Virtual Reality for Pain Management in Advanced Heart Failure

September 25, 2020 updated by: Medstar Health Research Institute

Pilot Study to Evaluate Virtual Reality for Pain Management in Advanced Heart Failure

The purpose of this research project is to evaluate the impact of virtual reality therapy on mitigating heart failure pain in hospitalized patients with heart failure and compare this impact to that of 2-dimensional guided imagery distraction therapy.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Through ongoing collaborative work between the MedStar Heart and Vascular Institute Advanced Heart Failure clinical team at our hospital and the MedStar Washington Hospital Center Palliative Care team, the research team identifies hospitalized patients with a primary diagnosis of heart failure (ACC/AHA stage C or D). Subjects will be considered for enrollment in this study if able to provide consent, at least 18 years old, and report moderate-severe pain (at least 4 out of 10 where pain is rated on a Likert scale between zero and 10) in the previous 24 hours. Subjects will be excluded if they already use VR for personal use, have intractable nausea/vomiting, history of motion sickness, history of seizures or epilepsy, have cranial structure abnormalities that prevent use of VR headset, are currently enrolled in a palliative care or pain management study, and/or are on contact isolation. Institutional review board approval will be sought and informed consent will be conducted before enrolling every patient.

After consenting to participate, in addition to usual pharmacologic pain management, 128 patients should be randomized with a 1:1 ratio to receive either one 10-minute VR session, or one 10-minute 2-dimensional guided-imagery session.

VR sessions will be administered using the Facebook (Facebook Inc., Menlo Park, CA) Oculus GO VR. The VR software that will be used is the Forest of Serenity (Holosphere VR®, Birmingham, UK) application. The guided-imagery session depicts a peaceful walk through a forest with instrumental background music and 2-dimensional imagery. Patients will watch the guided imagery video on a portable tablet for 10 minutes, the same duration as the VR intervention.

Subjects in both arms will continue to receive standard pharmacologic pain management.

Because of the nature of the compared interventions, subjects and researchers cannot be blinded to intervention. Our primary outcome measure will determine the impact of distraction therapy (either VR therapy or 2-dimensional guided imagery) on self-reported pain experience. Self-reported pain experience remains the standard for clinical pain research. Secondary outcomes will measure impact of each distraction therapy on general distress level, general quality of life, and satisfaction with pain management.

Following consent and randomization, subjects will complete surveys on electronic tablets to provide baseline data on pain scores, general distress, general quality of life, and satisfaction with pain management. Pain will be assessed using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF, modified to assess symptoms in the last 24 hours) that includes a 0-10 Likert scale for self-reported pain as well as information about pain location, quality, and interference of pain on daily living. General distress will be measured using the NCCN Distress Thermometer (a Likert scale measuring from No Distress to Extreme Distress, where "distress" is defined by the patient; we will not include the tool's associated Problem List due to overlap with other survey questions and attempt to avoid survey fatigue). General quality of life will be measured using the Functional Assessment in Chronic Illness-Therapy in Palliative Care 14-item (FACIT-Pal 14) scale that measures non-pain symptoms and general well-being.

After completion of baseline surveys, subjects will be administered either VR therapy for 10 minutes or 2-dimensional guided imagery for 10 minutes. For both arms, a member of the research team will educate the patient on the technology and assure comfort with use, remaining outside the room but nearby during the actual 10 minutes.

Following the distraction therapy, subjects will be re-surveyed BPI-SF, FACIT-Pal 14, and Distress Thermometer (Aim 1). Both groups will also be surveyed regarding acceptance of and satisfaction with the distraction therapy intervention itself and its thematic content (Aim 2). Patients randomized to VR therapy will be surveyed regarding level of immersion of the VR experience. In order to evaluate any residual effects of the distraction therapy, enrollees will be re-surveyed BPI-SF, FACIT-Pal 14, Distress Thermometer, and pain management satisfaction questions on the following day.

Our study will reach 80% power to detect a difference of 1 unit in the pain score measure between the 2 groups using a two-sample t-test with equal variance at a two-sided alpha=0.05 and assuming a within-group standard deviation of 2 for each group. Sample size calculations were conducted in PASS.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
94

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • District of Columbia
      • Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20010
        • Medstar Washington Hospital Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • hospitalized at study institution
  • primary diagnosis of ACC/AHA Stage C or D heart failure
  • reports pain on 0-10 Likert scale at least 4/10 or greater

Exclusion Criteria (any of the following):

  • participant already uses virtual reality for personal use
  • intractable nausea/vomiting
  • history of motion sickness
  • history of seizures or epilepsy
  • have cranial structure abnormalities that prevent use of VR headset
  • currently enrolled in a palliative care or pain management study
  • on contact isolation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Guided imagery
10 minutes of guided imagery (using Apple iPad and headphones, subject watches 10 minute video of a guided-imagery session depicting a peaceful walk through a forest with instrumental background music and 2-dimensional imagery)
Other: Guided imagery
10 minutes of guided imagery experience delivered on tablet
Experimental: Virtual reality
10 minutes of virtual reality (using study-administered Facebook Oculus Go VR headset with headphones, subject engages with VR application Forest of Serenity (Holosphere VR®, Birmingham, UK) that features a forest environment with voice narration that can be played in a seated or fixed position.
Other: Virtual reality
10 minutes of virtual reality experience delivered by Facebook Oculus Go VR device

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Self reported pain score
Time Frame: Immediately after assigned intervention
Likert scale 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain)
Immediately after assigned intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ease of intervention ("How easy was this technology for you to use?") -- this single question designed for this study
Time Frame: Immediately after assigned intervention
Single best answer to this question: subjects choose between "easy," "normal," or "difficult"
Immediately after assigned intervention
Quality of life score
Time Frame: Immediately after assigned intervention
Functional Assessment in Chronic Illness-Therapy in Palliative Care 14-item scale (FACIT Pal 14 scale) -- subject replies to 14 questions about quality of life issues with responses in 5-point Likert scale (0 = not at all; 4 = very much), total score range 0-56
Immediately after assigned intervention
Self reported distress
Time Frame: Immediately after assigned intervention
National Comprehensive Cancer Network Distress Thermometer -- subject rates distress at that point in time on Likert scale 0-10 (0 = no distress; 10 = worst distress)
Immediately after assigned intervention
Acceptability of intervention ("Would you use this intervention again?") -- this single question designed for this study
Time Frame: Immediately after assigned intervention
Single best answer: subjects choose between two choices, "Yes" or "No"
Immediately after assigned intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Medstar Health Research Institute

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Hunter Groninger, MD, Medstar Washington Hospital Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 29, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 3, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 25, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 1, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 1, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 25, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2018-076

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Pain

Clinical Trials on Guided imagery

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings