Prophylaxis Vaccine Antibodies Ebola (PROVAE)

October 14, 2021 updated by: ANRS, Emerging Infectious Diseases

Phase IIa Pilot Study Evaluating the Efficacy of a Monoclonal Antibody and Vaccine-based Post-exposure Prophylaxis Strategy in High-risk Contact Cases of Ebola Virus Disease Infection

  • Three measures are currently being implemented to control Ebola outbreaks:

    • Monitoring of contacts
    • Isolation and treatment of sick people
    • Vaccination of the population in high-risk areas.
  • In contacts with high viral exposure and therefore a high risk of incubation and rapid expression of infection, the r-VSV-ZEBOV vaccine does not provide adequate protection because vaccine antibody production is effective 6 to 10 days after administration.
  • Specific monoclonal antibodies (Mab) from the Regeneron and mAb114 research specialties have been shown to be effective in reducing mortality in patients with Ebola virus disease (EVD).
  • Their use in a single parenteral administration and good tolerability make them candidates for use in post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) in individuals at high risk of viral exposure.
  • A comprehensive strategy for the protection of high-risk contacts must therefore be implemented, including the vaccine and the Mabs, to ensure both immediate and prolonged protection. Indeed, the efficacy of the vaccine is likely to be diminished when co-administered with Mabs, as both strategies share the same viral target (the GP envelope glycoprotein) and the vaccine is replicative (and therefore may be inhibited by Mabs).

PROVAE aim to evaluate the effectiveness of a comprehensive strategy to prevent transmission of MVE in contacts at high risk of infection, including (i) post-exposure prophylaxis with Mabs and (ii) vaccination with r-VSV-ZEBOV.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
250

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Guinea
      • N'Zerekore, Guinea
        • Centre de Traitement Ebola de N'Zerekore
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

The inclusion criteria for the efficacy trial are:

  • Have had, within the previous 72 hours, a high-risk contact with an Ebola patient confirmed by RT-PCR;
  • Be 18 years of age or older at the time of inclusion;
  • Have no symptoms of EVD;
  • Give consent to participate in the efficacy trial;
  • Agree not to participate in any other therapeutic or vaccine study until the end of the trial follow-up.

The criteria for non-inclusion in the efficacy trial are:

  • Have a history of EVD (self-report);
  • Have been vaccinated with ERVEBO prior to the start of the study;
  • Have participated in another therapeutic or vaccine study within 15 days prior to inclusion.

Inclusion criteria for the immunology ancillary study are:

High Risk Arm:

  • Be included in the efficacy trial;
  • Be available for extended follow-up as specified in the protocol;
  • Specifically consent to the immunology ancillary study.

Control arm:

  • Be 18 years of age or older at the time of inclusion;
  • Have no symptoms of EVD;
  • Eligible for ERVEBO vaccination according to national program criteria;
  • Be available for extended follow-up as specified in the protocol;
  • Consent specifically for the ancillary immunology study.

The criteria for non-inclusion in the immunologic ancillary study are:

  • All efficacy trial non-inclusion criteria;
  • HIV positive;
  • Pregnant women.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
  • Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: High risk arm
Mabs at day 0 and vaccine at week 6
Drug: ansuvimab
Human monoclonal antibody to Zaire strain GP (EBOV GP)
Other Names:
  • mab114
Biological: Ervebo
Ebola Zaire vaccine (rVSV∆G-ZEBOV-GP, live, attenuated) ≥ 72 million PFU, composed of the Indiana strain of recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus (rVSV) with a deletion of the envelope glycoprotein (G) of VSV replaced by the surface glycoprotein (GP) of the Kikwit 1995 strain of Ebola virus Zaire (ZEBOV)
Other Names:
  • VSV-ZEBOV
EXPERIMENTAL: High risk arm (Immunological ancillary study)
Mabs at day 0 and vaccine at week 6
Drug: ansuvimab
Human monoclonal antibody to Zaire strain GP (EBOV GP)
Other Names:
  • mab114
Biological: Ervebo
Ebola Zaire vaccine (rVSV∆G-ZEBOV-GP, live, attenuated) ≥ 72 million PFU, composed of the Indiana strain of recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus (rVSV) with a deletion of the envelope glycoprotein (G) of VSV replaced by the surface glycoprotein (GP) of the Kikwit 1995 strain of Ebola virus Zaire (ZEBOV)
Other Names:
  • VSV-ZEBOV
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Control arm (Immunological ancillary study)
Vaccine at day 0 for contacts eligible for vaccination
Biological: Ervebo
Ebola Zaire vaccine (rVSV∆G-ZEBOV-GP, live, attenuated) ≥ 72 million PFU, composed of the Indiana strain of recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus (rVSV) with a deletion of the envelope glycoprotein (G) of VSV replaced by the surface glycoprotein (GP) of the Kikwit 1995 strain of Ebola virus Zaire (ZEBOV)
Other Names:
  • VSV-ZEBOV

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Efficacy
Time Frame: Week 3
Proportion of participants with negative RT-PCR
Week 3
Immunological ancillary study
Time Frame: 6 months after vaccination
Anti-GP IgG level (FANG reference technique)
6 months after vaccination

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Tolerance
Time Frame: Day 7 post-PEP and day 7 post-vaccination
Estimating adverse effects
Day 7 post-PEP and day 7 post-vaccination
Lost of follow-up
Time Frame: Week 6
Lost of follow-up rate
Week 6
Humoral immune response
Time Frame: 1 and 3 months after vaccination
Anti-GP IgG level (FANG reference technique)
1 and 3 months after vaccination
Neutralizing antibodies
Time Frame: 1, 3 and 6 months after vaccination
Neutralizing antibodies level
1, 3 and 6 months after vaccination

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
ANRS, Emerging Infectious Diseases

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 17, 2021

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 1, 2022

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 26, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 26, 2021

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 30, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 15, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 14, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • ANRS 0006S

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ebola Virus Disease

Clinical Trials on ansuvimab

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings