Evaluating the Efficacy of the Parent Support Program (PSP)
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
Palo Alto, California, United States, 94304
- Palo Alto University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Must be 18 years of age or older.
- Must live in the United States.
- Must be comfortable communicating in English.
- Must be a parent of a trans child between the ages of 10 - 24.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Participants who participated in pilot study or focus groups related to this project.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
- Masking: NONE
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Immediate Access to Parent Support Program
|
The parent support program includes three modules aimed at increasing knowledge, positive attitudes, and supportive behaviors towards trans youth.
Each online module includes several activities including writing prompts, videos, interactive quizzes, and other educational activities.
|
|
NO_INTERVENTION: Waitlist Control
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Trans-supportive behaviors scale
Time Frame: One month
|
This 20 item questionnaire measures the frequency of supportive behaviors enacted in the past month.
Response options ranged from 1 (never) to 5 (frequently) based on item anchors from the Ryan et al. (2010) measure on family acceptance.
The original 25-item scale was reduced to 20 items based on achieving adequate internal consistency reliability in a previous study with parents of trans youth (Matsuno & Israel, in preparation).
An example item is: "I told my child I respect and support them."
The measure showed adequate internal consistency reliability in the pilot study of the Parent Support Program (α = .8).
|
One month
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Attitudes Toward Trans Youth Scale (ATTYS - Birnkrant, 2018)
Time Frame: One month
|
Two subscales of the original scale were used consisting of 27 items- Genderism, and Fabricated Identity.
The scale had strong reliablity α = .98
and demonstrated convergent and discriminant validity.
|
One month
|
|
Objective knowledge about gender diversity
Time Frame: One month
|
The author created a 18-item measure designed to test knowledge about constructs of gender and experiences of transgender people.
The items are based on the program content and through best practices for creating multiple choice questions.
|
One month
|
|
Subjective knowledge about gender diversity
Time Frame: One month
|
Participants perceptions of their own level knowledge regarding gender diversity will be measured using a 100-point Likert scale from 1 - not at all knowledgeable to 100- extremely knowledgeable.
Participants will be asked to rate their perceived knowledge in the following areas: gender terminology, etiology, medical intervention, and impact of parental acceptance.
|
One month
|
|
Self-compassion
Time Frame: One month
|
Self-compassion was measured by adapting the self-kindness subscale of the Self-Compassion Scale - Short Form (SCS-SF) (Raes, Pommier, Neff, & Van Gucht, 2011).
The subscale demonstrated adequate reliability in a previous sample (α = .78)
(Raes et al., 2011).
The five items were adapted by adding "as a parent of a trans/non-binary child" at the end of each item to measure self-compassion related to parenting a trans child.
Items were rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (almost never) to 5 (almost always).
The measure showed strong internal consistency reliability in the pilot study of the Parent Support Program (α = .94).
|
One month
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Em Matsuno, PhD, Palo Alto University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Study Start
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2019-116
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.