xSPECT-based Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy: Consistency of Functional Values and Feasibility of Myocardial Uptake Quantitation in Patients With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease (xSPECT MPI)

June 27, 2024 updated by: University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

xSPECT-based Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy: Consistency of Functional Values and Feasibility of Myocardial Uptake Quantitation in Patients With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease (xSPECT MPI Study)

This study is to evaluate the feasibility of myocardial Standardized Uptake Volume (SUV) assessment by means of X- (Single photon emission tomography) SPECT/Computed tomography (CT), to assess normal reference value under rest and stress in a homogeneous population without Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) and to assess the variation of absolute quantitative SUV measurements under rest and stress. The values will be evaluated in comparison with perfusion Positron Emission Tomography (PET)/CT (using 82Rb as perfusion tracer) and CT coronary angiography (CTCA) with contrast medium.).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
52

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Damian Wild, Prof. Dr. med.
  • Phone Number: +41 61 328 66 83
  • Email: damian.wild@ubs.ch

Study Locations

  • Switzerland
      • Basel, Switzerland, 4031
        • Clinic of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Basel

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Referral to non-invasive nuclear ischemia test as part of clinical care
  • Suspected coronary artery disease based on clinical symptoms
  • Informed Consent as documented by signature

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Allergy against adenosine
  • Allergy against iodinated contrast medium
  • Recent myocardial infarction (<1 month)
  • Previous history of coronary revascularization
  • Severe asthma
  • Thyroid hyperfunction
  • atrioventricular block (AV) Block > I grade
  • Arrhythmic cardiopathy
  • Weight >101 Kg.
  • Acute or chronic renal impairment defined as Serum-Creatinine: above 1.5x upper limit of normal (ULN) and/or glomerular filtration rate (GFR) < 30 ml/min
  • Inability to follow the procedures of the study, e.g. due to language problems, psychological disorders, dementia, etc. of the participant,
  • Participation in another study with investigational drug within the 30 days preceding and during the present study,
  • Enrolment of the investigator, his/her family members, employees and other dependent persons,
  • Claustrophobia
  • Intake of caffeine <24 Hours before the first day of examination
  • Enrolment into another study using ionizing radiation within the previous 12 months.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Patients with suspected CAD
Diagnostic test: 99mTc-sestamibi myocardial perfusion SPECT
82Rb-PET/CT with CT based coronary angiography (CCTA) as part of clinical care at Day 1
Diagnostic test: 82Rb-Chloride myocardial perfusion PET with CCTA
stress-rest 99mTc-sestamibi myocardial perfusion SPECT, performed subsequent to 99mTc-sestamibi myocardial perfusion SPECT at Day 2

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Absolute flow quantification (assessed by PET/CT)
Time Frame: 60 minutes at Day 1
Consistency of quantitative parameters assessed by xSPECT compared to the "gold standard" which includes absolute flow quantification (assessed by PET/CT). The feasibility of myocardial SUV assessment by means of X-SPECT/CT will be tested by correlating the automatically calculated values with automatically calculated, PET-derived absolute blood flows. Rationale: values of quantified myocardial uptake are expected to be reliable the more they correlate with absolutely quantified myocardial blood flow in the myocardium, given the expected proportionality between uptake and subtending coronary blood flow.
60 minutes at Day 1
presence of significant coronary stenoses (CTCA)
Time Frame: 120 minutes at Day 2
Consistency of quantitative parameters assessed by xSPECT compared to the "gold standard" which includes the presence of significant coronary stenoses (CTCA). Normal reference values under rest and stress in a homogeneous population without CAD will be evaluated in comparison with perfusion 82Rb-PET/CT and CT coronary angiography (CTCA) with contrast medium. Rationale: a coronary artery disease can be ruled out in patients with normal 82Rb-PET and without detectable stenoses on CTCA, thus identifying a subpopulation of normal patients, wherein reference normal values can be provided.
120 minutes at Day 2

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Determination of uptake patterns that are suggestive for CAD
Time Frame: one point assessment after interventions at day 2

Values of quantified myocardial uptake (SUV) will be identified and correlated to pathological perfusion patterns as determined by 82Rb-PET/CT.

Rationale: it is expected that patients with pathological PET imaging and reduced flow rates also present with reduced myocardial uptake of 99mTc-sestamibi.
one point assessment after interventions at day 2
Quantitative 99mTC-sestamibi uptake values of the whole myocardium
Time Frame: one point assessment after interventions at day 2
Quantitative 99mTC-sestamibi uptake values of the whole myocardium, analysis of the diagnostic accuracy. Values will be correlated to image-driven diagnosis of CAD Rationale: it is foreseen that a diagnosis can be provided by finding reduced myocardial uptake of 99mTc-sestamibi
one point assessment after interventions at day 2
Comparison of PET/CT, standard Myocardial perfusion SPECT (MPS) and new quantitative 99mTc-sestamibi xSPECT/quantitative computerized tomography (QCT) in the same patient
Time Frame: one point assessment after interventions at day 2

Comparison of sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of PET/CT, standard MPS and new quantitative 99mTc-sestamibi xSPECT/QCT in the same patient. Using the final clinical diagnosis of CAD, the diagnostic accuracy of each methodology will be tested by means of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

Rationale: it is expected that a quantitative approach can increase the diagnostic accuracy of SPECT by enhancing its sensitivity in case of globally reduced myocardial perfusion, similarly to what gained by quantitative PET
one point assessment after interventions at day 2
Interobserver variability of all imaging modalities
Time Frame: one point assessment after interventions at day 2

Interobserver variability of all imaging modalities. A kappa- correlation coefficient will be calculated for all three modalities.

Rationale: the quantitative data should provide higher interobserver consistency in the evaluation of patients with suspected CAD with SPECT, thus allowing for similar variability compared to quantitative PET.
one point assessment after interventions at day 2
Interobserver variability of qualitative and quantitative assessments
Time Frame: one point assessment after interventions at day 2

Interobserver variability of qualitative and quantitative assessments: a kappa correlation coefficient will be evaluated.

Rationale: the quantitative data should provide higher interobserver consistency in the evaluation of patients with suspected CAD
one point assessment after interventions at day 2

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Siemens Corporation, Corporate Technology

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Federico Caobelli, Dr. med., Clinic of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 7, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 28, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 28, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 28, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 5, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 12, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 28, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 27, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2020-02090, qu20Caobelli

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings