Objective Assessment of Behavioural Disorders in PD (TECHNO-PARK)

November 4, 2024 updated by: Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern

Objective Assessment of Behavioural Disorders in Parkinson's Disease

The aim of this project is to measure behavioural disorders in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients in a more objective way, in order to facilitate the detection of those symptoms and improve the treatment of non-motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

Apathy and impulse control disorders (ICDs) are frequent non-motor symptoms of PD and negatively affect the quality of life of patients. Although healthcare professionals have begun to understand the extent of the problem faced by those suffering apathy or ICDs, accurate diagnosis is still difficult, as behavioural symptoms are often multidimensional, develop gradually over the course of months and clinical staff have to rely on the self-report of the patient or the report of a family member to assess them. To overcome this issue, the investigators aim to use information and communication technologies to measure apathy and hyperdopaminergic behaviours in PD patients with STN-DBS in an objective way, with the ultimate goal of improving the management of PD patients with STN-DBS.

To do so, the investigators will use three computer-based tasks that measure effort-based decision making and emotion processing in PD patients, and assess motor, cognitive and neuropsychiatric symptoms in parallel with scales and tests. In some select patients, motor symptoms and activity patterns will be monitored with an in-home sensor system before and after deep brain stimulation STN-DBS, and the above mentioned procedures will be repeated 4 months after STN-DBS.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
45

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Switzerland
      • Bern, Switzerland, CH-3010
        • Insel Gruppe AG University Hospital of Bern

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients diagnosed with idiopathic Parkinson's disease, treated at the movement disorders clinic in the University Hospital of Bern, Switzerland.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed with Parkinson's disease.
  • (Planned) STN-DBS.
  • Able to understand instructions and provide informed consent.
  • Native speaking or proficient French or German
  • Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) with score ≥ 22
  • Ability to manipulate handheld dynamometers

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Disease affecting the brain other than Parkinson's disease
  • Suffering from or diagnosed with ongoing psychiatric illnesses
  • Severe somatic illnesses leading to reduced life expectancy
  • Severe physical disability leading to impairment in basic functional activities
  • Participation in a pharmacological study
  • Inability to provide informed consent (legal guardianship)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
PD patients with apathy
PD patients with apathy according to the diagnostic criteria by Robert et al. 2018
PD patients with impulse control disorder
PD patients with a) at least one item >2 or b) at least two items >1 on the hyperdopaminergic subscale of the Ardouin Scale of Behaviour in Parkinson's Disease
PD patients without any relevant neuropsychiatric symptoms
PD patients with a score <2 on each item of the Ardouin Scale of Behaviour in Parkinson's Disease

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Performance in an effort-based decision making task (Apple Tree Paradigm)
Time Frame: Visit 1 (only visit for most patients; for DBS patients 1-3 months before DBS-surgery)
Decision (yes/no)
Visit 1 (only visit for most patients; for DBS patients 1-3 months before DBS-surgery)
Performance in an effort-based decision making task (Apple Tree Paradigm)
Time Frame: Visit 2 (only for DBS patients; 4-6 months after DBS-surgery)
Decision (yes/no)
Visit 2 (only for DBS patients; 4-6 months after DBS-surgery)
Performance in an emotion processing task
Time Frame: Visit 1 (only visit for most patients; for DBS patients 1-3 months before DBS-surgery)
Pupil diameter (in mm)
Visit 1 (only visit for most patients; for DBS patients 1-3 months before DBS-surgery)
Performance in an emotion processing task
Time Frame: Visit 2 (only for DBS patients; 4-6 months after DBS-surgery)
Pupil diameter (in mm)
Visit 2 (only for DBS patients; 4-6 months after DBS-surgery)
Change in overall activity from Baseline to 4 months after DBS-surgery
Time Frame: In-home sensor measurements will be collected from 1-3 months before DBS-surgery and 4 months after DBS-surgery
Changes in overall activity patterns related to motivated behaviours (measured in minutes per day) will be deducted from collected from in-home sensor data using signal processing and machine learning algorithms
In-home sensor measurements will be collected from 1-3 months before DBS-surgery and 4 months after DBS-surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
University of Oxford
University of Bern

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Paul Krack, MD, Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 15, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 26, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 2, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 6, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 4, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2020-01777

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings