His-bundle Pacing vs. Right Ventricular Apical Pacing in Patients With Reduced Ejection Fraction (HIS-PrEF)

February 27, 2025 updated by: Region Skane

His-bundle Pacing vs. Right Ventricular Apical Pacing in Patients With Reduced Ejection

The study compares standard right ventricle apical pacing with so called His-bundle pacing, for patients with slightly or moderately reduced ejection fraction and atrioventricular block requiring pacemaker therapy. The primary outcome is left ventricular ejection fraction measured after 6 months.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Patients with reduced systolic ejection fraction (40≤ ejection fraction ≤55%) and pacemaker indication due to high degree AV block are included. The study has a randomized double blinded crossover design. Patients are implanted with a standard right ventricle lead and right atrial lead (if indicated), and in addition a His-bundle lead. Randomization is performed as to which pacing modality is used during the first 6 months. After 6 months the pacing modality is changed. Patients are blinded and endpoint adjudicators, including echocardiography staff, are blinded. Device nurse and physician are not blinded.

Primary endpoint is difference in left ventricular ejection fraction after 6 months, paired comparisons are used and each patient is their own control. Secondary endpoints include complications and safety of the device/electrode, and quality of life.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
40

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 100 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • AV block II or III with high expected pacing need
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction between 40% and 55% (inclusive)
  • Willing to participate and sign informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Under 18 years old
  • Pregnant
  • Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
  • Cardiac sarcoidosis
  • Cardiac amyloidosis
  • Previous myocardial infarction within last 3 months
  • Ventricular septum defect or other other left ventricular corrective surgery
  • Congenital heart disease surgically corrected
  • Atrial fibrillation with uncontrolled rate (if not planned for AV node ablation)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: His-bundle pacing first
Patients are allocated to receive His-bundle pacing for a period of 6 months. Then the patients will cross over to traditional right ventricular (RV) apical pacing for 6 months.
Device: His-bundle pacing

A standard pacing electrode (Medtronic 4076) will be placed in RV apex (or RV septum as a secondary option) and in the right atrial appendage (if indicated).

A dedicated His-bundle pacemaker electrode (Medtronic 3830) will be placed in the region of His bundle, using a dedicated introducer sheath (Medtronic C304 or Medtronic C315). His-bundle potentials will be identified and His-bundle capture (non-selective or selective) will be ascertained using an electrophysiology recording system. Device programming will focus on providing physiological atrioventricular delay and safety RV pacing as backup.
Experimental: RV apical pacing first
Patients are allocated to receive traditional RV apical pacing for a period of 6 months. Then the patients will cross over to His-bundle pacing for 6 months.
Device: His-bundle pacing

A standard pacing electrode (Medtronic 4076) will be placed in RV apex (or RV septum as a secondary option) and in the right atrial appendage (if indicated).

A dedicated His-bundle pacemaker electrode (Medtronic 3830) will be placed in the region of His bundle, using a dedicated introducer sheath (Medtronic C304 or Medtronic C315). His-bundle potentials will be identified and His-bundle capture (non-selective or selective) will be ascertained using an electrophysiology recording system. Device programming will focus on providing physiological atrioventricular delay and safety RV pacing as backup.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ejection Fraction
Time Frame: 6 months
Absolute difference in left ventricular systolic ejection fraction (absolute percent)
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adverse events
Time Frame: 12 months
Percentage of device-related adverse events. Events will be classified as general, associated with His-bundle lead or associated with RV lead
12 months
Left ventricular activation time
Time Frame: 6 months
Total left ventricular mechanical activation time (measured with tissue doppler echocardiography)
6 months
NT-ProBNP
Time Frame: 6 months
Difference in NT-ProBNP levels
6 months
QRS duration
Time Frame: 6 months
Difference in total QRS duration on ECG
6 months
Left Ventricular Activation Time (LVAT)
Time Frame: 6 months
Maximum unipolar spike-to-peak-T-wave in V5-V6
6 months
6 minute walk test
Time Frame: 6 months
Difference in six minute hall walk test (meters)
6 months
Change in quality of life measured by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) mean score
Time Frame: 6 months
Difference in health related quality of life, measured by the SF-36 questionnaire, calculated as difference in mean from baseline to follow-up (calculated using the official scoring algorithm, where each sub scale is assigned a score between 0-100, higher score represents better health)
6 months
Change in quality of life measured by the EuroQol EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire
Time Frame: 6 months
Difference in health related quality of life, measured by the mean score of the EQ-5D (version 5L) questionnaire (totalt score ranging from 5-25 points, higher score represents more health related problems/disability)
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Region Skane

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Rasmus Borgquist, MD PhD, Lund University, Skane University Hospital, Arrhythmia Section, Lund, Sweden

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 24, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 24, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 27, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 27, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • HIS-PrEF_study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure, Systolic

Clinical Trials on His-bundle pacing

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings