- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04779203
Study Comparing Osseodensification With Standard Drilling (OD/SD)
Prospective Study Comparing Standard Extraction Drilling With Osseodensification for Dental Implant Placement
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Our postulated null hypotheses is that implants placed with osseodensification surgical drilling compared to those placed with subtractive conventional drilling technique in a split-mouth design will result: 1) in the same insertion torque values and; 2) in the same implant stability quotient values when measured immediately after implant placement and after 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 12 weeks.
Study Objectives:
A.Perform a prospective clinical study to investigate implant primary stability through measuring insertion torque values (IT) and Implant stability quotient (ISQ) when implants are placed using a standard drilling protocol (subtractive surgical drilling, as recommended by implant manufacturers) compared to osseodensification drilling protocol in a split-mouth design.
B.Implant stability quotient will be measured once the implant is placed (immediate), and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 12 weeks.
C.To investigate, and analyze these two surgical drilling protocols as function of different implant manufacturers with variations in diameter and length.
D.To further track trends in the use of osseodensification surgical drilling once the patient receives the prosthodontic reconstruction.
E.To share the knowledge generated from this prospective analysis through scientific publications.
Patient selection will focus on the need of implant placement on the right and left equivalent sides of the maxilla/mandible where one side/site will receive implant(s) placed post osseodensification surgical drilling recommended by Densifying reference guide of the Densah Burs manufacturer, and the other side/site will receive implant(s) placed by the control technique, which is subtractive conventional drilling recommended by the specific implant manufacturer.
Written consent will be provided, explained and signed by participating patients.
After Dental Implant procedure, participating patients will be asked to participate in 6-12 weekly follow visits.
Subjects Selection and Study Procedures:
Study will include 23 patients. Patients should not be in another research study or have not been in any other research study in the last 90 days. They cannot be in this study if they are abusing any drugs.
Patient selection will focus on the need of implant placement on the right and left equivalent sides of the maxilla/ mandible where one side/site will receive implant(s) placed by osseodensification surgical drilling, and the other side/site will receive implant(s) placed by the control surgical technique, which is subtractive conventional drilling recommended by the implant manufacturer.
Written consent will be provided, explained and signed by participating patients.
After Dental Implant procedure, participating patients will be asked to participate in 6-12 weekly follow-up visits.
Subjects Selection and Study Procedures:
Study will include 23 patients. Patients should not be in another research study or have not been in any other research study in the last 90 days. They cannot be in this study if they are abusing any drugs.
Patient selection will focus on the need of implant placement on the right and left equivalent sides of the maxilla/mandible where one side/site will receive implant(s) placed by osseodensification surgical drilling according to the manufacturer Densifying Reference Guide, and the other side/site will receive implant(s) placed by the control surgical technique, which is subtractive conventional drilling recommended by the implant manufacturer.
Written consent will be provided, explained and signed by participating patients.
After Dental Implant procedure, participating patients will be asked to participate in 6-12 weekly follow visits.
Study Procedures:
- The implants will both be placed in the upper or lower jaw. The type of placement preparation of the first implant will be determined by chance (like flipping a coin) with other preparation for the second implant site. Implant primary stability will be measured initially by measuring insertion torque values utilizing a commercially available and validated clinical torque indicator.
- Implant placement procedure will follow the standard of care for both implants for pain management, aftercare and infection control.
- During the weekly follow-up visits over 6-12 weeks, we will conduct a non-invasive measurement of Implant secondary stability utilizing the Osstell device. Osstell is a resonance frequency tester, which will create a gentle vibration in the implant and measure how much if any the implant moves with the vibration. The device will not loosen the implant. The standard of care is after confirming implant healing and high secondary stability is to initiate yearly follow up as needed.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Michigan
-
Jackson, Michigan, United States, 49203
- Salah Huwais, DDS, PLLC
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Study will include 23 patients. Patients should not be in another research study or have not been in any other research study in the last 90 days. They cannot be in this study if they are abusing any drugs.
Patients are older than 22 years, medically Stable Patients should not be in another research study or have not been in any other research study in the last 90 days.
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient needs an implant placements in both maxilla and mandible.
- Patients are medically stable.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Drug Abuse
- Patient should not have been in any other research study in the last 90 days from the study starting date.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Osseodensification
Osseodensification is a novel, biomechanical osteotomy preparation technique that preserves bone through a non-excavating drilling process utilizing specially designed burs with a tapered geometry and specially designed flutes progressively expand the osteotomy whilst compacting bone into its walls and apex.
|
Implants placed with osseodensification surgical drilling compared to those placed with subtractive conventional drilling technique in a split-mouth design will result: 1) in the same insertion torque values and; 2) in the same implant stability quotient values when measured immediately after implant placement and after 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 12 weeks.
Other Names:
|
Standard Drilling
Utilizing conventional drilling technique with standard bone drilling techniques.
|
Implants placed with osseodensification surgical drilling compared to those placed with subtractive conventional drilling technique in a split-mouth design will result: 1) in the same insertion torque values and; 2) in the same implant stability quotient values when measured immediately after implant placement and after 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 12 weeks.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Implant Primary Stability
Time Frame: Day 0
|
Implant primary stability is a mechanical parameters that reflects implant stability Day of surgery.
Implant primary stability is measured by measuring implant insertion torque (measured during implant insertion with a torque wrench)
|
Day 0
|
Implant Secondary Stability
Time Frame: 1-16 weeks
|
During the weekly follow-up visits over 1-12 weeks, we will conduct a non-invasive measurement of implant secondary stability (correlated to BIC) utilizing the Osstell device.
Osstell is a resonance frequency tester, which will create a gentle vibration in the implant and measure how much if any the implant moves with the vibration.
The device will not loosen the implant.
We will measure weekly.
The standard of care is measurement of implant stability at 6-12 weeks post implant placement with yearly follow up as needed.
|
1-16 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Cumulative implant survival rate
Time Frame: 10-16 weeks
|
Implant Osseointegration success rate
|
10-16 weeks
|
Bone Instrumentation effect on different implant geometry
Time Frame: 1-16 weeks
|
Study, and analyze these two surgical drilling protocols as function of different implant manufacturers with variations in diameter and length.
|
1-16 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Salah Huwais, DDS, Jackson Implant Surgery
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- JacksonImplantS
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Tooth Loss
-
Institut Straumann AGCompleted
-
University of AarhusCompleted
-
Duygu KarasanHacettepe UniversityCompleted
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisUnknown
-
Cairo UniversityNot yet recruitingLoss of Teeth Due to ExtractionEgypt
-
Eisenhower Army Medical CenterUnknownLoss of Teeth Due to ExtractionUnited States
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center at...Osteogenics BiomedicalCompletedLoss of Teeth Due to Extraction
-
Institut Straumann AGTerminated
-
Heidelberg UniversityCompletedTooth Loss, Teeth Replaced Using All Ceramic FPDsGermany
-
Ege UniversityCompleted
Clinical Trials on Osseodensification Densah Bur
-
University of MinnesotaWithdrawnMissing TeethUnited States
-
Ahmed Mohamed Said RozeikNot yet recruitingMaxillary Sinus DiseaseEgypt
-
Cairo UniversityCompletedDental Implant FailedEgypt
-
University of BaghdadCompleted
-
Krishnadevaraya College of Dental Sciences & HospitalCompletedBone Density | Implant StabilityIndia
-
Esraa Salem KamalRecruiting
-
Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and...Active, not recruitingDental Implant Failed | Edentulous Alveolar Ridge | Jaw, Edentulous, Partially | Osseointegration Failure of Dental ImplantUnited Arab Emirates
-
University of BaghdadCompletedDental Implant Failed | Bone Infection | Bone FractureIraq
-
Cairo UniversityUnknown
-
King Khalid UniversityNot yet recruitingEvaluation of Osseointegration and Stability of Dental Implants in Bone Density Enhanced by Osseodensification Technique