The Effect of Body Mass Index (BMI) on Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation Outcome: A Prospective Study From an East-Asian Cohort

November 10, 2020 updated by: Jong Sze Chin, Tan Tock Seng Hospital
Research has shown that rehabilitation at almost any Body Mass Index (BMI) level leads to positive functional outcomes. Some data demonstrating that gains are often more rapid at BMI above "normal". The aim of this study is to investigate the association between BMI and the functional progress of all patients admitted to Tan Tock Seng Tertiary Rehabilitation Center.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
247

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Singapore
      • Singapore, Singapore, 570186
        • Tan Tock Seng Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All patient admitted to Tan Tock Seng Tertiary Rehabilitation Centre and fulfilled the inclusion criteria within the study period will be consented to the study.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • clinical strokes (ischaemic or haemorrhagic) diagnosed by acute neurologists or neurosurgeons and confirmed on computerized tomography (CT) or Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain imaging
  • aged 18 years and above
  • admitted directly from acute stroke units
  • able to provide informed consent by self or by next of kin in incompetence patient
  • must receive physical therapy (either physiotherapy, occupational therapy or speech therapy) at least 5 times a week with each session at least 30 minutes

Exclusion Criteria:

  • rehabilitation was not the primary reason for the inpatient admission
  • failure to complete the rehabilitation program due to either an acute transfer off rehabilitation or a discharge against medical advice
  • incomplete or missing Body Mass Index (BMI) or Functional Independence Measure (FIM) data
  • patients who were not of Asian ethnicity

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Functional Independence Measure (FIM) on Admission
Time Frame: Functional Independence Measure (FIM) was measured within 72 hours of admission
Functional Independence Measure (FIM), the main primary outcome measure during rehabilitation was measured within 72 hours of admission and discharge by rehabilitation therapists all of whom were trained and certified in the use of the FIM. The FIM is an 18-item instrument comprising 13 motor items and 5 cognitive items, with each item graded on a 7-point ordinal scale (1 denotes complete dependence and 7 denotes complete independence), including the ability to perform activities of daily living (ADLs) across 6 areas (self-care, sphincter control, transfers, locomotion, communication, and social cognition). Total admission FIM (Ta-FIM) scores, total discharge FIM (Td-FIM) scores (18 - 126), motor FIM (m-FIM) sub-scores (13 - 91) and cognitive FIM (c-FIM) sub-scores (5 - 35), were tabulated.
Functional Independence Measure (FIM) was measured within 72 hours of admission
Functional Independence Measure (FIM) on Discharge
Time Frame: Functional Independence Measure (FIM) was measured within 72 hours of discharge.
Functional Independence Measure (FIM), the main primary outcome measure during rehabilitation was measured within 72 hours of admission and discharge by rehabilitation therapists all of whom were trained and certified in the use of the FIM. The FIM is an 18-item instrument comprising 13 motor items and 5 cognitive items, with each item graded on a 7-point ordinal scale (1 denotes complete dependence and 7 denotes complete independence), including the ability to perform activities of daily living (ADLs) across 6 areas (self-care, sphincter control, transfers, locomotion, communication, and social cognition). Total admission FIM (Ta-FIM) scores, total discharge FIM (Td-FIM) scores (18 - 126), motor FIM (m-FIM) sub-scores (13 - 91) and cognitive FIM (c-FIM) sub-scores (5 - 35), were tabulated.
Functional Independence Measure (FIM) was measured within 72 hours of discharge.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Functional Independence Measure (FIM) Gain
Time Frame: Within 72 hours
Mean FIM gain, calculated as [Td-FIM - Ta-FIM] points
Within 72 hours
Mean Functional Independence Measure (FIM) efficiency
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Mean FIM efficiency, calculated as [FIM gain]/ [rehabilitation length of stay (days)]
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Mean Functional Independence Measure (FIM) effectiveness
Time Frame: Within 72 hours
Mean FIM effectiveness was calculated as FIM gain/(126 points-FIM admission scores) with a value of 0-1.
Within 72 hours
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Time Frame: Within 72 hours
All patients had their weight (in kilograms) and height (in meters) measured on admission and discharge by rehabilitation nurses 72 hours after rehabilitation admission and prior to planned rehabilitation discharge. Weight was measured via sitting weighing scales or platform weighing scale for bedbound patients while height was measured with height measuring scale or measured in a supine position with legs outstretched and feet in dorsiflexion at end of bed for bedbound patients. BMI is then calculated as weight /height in meters squared.
Within 72 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Tan Tock Seng Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: SZE CHIN JONG, MD, Tan Tock Seng Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 31, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 30, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 30, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 10, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 12, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 12, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 10, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • NHG-DSRB 2018/01084

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings