Promoting Healing of Nerves Through Electrical Stimulation (PHONES)
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Eric Walker, PhD
- Phone Number: 101 216-378-9107
- Email: ewalker@checkpointsurgical.com
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
Stanford, California, United States, 94304
- Stanford University
-
-
Illinois
-
Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
- Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine - Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
-
-
Missouri
-
Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
- Washington University in St. Louis
-
-
Ohio
-
Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43212
- The Ohio State Univeristy - Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
-
-
Wisconsin
-
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States, 53226
- Medical College of Wisconsin - Hand Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Electrodiagnostic evidence of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow.
- Are candidates for surgical intervention.
- Evidence of motor involvement such as intrinsic muscle atrophy or weakness.
- Are age 18-80 years.
- Signed and dated informed consent form.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Severe comorbid condition, such as arrythmia or congestive heart failure, preventing surgery
- Previous history or current transection of ulnar nerve, or concomitant upper extremity nerve injury
- Global peripheral neuropathy affecting the hands
- Age less than 18 or greater than 80 years
- Un-affected hand maximum grip strength <12kg
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Brief Electrical Stimulation
Single, 10 minute dose of electrical stimulation delivered to the ulnar nerve during surgical intervention for cubital tunnel decompression.
|
Single use medical device, consisting of electric stimulator and intraoperative lead. Therapy consists of single, 10 minute dose delivered proximal to site of decompression/repair. Other Name: Checkpoint BEST System
Other Names:
|
|
No Intervention: Standard of Care
Surgical intervention for cubital tunnel decompression.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Grip Strength at 1 year.
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Change in grip strength at 1 year from baseline (pre-operative) assessment.
|
1 year
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Grip Strength
Time Frame: Pre-surgery, 6 weeks, 3 months, 5 months, 7 months, 9 months, and 1 year
|
Maximum grip strength
|
Pre-surgery, 6 weeks, 3 months, 5 months, 7 months, 9 months, and 1 year
|
|
Lateral Pinch Strength
Time Frame: Pre-surgery, 6 weeks, 3 months, 5 months, 7 months, 9 months, and 1 year
|
Maximum lateral pinch strength
|
Pre-surgery, 6 weeks, 3 months, 5 months, 7 months, 9 months, and 1 year
|
|
2-point discrimination
Time Frame: Pre-surgery, 6 weeks, 3 months, 5 months, 7 months, 9 months, and 1 year
|
Evaluation of sensory function, measuring tactile discrimination.
|
Pre-surgery, 6 weeks, 3 months, 5 months, 7 months, 9 months, and 1 year
|
|
Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament Testing
Time Frame: Pre-surgery, 6 weeks, 3 months, 5 months, 7 months, 9 months, and 1 year
|
Evaluation of sensory function, measuring pressure detection threshold.
|
Pre-surgery, 6 weeks, 3 months, 5 months, 7 months, 9 months, and 1 year
|
|
Medical Research Council (MRC) motor grading.
Time Frame: Pre-surgery, 6 weeks, 3 months, 5 months, 7 months, 9 months, and 1 year
|
Grading of muscle strength on 0 to 5 scale, with higher score representing greater function.
|
Pre-surgery, 6 weeks, 3 months, 5 months, 7 months, 9 months, and 1 year
|
|
Maximal finger spread measurement.
Time Frame: Pre-surgery, 6 weeks, 3 months, 5 months, 7 months, 9 months, and 1 year
|
Measurement of maximal finger spread.
|
Pre-surgery, 6 weeks, 3 months, 5 months, 7 months, 9 months, and 1 year
|
|
Patient Reported Outcome Measurement System (PROMIS) Upper Extremity Function
Time Frame: Pre-surgery, 10 days, 6 weeks, 3 months, 5 months, 7 months, 9 months, and 1 year
|
Questionnaire providing patient reported estimate of upper extremity function on a 0-100 scale with >50 representing greater normal function.
|
Pre-surgery, 10 days, 6 weeks, 3 months, 5 months, 7 months, 9 months, and 1 year
|
|
Patient Reported Outcome Measurement System (PROMIS) Pain Interference
Time Frame: Pre-surgery, 10 days, 6 weeks, 3 months, 5 months, 7 months, 9 months, and 1 year
|
Questionnaire providing patient reported estimate of interference of pain on daily activities on a 0-100 scale with >50 representing greater than normal pain interference on daily activities.
|
Pre-surgery, 10 days, 6 weeks, 3 months, 5 months, 7 months, 9 months, and 1 year
|
|
Michigan Hand Questionnaire (MHQ)
Time Frame: Pre-surgery, 10 days, 6 weeks, 3 months, 5 months, 7 months, 9 months, and 1 year
|
MHQ is a patient reported estimate of hand function on a 0-100 scale with a higher number indication greater hand function.
|
Pre-surgery, 10 days, 6 weeks, 3 months, 5 months, 7 months, 9 months, and 1 year
|
|
Nerve Conduction Velocity (NCV)
Time Frame: Pre-surgery, 3 months, and 7 months
|
Measurement of how quickly an electrical impulse moves along the nerve.
|
Pre-surgery, 3 months, and 7 months
|
|
Electromyography (EMG)
Time Frame: Pre-surgery, 3 months, and 7 months
|
Measurement of the electrical activity in a muscle.
|
Pre-surgery, 3 months, and 7 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Amy M Moore, MD, The Ohio State Univeristy Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Power HA, Morhart MJ, Olson JL, Chan KM. Postsurgical Electrical Stimulation Enhances Recovery Following Surgery for Severe Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. Neurosurgery. 2020 Jun 1;86(6):769-777. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyz322.
- Gordon T, Amirjani N, Edwards DC, Chan KM. Brief post-surgical electrical stimulation accelerates axon regeneration and muscle reinnervation without affecting the functional measures in carpal tunnel syndrome patients. Exp Neurol. 2010 May;223(1):192-202. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2009.09.020. Epub 2009 Oct 1.
- Jo S, Pan D, Halevi AE, Roh J, Schellhardt L, Hunter Ra DA, Snyder-Warwick AK, Moore AM, Mackinnon SE, Wood MD. Comparing electrical stimulation and tacrolimus (FK506) to enhance treating nerve injuries. Muscle Nerve. 2019 Nov;60(5):629-636. doi: 10.1002/mus.26659. Epub 2019 Aug 21.
- Sayanagi J, Acevedo-Cintron JA, Pan D, Schellhardt L, Hunter DA, Snyder-Warwick AK, Mackinnon SE, Wood MD. Brief Electrical Stimulation Accelerates Axon Regeneration and Promotes Recovery Following Nerve Transection and Repair in Mice. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 Oct 20;103(20):e80. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.01965.
- Roh J, Schellhardt L, Keane GC, Hunter DA, Moore AM, Snyder-Warwick AK, Mackinnon SE, Wood MD. Short-Duration, Pulsatile, Electrical Stimulation Therapy Accelerates Axon Regeneration and Recovery following Tibial Nerve Injury and Repair in Rats. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022 Apr 1;149(4):681e-690e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000008924.
- Evans A, Padovano WM, Patterson JMM, Wood MD, Fongsri W, Kennedy CR, Mackinnon SE. Beyond the Cubital Tunnel: Use of Adjunctive Procedures in the Management of Cubital Tunnel Syndrome. Hand (N Y). 2023 Mar;18(2):203-213. doi: 10.1177/1558944721998022. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
- Saffari TM, Walker ER, Pet MA, Moore AM. Brief Intraoperative Electrical Stimulation to Enhance Nerve Regeneration. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Apr 10;12(4):e5730. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005730. eCollection 2024 Apr. No abstract available.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 0153-CSP-001
- W81XWH1920065 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Department of Defense USAMRAA)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.