Improving Quality of Life in Early Parkinson's Disease (PD QOL)

October 15, 2020 updated by: Mandar Jog, Western University, Canada

The Effects of Mood Symptoms Treatment on Quality of Life and Motor Function in de Novo Parkinson's Disease Patients

The study will examine 30 patients between ages 50-80, newly diagnosed with early-stage Parkinson's Disease. Patients will be randomized to receive either Citalopram or Carbidopa-levodopa. The investigators' primary outcome measure will be change in quality of life over a prospective period of 6 months. Secondary outcome measures will include change in mood state and motor symptoms, as well as comparison of improvement between two treatments.

Primary investigators would also like to collect quantitative electroencephalogram (qEEG) recordings, which is a reading of brain activity as an additional interest of this study. Primary investigators will assess the qEEG recordings for electrophysiological findings before and after interventions.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
30

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged 50-80 years of age presenting with diagnoses of early stage Parkinson's Disease (UPDRS part III score <20) without a previous treatment trial of either antidepressants or levodopa and able to provide consent.
  • Screened positive with depressive symptoms suggestive of an underlying mild to moderate major depressive episode on the PHQ-9 (scores 10-20).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Currently taking an antidepressant (SSRI, SNRI, TCA, MAOi), antipsychotic, or dopaminergic Parkinson medication, or in the last 8 months.
  • Tremor with a UPDRS-part III score of 3 or more.
  • Currently participating in another clinical trial, which might directly influence findings of this study.
  • Inability to provide informed consent.
  • Dementia as defined by Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score of <24 and/or clinical evidence of dementia.
  • A lifetime diagnosis of another mental disorder including bipolar I or II disorder, schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, schizophreniform disorder, delusional disorder, moderate and severe alcohol use disorder as per chart review or patient self-report.
  • High risk of suicide (e.g. active suicidal ideation and/or current/recent intent or plan) as per self-report or relevant item on the PHQ-9.
  • Non-correctable clinically significant sensory impairment.
  • Unstable medical illnesses including delirium, uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia or cerebrovascular or cardiovascular risk factors that are not under medical management, including QTc>480 on Electrocardiogram.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Carbidopa-Levodopa
Patients will be randomized to any of the 2 arms. In Levodopa/carbidopa arm, patients will be taking Carbidopa-Levodopa (25-100mg) three times a day for the duration of the study.
Drug: Carbidopa-Levodopa 25 Mg-100 Mg Oral Tablet
25mg-100mg tablets to be taken orally three times a day on an empty stomach
Other Names:
  • Sinemet
  • L-DOPA
  • l-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine
Experimental: Citalopram
Patients will be randomized to any of the 2 arms. In Citalopram arm, patients will be taking Citalopram (20mg) daily for the duration of the study.
Drug: Citalopram
20 mg tablet to be taken orally once and at the same time of the day, daily.
Other Names:
  • Celexa

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference between two arms in change of Short Form-36 (SF-36) scores
Time Frame: 6 months
Using a 6-month Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) intervention study, assess whether Citalopram can improve Quality Of Life (QOL) significantly more than carbidopa-levodopa in early stage Parkinson's disease. This will be measured as a change in SF-36 scores, where the lower scores are associated with more disability. Scores range from 0-100.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) part III motor examination within Citalopram group
Time Frame: 6 months
Using a 6-months RCT intervention study, assess whether citalopram can improve motor function in early stage Parkinson's disease. Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part III motor examination indicates higher scores to be associated with more disability. Score ranges from 0 to 132.
6 months
Difference between two arms in change of Unified Parkinson's Desease Rating Scale (UPDRS) part III motor examination
Time Frame: 6 months
Using a 6-months RCT intervention study, assess whether citalopram can improve motor function equally or significantly more than carbidopa-levodopa in early stage Parkinson's disease.Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part III motor examination indicates higher scores to be associated with more disability. Score ranges from 0 to 132
6 months
Difference between two arms in change of Patient Health Questionnaire -9 (PHQ-9) score
Time Frame: 6 months
Using a 6-months RCT intervention study, assess whether citalopram can improve mood symptoms equally or significantly more than carbidopa-levodopa in early stage Parkinson's disease. Patient Health Questionnaire -9 (PHQ-9) higher score is associated with more disability. Scores range from 0-27.
6 months

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
quantitative Electroencephalography (qEEG)
Time Frame: at baseline and at 6 months
Network fragmentation will be analyzed by 5 mins of resting quantitative Electroencephalography (EEG), pre (baseline) and post (6-month followup) treatment. All frequency bands will be analyzed.
at baseline and at 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Western University, Canada

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 17, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 15, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 19, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 19, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 15, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 6450

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings