Study Comparing Osseodensification With Standard Drilling (OD/SD)
Prospective Study Comparing Standard Extraction Drilling With Osseodensification for Dental Implant Placement
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Our postulated null hypotheses is that implants placed with osseodensification surgical drilling compared to those placed with subtractive conventional drilling technique in a split-mouth design will result: 1) in the same insertion torque values and; 2) in the same implant stability quotient values when measured immediately after implant placement and after 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 12 weeks.
Study Objectives:
A.Perform a prospective clinical study to investigate implant primary stability through measuring insertion torque values (IT) and Implant stability quotient (ISQ) when implants are placed using a standard drilling protocol (subtractive surgical drilling, as recommended by implant manufacturers) compared to osseodensification drilling protocol in a split-mouth design.
B.Implant stability quotient will be measured once the implant is placed (immediate), and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 12 weeks.
C.To investigate, and analyze these two surgical drilling protocols as function of different implant manufacturers with variations in diameter and length.
D.To further track trends in the use of osseodensification surgical drilling once the patient receives the prosthodontic reconstruction.
E.To share the knowledge generated from this prospective analysis through scientific publications.
Patient selection will focus on the need of implant placement on the right and left equivalent sides of the maxilla/mandible where one side/site will receive implant(s) placed post osseodensification surgical drilling recommended by Densifying reference guide of the Densah Burs manufacturer, and the other side/site will receive implant(s) placed by the control technique, which is subtractive conventional drilling recommended by the specific implant manufacturer.
Written consent will be provided, explained and signed by participating patients.
After Dental Implant procedure, participating patients will be asked to participate in 6-12 weekly follow visits.
Subjects Selection and Study Procedures:
Study will include 23 patients. Patients should not be in another research study or have not been in any other research study in the last 90 days. They cannot be in this study if they are abusing any drugs.
Patient selection will focus on the need of implant placement on the right and left equivalent sides of the maxilla/ mandible where one side/site will receive implant(s) placed by osseodensification surgical drilling, and the other side/site will receive implant(s) placed by the control surgical technique, which is subtractive conventional drilling recommended by the implant manufacturer.
Written consent will be provided, explained and signed by participating patients.
After Dental Implant procedure, participating patients will be asked to participate in 6-12 weekly follow-up visits.
Subjects Selection and Study Procedures:
Study will include 23 patients. Patients should not be in another research study or have not been in any other research study in the last 90 days. They cannot be in this study if they are abusing any drugs.
Patient selection will focus on the need of implant placement on the right and left equivalent sides of the maxilla/mandible where one side/site will receive implant(s) placed by osseodensification surgical drilling according to the manufacturer Densifying Reference Guide, and the other side/site will receive implant(s) placed by the control surgical technique, which is subtractive conventional drilling recommended by the implant manufacturer.
Written consent will be provided, explained and signed by participating patients.
After Dental Implant procedure, participating patients will be asked to participate in 6-12 weekly follow visits.
Study Procedures:
- The implants will both be placed in the upper or lower jaw. The type of placement preparation of the first implant will be determined by chance (like flipping a coin) with other preparation for the second implant site. Implant primary stability will be measured initially by measuring insertion torque values utilizing a commercially available and validated clinical torque indicator.
- Implant placement procedure will follow the standard of care for both implants for pain management, aftercare and infection control.
- During the weekly follow-up visits over 6-12 weeks, we will conduct a non-invasive measurement of Implant secondary stability utilizing the Osstell device. Osstell is a resonance frequency tester, which will create a gentle vibration in the implant and measure how much if any the implant moves with the vibration. The device will not loosen the implant. The standard of care is after confirming implant healing and high secondary stability is to initiate yearly follow up as needed.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Michigan
-
Jackson, Michigan, United States, 49203
- Salah Huwais, DDS, PLLC
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Study will include 23 patients. Patients should not be in another research study or have not been in any other research study in the last 90 days. They cannot be in this study if they are abusing any drugs.
Patients are older than 22 years, medically Stable Patients should not be in another research study or have not been in any other research study in the last 90 days.
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient needs an implant placements in both maxilla and mandible.
- Patients are medically stable.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Drug Abuse
- Patient should not have been in any other research study in the last 90 days from the study starting date.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Number of groups / cohorts
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / CohortGroup / Cohort |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Osseodensification
Osseodensification is a novel, biomechanical osteotomy preparation technique that preserves bone through a non-excavating drilling process utilizing specially designed burs with a tapered geometry and specially designed flutes progressively expand the osteotomy whilst compacting bone into its walls and apex.
|
Implants placed with osseodensification surgical drilling compared to those placed with subtractive conventional drilling technique in a split-mouth design will result: 1) in the same insertion torque values and; 2) in the same implant stability quotient values when measured immediately after implant placement and after 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 12 weeks.
Other Names:
|
|
Standard Drilling
Utilizing conventional drilling technique with standard bone drilling techniques.
|
Implants placed with osseodensification surgical drilling compared to those placed with subtractive conventional drilling technique in a split-mouth design will result: 1) in the same insertion torque values and; 2) in the same implant stability quotient values when measured immediately after implant placement and after 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 12 weeks.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Implant Primary Stability
Time Frame: Day 0
|
Implant primary stability is a mechanical parameters that reflects implant stability Day of surgery.
Implant primary stability is measured by measuring implant insertion torque (measured during implant insertion with a torque wrench)
|
Day 0
|
|
Implant Secondary Stability
Time Frame: 1-16 weeks
|
During the weekly follow-up visits over 1-12 weeks, we will conduct a non-invasive measurement of implant secondary stability (correlated to BIC) utilizing the Osstell device.
Osstell is a resonance frequency tester, which will create a gentle vibration in the implant and measure how much if any the implant moves with the vibration.
The device will not loosen the implant.
We will measure weekly.
The standard of care is measurement of implant stability at 6-12 weeks post implant placement with yearly follow up as needed.
|
1-16 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Cumulative implant survival rate
Time Frame: 10-16 weeks
|
Implant Osseointegration success rate
|
10-16 weeks
|
|
Bone Instrumentation effect on different implant geometry
Time Frame: 1-16 weeks
|
Study, and analyze these two surgical drilling protocols as function of different implant manufacturers with variations in diameter and length.
|
1-16 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Salah Huwais, DDS, Jackson Implant Surgery
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Study Start
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- JacksonImplantS
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Tooth Loss
-
NCT07337057RecruitingTooth Loss / Rehabilitation
-
NCT00901121CompletedBone Loss | Teeth Loss
-
NCT07613658Not yet recruitingSpace Maintenance | Tooth Loss / Rehabilitation
-
NCT07574099Active, not recruitingTooth Loss / Rehabilitation | Maxilla
-
NCT04350749Completed
-
NCT07278180CompletedTooth Decay | Tooth Loss / Rehabilitation | Caries Active
-
NCT07315607RecruitingPartial Edentulism | Tooth Loss / Rehabilitation
-
NCT05005585Not yet recruitingLoss of Teeth Due to Extraction
-
NCT02482987UnknownLoss of Teeth Due to Extraction
Clinical Trials on Osseodensification Densah Bur
-
NCT02502058Withdrawn
-
NCT05411510Not yet recruitingMaxillary Sinus Disease
-
NCT04189718CompletedBone Density | Implant Stability
-
NCT04481867CompletedDental Implant Failed
-
NCT07378020Completed
-
NCT07160309CompletedAlveolar Bone Loss
-
NCT07586475Not yet recruitingPatient With Low Denisty Bone