Determining Feasibility and Acceptability of Sharing Video Recordings With Patients With ALS and Caregivers

February 17, 2023 updated by: Paul J. Barr, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

Determining the Feasibility, Acceptability, and Potential Effectiveness of Sharing Video Recordings of Multidisciplinary ALS Clinics With Patients and Their Caregivers

Our objective in the proposed project is to: (a) operationalize and determine the feasibility and acceptability of a trial where clinic multi-disciplinary clinic (MDC) visits are audio/video recorded and shared with patients with ALS and their caregivers; (b) gather preliminary data examining the impact of routinely adding audio/video recordings of clinic visits to UC on self-management ability and other behavioral, health and health services outcomes at baseline (T0) and other regular interviews from enrollment (T1= 1 Week, T2= 3 Months); and (c) identify factors pertinent to the acceptability of our study protocol and the audio/video recording of visits.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

We will conduct a single-site, two-arm, parallel group, patient-randomized, controlled, pilot trial with 3-month follow up, to determine the feasibility, acceptability, and potential effectiveness of sharing audio/video recordings of multidisciplinary ALS clinics with patients and their caregivers. We will recruit 24 patients with ALS and their caregivers over a recruitment period of 1 year. We are primarily interested in determining the feasibility of the trial and acceptability of the audio/video intervention. We will also explore the impact on the patients' ability to self-manage their care as well as exploratory outcomes, at baseline (T0 = pre-visit), at T1 (1 week), and at T2 (3 months).

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
79

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • New Hampshire
      • Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States, 03766
        • Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • diagnosed and primarily treated for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)
  • Aged 18 years or greater
  • Can communicate in English (verbally, on a computer, or with assistance)
  • Have email
  • Have internet access
  • Willing to have their multidisciplinary clinic visit audio/video recorded for a 3 month period

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Those without the capacity to provide consent, either themselves or via proxy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: VIDEO
Participants receive access to video recordings of their clinic visits
Other: HealthPAL
Participants who are randomly assigned to the HealthPAL arm will have immediate post- visit access to audio/video-recordings of their clinical visit through a HIPAA-compliant web-based program called HealthPAL.
No Intervention: Usual Care
Participants receive usual care (UC), which is their normal clinic visit and written after-visit summary

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Enrollment (Feasibility)
Time Frame: Study Completion, an average of 1 year
Meeting the targeted recruitment number and rate (two patients per month over a 12 month period)
Study Completion, an average of 1 year
Intervention Fidelity (Feasibility)
Time Frame: Three months
The proportion of ALS MDC (multidisciplinary clinic) patients in the intervention arm that received the VIDEO intervention with full adherence to a pre-defined protocol fidelity checklist. Any deviations will be documented.
Three months
Patient use of the Intervention (Acceptability)
Time Frame: Three months
The proportion of ALS MDC (multidisciplinary clinic) patients in the intervention arm who used the recording between the day of receipt and the three-month follow up
Three months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline in Patient Satisfaction, as measured by the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire-18 (PSQ-18)
Time Frame: Baseline, one week, three months
Scores are measured on an 18-item, 5-level scale, with a score of 1 indicating "strongly agree" and a score of 5 indicating "Strongly Disagree". Scores range from 18 to 90, with lower scores indicating higher levels of satisfaction.
Baseline, one week, three months
Change from baseline in adherence to treatment, as measured by the Medical Outcomes Study - General Adherence
Time Frame: Baseline, one week, three months
Scores are measured on a 5-item, 6-level scale, with a score of 1 indicating "None of the time" and a score of 6 indicating "All of the time". Scores range from 6 to 30, with higher scores indicating higher levels of adherence. Items 1 and 3 are scored in reverse.
Baseline, one week, three months
Change from baseline in adherence to medications, as measured by the Adherence to Refills and Medications Scale - 7 (ARMS-7)
Time Frame: Baseline, one week, three months
Scores are measured on a 7-item, 4-level scale, with a score of 1 indicating "None" and a score of 4 indicating "All". Scores range from 7 to 28, with lower scores indicating higher levels of adherence.
Baseline, one week, three months
Change from baseline in adherence to physical therapy, as measured by the Exercise Adherence Rating Scale (EARS)
Time Frame: Baseline, one week, three months
Scores are measured on a 6-item, 5-level scale, with 0 indicating "Completely agree" and 4 indicating "Completely disagree". Scores range from 0 to 30, where a higher score indicates a higher level of adherence.
Baseline, one week, three months
Change from baseline in anxiety, as measured by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder - 7 (GAD-7)
Time Frame: Baseline, three months
Scores are based on a 7-item, 4-level scale with 0 indicating "Not at all" and 3 indicating "Nearly every day". Higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety.
Baseline, three months
Change from baseline in functional status, as measured by the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS)
Time Frame: Baseline, one week, three months
Scores are measured on a 13-item, 5-level scale, with 0 indicating low function and 4 indicating high functioning, and one item as "yes/no". Scores range from 0 to 48, with high scores indicating higher levels of functioning.
Baseline, one week, three months
Change from baseline in depression, as measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire - 8 (PHQ-8)
Time Frame: Baseline, three months
Scores are based on a 8-item, 4-level scale with 0 indicating "Not at all" and 3 indicating "Nearly every day". Higher scores indicate higher levels of depression.
Baseline, three months
Level of Communication in the Visit, as measured by the Interpersonal Processes of Care (IPC)
Time Frame: One week
Scores are based on an 18-item, 5-level scale with 1 indicating "Never" and 5 indicating "Always". Scores range from 18 to 90, with higher scores indicating higher levels of communication.
One week
Level of literacy, as measured by the Single Item Literacy Screener
Time Frame: Baseline
Scores are measured on a single item, 5-level scale. Scores range from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating higher levels of literacy.
Baseline
Change in caregiver burden, as measured by the Burden Scale for Family Caregivers - Short (BSFC-s)
Time Frame: Baseline, one week, three months
Scores are based on a 10-item, 4-level scale, with 0 indicating strongly disagree and 3 indicating strongly agree. Scores range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicate higher levels of burden.
Baseline, one week, three months
Change in caregiver preparedness, as measured by the Preparedness for Caregiving Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, one week, three months
Scores are based on a 9-item, 5-level scale, with 0 indicating not at all prepared, and 4 indicating very well prepared. Scores range from 0 to 45, with higher scores indicating higher levels of preparedness.
Baseline, one week, three months
Change in self-efficacy, as measured by the Self Efficacy for Managing Chronic Disease scale
Time Frame: Baseline, one week, three months
Scores are measured on 6x 10-item scales. Scores range from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating higher levels of self-efficacy.
Baseline, one week, three months
Feasibility of the Intervention, as measured by the Feasibility of Intervention Metric (FIM)
Time Frame: Three months from baseline
Scores are measured on a 4-item, 5-level scale, with a score of 1 indicating "completely disagree" and 5 indicating "completely agree". Scores range from 4 to 20, with higher scores indicating higher levels of feasibility.
Three months from baseline
Acceptability of the Intervention, as measured by the Acceptability of Intervention Metric (AIM)
Time Frame: Three months from baseline
Scores are measured on a 4-item, 5-level scale, with a score of 1 indicating "completely disagree" and 5 indicating "completely agree". Scores range from 4 to 20, with higher scores indicating higher levels of acceptability.
Three months from baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
The Diamond Endowment Project

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Jeffrey Cohen, MD, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
  • Principal Investigator: Paul J Barr, PhD, Dartmouth College

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 12, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 9, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 9, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 15, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 20, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 22, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 20, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 17, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • STUDY02000798

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings