a clinical trial.
I know whom to ask if I need more information about a clinical trial.; 1=Strongly Disagree; 2=Disagree; 3=Unsure; 4=Agree; 5=Strongly Agree).
Responses to this scale were averaged and the minimum scale score was 1 and the maximum scale score was 5. Higher scores indicate more confidence for participating in clinical trials.
|
1 week
|
|
Procedural Fears Scores at 1 Week
Time Frame: 1 week
|
Youth will be asked to respond to 4 questions related to their perceptions of fear or anxiety about different types of medical procedures, including getting a needle in the arm, injection in the leg, getting a scan, and taking new medicine, on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = Not at all afraid or anxious, 2 = Somewhat afraid or anxious, 3 = Moderately afraid or anxious, 4 = Very afraid or anxious, 5 = Extremely afraid or anxious).
Responses to this scale were averaged and the minimum scale score was 1 and the maximum scale score was 5. Higher scores indicate more fears about medical procedures.
|
1 week
|
|
Likelihood of Participation Scores at 1 Week
Time Frame: 1 week
|
Youth will be asked to respond to one question about the likelihood of participating in a clinical trial (i.e., If you were asked to be in a clinical trial, how likely would you be to participate?) using a 5-point Likert scale (1 = Not likely; 5 = Extremely likely).
The minimum scale score was 1 and the maximum scale score was 5. Higher scores indicate increased likelihood of participating in a clinical trial.
|
1 week
|
|
Fear Preventing Participation Scores at 1 Week
Time Frame: 1 week
|
Youth will be asked to respond to one question about the likelihood of their fear preventing them from participating in a clinical trial (i.e., How likely is it that your fearful or anxious feelings could stop you from participating in a clinical trial in the future?) using a 5-point Likert scale (1 = Not likely; 5 = Extremely likely).
The minimum scale score was 1 and the maximum scale score was 5. Higher scores indicate increased likelihood of fear preventing them from participating in a clinical trial.
|
1 week
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
June 30, 2020
Primary Completion (Actual)
July 19, 2020
Study Completion (Actual)
August 2, 2020
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
June 22, 2020
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 24, 2020
First Posted (Actual)
June 25, 2020
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
December 19, 2020
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 23, 2020
Last Verified
November 1, 2020
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- R44NR019565 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Healthy
-
University of Vermont Medical CenterAvocado Nutrition CenterRecruitingHealthy | Healthy Volunteers | Healthy Subjects | Healthy Volunteer | Healthy Adult | Healthy Volunteers Only | Healthy Male and Female Subjects | Healthy Non-smokersUnited States
-
Dragonfly TherapeuticsRecruitingHealthy | Healthy Participants | Healthy Adult Females | Volunteer | Healthy Adult MaleAustralia
-
University of PalermoCompletedHealthy | Healthy Volunteers | Healthy Subjects | Healthy Participants | Static Stretching | Stretch | StretchingItaly
-
Prevent Age Resort "Pervaya Liniya"RecruitingHealthy Aging | Healthy Diet | Healthy LifestyleRussian Federation
-
Yale UniversityNot yet recruitingHealth-related Benefits of Introducing Table Olives Into the Diet of Young Adults: Olives For HealthHealthy Diet | Healthy Lifestyle | Healthy Nutrition | CholesterolUnited States
-
Umm Al-Qura UniversityActive, not recruitingHealthy | Healthy Participants | Healthy Adult | Healthy Women | Healthy Adult Females | Healthy Adult Participants | Healthy Young Adults | Healthy Adult Female Participants | Healthy Adult Male | Poor Sleep Quality | Healthy (Controls) | Poor Sleeping Quality | Healthy Adult Male Subjects | Health Adult SubjectsSaudi Arabia
-
Maastricht University Medical CenterCompletedHealthy Volunteers | Healthy Subjects | Healthy AdultsNetherlands
-
University of PalermoCompletedHealthy Participants | Healthy Adult Participants | Healthy Young AdultsItaly
-
PfizerNot yet recruitingHealthy | Healthy AdultsUnited States
-
RAGE BioRecruitingHealthy | Healthy SmokerAustralia
Clinical Trials on DigiKnowIt News: Teen
-
Innovation Research & TrainingCompletedHealthy | Chronic Illnesses, MultipleUnited States
-
Innovation Research & TrainingNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)Completed
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisWithdrawnThe Study Focus on no Specific ConditionFrance
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisCompletedThe Study Focus on no Specific ConditionFrance
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisWithdrawnThe Study Focus on no Specific ConditionFrance
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisWithdrawnThe Study Focus on no Specific ConditionFrance
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisWithdrawnThe Study Focus on no Specific ConditionFrance
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisWithdrawnThe Study Focus on no Specific ConditionFrance
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisCompletedThe Study Focus on no Specific ConditionFrance
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisWithdrawnThe Study Focus on no Specific ConditionFrance