Dual Mobility Cup Versus Unipolar Cup

March 24, 2023 updated by: Northern Orthopaedic Division, Denmark

Risk of Dislocation After Total Hip Replacement: Dual Mobility Cup vs. Unipolar Cup. A Randomized Controlled Trial With Patients ≥65 Years Operated for Hip Osteoarthritis With Primary Total Hip Replacement (THR).

The general purpose of this study is to examine whether the dual mobility cup (Novae® Serf) reduces the number of hip dislocations after total hip replacement, both early dislocation (≤1 year) and late dislocation (>1 year) after primary THR compared with a conventional cup design (Trabecular MetalTM Modular Acetabular System).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Surgery with THR for arthritis and other hip disorders has long been one of the most successful orthopedic surgical treatments. The majority of the patients gain pain relief and experience improved hip function. In 2017, a total of 10,691 THRs were implanted in Denmark (annual report 2018).

Hip dislocation is a known complication after THR. It is a painful condition which may have far-reaching consequences for the patient, who may experience both physical and mental discomfort. Ultimately, multiple hip dislocations may result in reoperation.

In the literature, the incidence of hip dislocation is reported at 2-6 %, and a more recent review reports a risk of 0.5-10 %.

In Denmark, recurrent hip dislocation is the cause of 21 % of the reoperations per year according to The Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register. According to the British National Joint Registry (NJR) and the Australian register (AOANJRR), hip dislocation is the cause of 15.5 % and 21 %, respectively, of the reoperations.

The best method to avoid reoperation due to instability is to choose the correct implant for the individual patient and thereby spare the patient of having to endure a painful complication and yet another procedure. There are multiple risk factors for instability after THR, and increased use of dual mobility cups (DMC) is already documented.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
1000

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with hip arthritis who are amenable to surgery with THR and age ≥ 65 years referred to the Department of Orthopedic Surgery at either Section Farsø, Frederikshavn Hospital or Aalborg University Hospital. Patients who are willing to participate in the trial and who give their written, informed consent after receiving oral and written information.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who do not wish to participate.
  • Sequelae of Calvé-Legg-Perthes' disease, caput necrosis, epiphysiolysis.
  • Proximal femoral or acetabular fracture.
  • Hip dysplasia with subluxation Crowe types III and IV.
  • Earlier hip bone surgery (excluding arthroscopic surgery).
  • Elective bilateral surgery.
  • If the patient's bone morphology is unsuitable for a cemented Exeter® femoral stem.
  • Patients with no e-mail.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Unipolar cup
Patients randomized to receive a conventional unipolar acetabular cup
Device: unipolar cup
The use of a TMT cup
Active Comparator: dual mobility cup
Patients randomized to receive a double mobility acetabular cup
Device: dual mobility cup
The use of a Sunfit dual mobility cup

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Early dislocation, Difference in dislocation within 1 year.
Time Frame: 1 year after surgery
The primary outcome is the difference in cumulative incidence proportion of dislocation between the 2 randomized groups within the first year after total hip replacement. The information will be collected from both the patient through questionnaires and from the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register and the Danish National Patient Register.
1 year after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference in dislocation within 5 years
Time Frame: 5 years after surgery
The difference in cumulative incidence proportion of dislocation between the 2 randomized groups within 5 years after total hip replacement. The information will be collected from both the patient through questionnaires and from the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register and the Danish National Patient Register.
5 years after surgery
Dislocation 10 year
Time Frame: 10 years after surgery
The difference in cumulative incidence proportion of dislocation between the 2 randomized groups within 10 years after total hip replacement. The information will be collected from both the patient through questionnaires and from the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register and the Danish National Patient Register.
10 years after surgery
Prosthesis survival.
Time Frame: 1, 5 and 10 year
Evaluated by the cumulative incidence of THR's reoperated within 1, 5 and 10 years after total hip replacement. The information will be collected from both the patient through questionnaires and from the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register and the Danish National Patient Register.
1, 5 and 10 year
Patient reported outcome measure: European quality of life 5 dimensions (EQ-5D 5L)
Time Frame: 1, 5 and 10 years
Patients will be scored with EQ-5D 5L preoperatively and at 1,5 and 10 years. It consists of 5 dimensions ranging from 1-5, with 1 being the best in each dimension. It also consist of a visual analog scale ranging from 0-100, 100 being the best imaginable health, The EQ VAS describes the respondents current overall health. Data will be showed as changes in health over time showing responses at baseline and at follow up or as frequencies and proportions reported by dimension and level.
1, 5 and 10 years
Patient reported outcome measure: Oxford Hip Score (OHS)
Time Frame: 1, 5 and 10 years
Patients will be scored with OHS at baseline and at 1, 5 and 10 years. OHS is a patient-recorded outcome measure designed to assess the outcome of hip replacements. Its a score between 0-48 with 48 being the best.
1, 5 and 10 years
Patient reported outcome measures: The Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS)
Time Frame: 1, 5 and 10 years
HAGOS pain subscale will be used to report pain pre and postoperatively. The score in the pain subscale ranges from 0 (extreme hip/groin problems) -100 (no hip/groin problems).
1, 5 and 10 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Northern Orthopaedic Division, Denmark

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 1, 2025

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2035

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 15, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 22, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 28, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 27, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 24, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • N-20190040

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dislocation, Hip

Clinical Trials on unipolar cup

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings