Mpact 3D Metal Cup PMS

April 30, 2024 updated by: Medacta International SA

A Multicentric, Prospective Clinical Survey on Long Term Performance of an Acetabular Component in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

Cementless fixation, with or without screw augmentation, has evolved during the past few decades as the preferred method for acetabular reconstruction. Although major improvements have been recorded with regard to clinical outcomes and survivorship, acetabular component loosening remains among the most common causes of failure and revision. Patient age, poor bone quality and conditions, such as osteonecrosis and dysplasia, have been observed to influence negatively long-term clinical results.

Initial stability is fundamental for survivorship of cementless cups. Prerequisites to achieve durable cementless cup fixation are close contact with viable native bone, primary mechanical stability and secondary bone integration. Press-fit techniques provide optimal conditions for bone ingrowth and fixation but research focused on cup material in order to improve primary stability. Pore size, bone-implant apposition, and material properties all influence bone ingrowth and long-term stability.

Biological ingrowth surfaces have become a standard prosthetic element in reconstructive hip surgery. A material's properties, three-dimensional architecture, and surface texture all play integral parts in its biological performance. Trabecular metal is an important new biomaterial that has been introduced to enhance the potential of biological ingrowth as well as provide a structural scaffold in cases of severe bone deficit. The continuity between the porous and solid parts has been specifically developed to overcome the limitations of the traditional porous coatings. In fact, the absence of an interface between the trabecular structure and the bulk material provides greater structural solidity and thus higher resistance to detachment and corrosion. Initial clinical applications have focused on bone restoration in tumor and salvage cases and in primary and revision reconstructive cases where the increased biological fixation would be of clinical benefit. However the bone ingrowth potential and mechanical integrity of this material offer exciting options for orthopedic reconstructive surgeons such as difficult THA cases, such as patients with high demands, subjects affected by severe hip conditions (i.e. osteonecrosis, dysplasia) or with extremely poor bone quality. Medacta Mpact 3D Metal cup, is an acetabular cup realized using the EBM (Electron Beam Melting) powder technology; this production method offers a high friction and scratch-fit feel for the initial stability, without the need of any additional coating. Moreover the 3D Metal structure creates a favorable environment for bone thus providing secondary fixation.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the long term clinical and radiological performance of MPact 3D Metal acetabular component.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
500

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Italy
    • MI
      • Milan, MI, Italy, 20161
        • Recruiting
        • IRRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

No sample size calculation has been performed; the number of patients has been defined according to the ODEP panel directive (Orthopaedic Data Evaluation Panel), for a long term post-marketing observational study. The number of patients is in line with long term observational study and considered sufficient to evaluate 10 years survival rate of the cup.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Those suffering from hip primary arthrosis, post-traumatic arthrosis, hip dysplasia or avascular necrosis of femoral head, rheumatic arthrosis
  • Those aged between 18 and 75 years old at the surgery time
  • those suitable to undergo to a primary total hip arthroplasty for whom the Mpact 3D Metal cup will be implanted (according to the label indication/contraindications)
  • Patients who are willing and able to provide written informed consent for participation in the study. Written informed consent must be obtained prior to patient's surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Those with acute or chronic infection
  • Those whose mental conditions may compromise their ability to provide informed consent to study participation, ability to complete questionnaires or complete 10-year follow-ups.
  • Those suffered by severe deformation, at the discretion of surgeon
  • Those suffered by osteoporosis
  • Those with metabolic disorders that may involve bone metabolism for which cementless implants are contraindicated
  • Those suffered by muscular atrophy or neuromuscular disease
  • Those allergic to medical device material previewed for the surgery
  • Those unable to give their consent to participate in the study or who do not want to participate
  • Those whose functional recovery is compromised by

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Mpact 3d metal
Subjects, among those whose clinical condition makes them eligible for a primary total hip arthroplasty, will be invited to participate to the study during preoperative visit. The
Device: Mpact 3D metal cup
Subjects, among those whose clinical condition makes them eligible for a primary total hip arthroplasty, will be invited to participate to the study during preoperative visit. They'll receive the Mpact 3D metal cup device

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
long term performance
Time Frame: 10 years
Device survival will be assessed by Kaplan Meier curve
10 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical performance
Time Frame: 3 months, 1, 5, 7 and 10 years after surgery
Harris Hip Score collected during preoperative and follow-up visits. Harris Hip score scale correspond to 0-100 points. Results can be interpreted with the following: <70 = poor result; 70-80 = fair, 80-90 = good, and 90-100 = excellent.
3 months, 1, 5, 7 and 10 years after surgery
Radiological performance
Time Frame: 3 months, 1, 5, 7 and 10 years after surgery
standard x-ray exam performed preoperatively and postoperatively before discharge from hospital and during follow-up visits
3 months, 1, 5, 7 and 10 years after surgery
Hip physical function after surgery
Time Frame: 3 months and 1, 5, 7 and 10 years after surgery
HOOS-PS score collected during preoperative visit and follow-up visit. HOOS PS scale correspond to 100 (no difficulty) to 0 (extreme difficulty) scale.
3 months and 1, 5, 7 and 10 years after surgery
Rate of complications
Time Frame: up to 10 years after surgery
collection of adverse events
up to 10 years after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Medacta International SA

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 7, 2019

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 7, 2032

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 7, 2032

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 16, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 16, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 17, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 1, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 30, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • P01.023.01

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Total Hip Arthroplasty

Clinical Trials on Mpact 3D metal cup

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings