Evaluation of the Effect of Root Canal Shaping With TruNatomy on Postoperative Pain and Operative Torque Generated During Instrumentation
Evaluation of the Effect of Root Canal Shaping With TruNatomy on Postoperative Pain and Operative Torque Generated During Instrumentation: A Randomized Clinical Trial
The aim of the present study is to compare the effect of canal shaping using TruNatomy and RaCe rotary systems in bi-rooted maxillary premolars in terms of:
- Post operative pain: incidence and intensity
- Real time torque generated during mechanical instrumentation using real time torque motoring endodontic motor
- Time needed for the instruments to reach to the full working length
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Tarek Ali e mosalamy, MSc
- Phone Number: 002 01000089261
- Email: Tarek072501@gmail.com
Study Locations
-
-
-
Cairo, Egypt, 11553
- Cairo University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients who are free from any physical or mental handicapping condition and no contributory systemic disease.
- Age between 30-60 years old.
- Males & Females.
- Patients' acceptance for participating in the trial through an informed consent
Maxillary permanent premolar teeth:
- Diagnosed clinically and radiographically with pulp necrosis
- With or without periapical radiolucency
- Negative response of pulp tissue to thermal and electric pulp tester
- Possessing two independent roots each having a type I canal
- Patent canals with no internal calcification or resorptive lesions
- Fully formed roots
- Root curvatures less than 30
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patient with contributory medical condition
- Badly destructed teeth
- Patients with pre-operative pain
- Patients having significant systemic disorders
- Patients with two or more adjacent teeth requiring root canal therapy
- Patients who had received antibiotics in the last month
Teeth presenting with:
- Positive response to thermal or electric pulp tester
- History of trauma or previous endodontic treatment
- Immature or open apices
- Association with acute periapical abscess and swelling or fistulous tract
- Fused roots at any level
- Canals larger than size 15# K-file
- Periodontonal/ endodontic lesions
- Mobility higher than grade I
- Radiographic evidence of external or internal root resorption vertical root fracture, perforation, calcification.
- Severe root curvature (>30)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Root canal treatment using RaCe rotary system
Canal shaping using RaCe rotary system powered with endodontic motor with real time torque monitoring capacity
|
Race rotary files will be used for the process of cleaning and shaping of the root canal system
|
|
Experimental: Root canal treatment using TruNatomy rotary system
Canal shaping using TruNatomy rotary system powered with endodontic motor with real time torque monitoring capacity
|
Trunatomy rotary files will be used for the process of cleaning and shaping of the root canal system
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Post operative pain using visual analogue scale
Time Frame: at 24 hours post treatment
|
pain after treatment would be measured with a VAS scale from 0-10 cm with zero representing the least amount of pain and 10 representing the worst pain possible
|
at 24 hours post treatment
|
|
Post operative pain using visual analogue scale
Time Frame: at 48 hours post treatment
|
pain after treatment would be measured with a VAS scale from 0-10 cm with zero representing the least amount of pain and 10 representing the worst pain possible
|
at 48 hours post treatment
|
|
Post operative pain using visual analogue scale
Time Frame: at 72 hours post treatment
|
pain after treatment would be measured with a VAS scale from 0-10 cm with zero representing the least amount of pain and 10 representing the worst pain possible
|
at 72 hours post treatment
|
|
Post operative pain using visual analogue scale
Time Frame: at 1 week post treatment
|
pain after treatment would be measured with a VAS scale from 0-10 cm with zero representing the least amount of pain and 10 representing the worst pain possible
|
at 1 week post treatment
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
operative torque generated during instrumentation
Time Frame: during treatment
|
real time operative torque exerted on the instrument through out the shaping process and until the instrument reaches the full working length will be measured using a torque measuring motor in real time
|
during treatment
|
|
time required for the instrument to reach the full working length
Time Frame: during treatment
|
time required for the the instrument to reach the full length and complete the shaping process will be calculated using a Realtime torque motoring motor
|
during treatment
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Gambarini G, Galli M, Seracchiani M, Di Nardo D, Versiani MA, Piasecki L, Testarelli L. In Vivo Evaluation of Operative Torque Generated by Two Nickel-Titanium Rotary Instruments during Root Canal Preparation. Eur J Dent. 2019 Oct;13(4):556-562. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1698369. Epub 2019 Dec 31.
- Zand V, Milani AS, Hassani Dehkharghani A, Rahbar M, Tehranchi P. Treatment of Necrotic Teeth Using Two Engine-Driven Systems and Patient's Postoperative Pain: A Double-Blind Clinical Trial. Iran Endod J. 2016 Fall;11(4):267-272. doi: 10.22037/iej.2016.3.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- ENDO:3-3-5 (8-10-2020)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.