xSPECT-based Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy: Consistency of Functional Values and Feasibility of Myocardial Uptake Quantitation in Patients With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease (xSPECT MPI)

December 7, 2021 updated by: University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

xSPECT-based Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy: Consistency of Functional Values and Feasibility of Myocardial Uptake Quantitation in Patients With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease (xSPECT MPI Study)

This study is to evaluate the feasibility of myocardial Standardized Uptake Volume (SUV) assessment by means of X- (Single photon emission tomography) SPECT/Computed tomography (CT), to assess normal reference value under rest and stress in a homogeneous population without Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) and to assess the variation of absolute quantitative SUV measurements under rest and stress. The values will be evaluated in comparison with perfusion Positron Emission Tomography (PET)/CT (using 82Rb as perfusion tracer) and CT coronary angiography (CTCA) with contrast medium.).

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Damian Wild, Prof. Dr. med.
  • Phone Number: +41 61 328 66 83
  • Email: damian.wild@ubs.ch

Study Locations

      • Basel, Switzerland, 4031
        • Recruiting
        • Clinic of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Basel
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Michael Zellweger, Prof. Dr. med.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Referral to non-invasive nuclear ischemia test as part of clinical care
  • Suspected coronary artery disease based on clinical symptoms
  • Informed Consent as documented by signature

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Allergy against adenosine
  • Allergy against iodinated contrast medium
  • Recent myocardial infarction (<1 month)
  • Previous history of coronary revascularization
  • Severe asthma
  • Thyroid hyperfunction
  • atrioventricular block (AV) Block > I grade
  • Arrhythmic cardiopathy
  • Weight >101 Kg.
  • Acute or chronic renal impairment defined as Serum-Creatinine: above 1.5x upper limit of normal (ULN) and/or glomerular filtration rate (GFR) < 30 ml/min
  • Inability to follow the procedures of the study, e.g. due to language problems, psychological disorders, dementia, etc. of the participant,
  • Participation in another study with investigational drug within the 30 days preceding and during the present study,
  • Enrolment of the investigator, his/her family members, employees and other dependent persons,
  • Claustrophobia
  • Intake of caffeine <24 Hours before the first day of examination
  • Enrolment into another study using ionizing radiation within the previous 12 months.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: DIAGNOSTIC
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Patients with suspected CAD
82Rb-PET/CT with CT based coronary angiography (CCTA) as part of clinical care at Day 1
stress-rest 99mTc-sestamibi myocardial perfusion SPECT, performed subsequent to 99mTc-sestamibi myocardial perfusion SPECT at Day 2

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Absolute flow quantification (assessed by PET/CT)
Time Frame: 60 minutes at Day 1
Consistency of quantitative parameters assessed by xSPECT compared to the "gold standard" which includes absolute flow quantification (assessed by PET/CT). The feasibility of myocardial SUV assessment by means of X-SPECT/CT will be tested by correlating the automatically calculated values with automatically calculated, PET-derived absolute blood flows. Rationale: values of quantified myocardial uptake are expected to be reliable the more they correlate with absolutely quantified myocardial blood flow in the myocardium, given the expected proportionality between uptake and subtending coronary blood flow.
60 minutes at Day 1
presence of significant coronary stenoses (CTCA)
Time Frame: 120 minutes at Day 2
Consistency of quantitative parameters assessed by xSPECT compared to the "gold standard" which includes the presence of significant coronary stenoses (CTCA). Normal reference values under rest and stress in a homogeneous population without CAD will be evaluated in comparison with perfusion 82Rb-PET/CT and CT coronary angiography (CTCA) with contrast medium. Rationale: a coronary artery disease can be ruled out in patients with normal 82Rb-PET and without detectable stenoses on CTCA, thus identifying a subpopulation of normal patients, wherein reference normal values can be provided.
120 minutes at Day 2

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Determination of uptake patterns that are suggestive for CAD
Time Frame: one point assessment after interventions at day 2

Values of quantified myocardial uptake (SUV) will be identified and correlated to pathological perfusion patterns as determined by 82Rb-PET/CT.

Rationale: it is expected that patients with pathological PET imaging and reduced flow rates also present with reduced myocardial uptake of 99mTc-sestamibi.

one point assessment after interventions at day 2
Quantitative 99mTC-sestamibi uptake values of the whole myocardium
Time Frame: one point assessment after interventions at day 2
Quantitative 99mTC-sestamibi uptake values of the whole myocardium, analysis of the diagnostic accuracy. Values will be correlated to image-driven diagnosis of CAD Rationale: it is foreseen that a diagnosis can be provided by finding reduced myocardial uptake of 99mTc-sestamibi
one point assessment after interventions at day 2
Comparison of PET/CT, standard Myocardial perfusion SPECT (MPS) and new quantitative 99mTc-sestamibi xSPECT/quantitative computerized tomography (QCT) in the same patient
Time Frame: one point assessment after interventions at day 2

Comparison of sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of PET/CT, standard MPS and new quantitative 99mTc-sestamibi xSPECT/QCT in the same patient. Using the final clinical diagnosis of CAD, the diagnostic accuracy of each methodology will be tested by means of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

Rationale: it is expected that a quantitative approach can increase the diagnostic accuracy of SPECT by enhancing its sensitivity in case of globally reduced myocardial perfusion, similarly to what gained by quantitative PET

one point assessment after interventions at day 2
Interobserver variability of all imaging modalities
Time Frame: one point assessment after interventions at day 2

Interobserver variability of all imaging modalities. A kappa- correlation coefficient will be calculated for all three modalities.

Rationale: the quantitative data should provide higher interobserver consistency in the evaluation of patients with suspected CAD with SPECT, thus allowing for similar variability compared to quantitative PET.

one point assessment after interventions at day 2
Interobserver variability of qualitative and quantitative assessments
Time Frame: one point assessment after interventions at day 2

Interobserver variability of qualitative and quantitative assessments: a kappa correlation coefficient will be evaluated.

Rationale: the quantitative data should provide higher interobserver consistency in the evaluation of patients with suspected CAD

one point assessment after interventions at day 2

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Federico Caobelli, Dr. med., Clinic of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

December 7, 2021

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

February 1, 2024

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

February 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 28, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 5, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

October 12, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

December 8, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 7, 2021

Last Verified

December 1, 2021

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coronary Artery Disease

Clinical Trials on 99mTc-sestamibi myocardial perfusion SPECT

3
Subscribe