Assessment of Effectiveness and Safety of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) Combined With Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in Dementia Treatment in Alzheimer's Disease

May 25, 2021 updated by: Jakub Kazmierski, Medical University of Lodz

Alzheimer's disease is the most common disease responsible for dementia, accounting for 40-70% of all dementia cases. Alzheimer's disease is characterized by a gradual and slow decline in memory and other cognitive functions and activities.

The medications currently used in Alzheimer's disease were introduced in the 1990s and exhibit insufficient effectiveness. Despite their use, the disease rapidly progresses, leading to complete loss of independence and death. There are conducted numerous studies on new molecules, however none of them has been successfully accomplished so far. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is one of the youngest electrophysiological methods, enabling non-invasive and painless stimulation of the central and peripheral nervous system. Another non-invasible neurophysiological method that is utilized in treating patients with neurological dysfunctions and mental disorders is Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Clinical trials conducted with isolated usage of rTMS and tDCS showed a positive effect of these methods on the enhancement of cognitive functions in patients with Alzheimer's disease.

The aim of the project is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the combination of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Resonance (rTMS) with Transcranial direct current stimulation in the treatment of Alzheimer's dementia. The primary goal of the project is to assess whether the use of combined tDCS and rTMS therapies in patients diagnosed with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease improves patients' cognitive functions, including memory, attention, thinking, executive and language functions. The research hypothesis assumes that the combination of rTMS and tDCS therapy is an effective method of Alzheimer's disease therapy that can improve cognitive functions and functioning of patients, both in the short and long term.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
40

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Poland
      • Lodz, Poland, 92-213
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Old Age Psychiatry and Psychotic Disorders Medical University of Lodz
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

55 years to 90 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with mild to moderate dementia in Alzheimer's disease, diagnosed using DSM-5 criteria.
  • MMSE score from 12 to 26 points
  • ADAS-Cog over 17 points
  • Voluntary consent to participate in the study
  • there is a related person or legal guardian who consented to assist the patient in the course of the study
  • Minimum 8 years of education.
  • It is allowed to use cholinesterase inhibitors and / or memantine for at least 3 months prior to study entry and at a stable dose for at least 60 days prior to study entry.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe agitation
  • Intellectual Disability
  • Informed consent is not possible
  • Unstable somatic condition
  • Use of benzodiazepines or barbiturates 2 weeks prior to screening
  • Participation in a clinical trial with coinciding factors within 6 months prior to the start of the trial
  • Seizures
  • Contraindications to rTMS treatment according to the rTMS questionnaire attached to the protocol
  • Contraindications to tDCS treatment according to the tDCS questionnaire attached to the protocol
  • Patients with depression, bipolar, or psychotic disorders, or any other neurological or psychiatric condition (current or past) that the Investigator considers to be interfering with the study
  • Alcoholism or drug addiction as defined by DSM-5 in the last 5 years (addicted for more than a year and or in remission for less than 3 years)
  • Patients with any medical condition that the Investigator considers to be an exclusion criterion from the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: TRIPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: rTMS stimulation
20 sessions of stimulation with increasing intensity, reaching maximum in the 4th session.
Device: Magnetic Stimulator DuoMag
Stimulation of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: tDCS stimulation
The stimulation time will be 20 minutes, the current intensity will be 2mA.
Device: neuroConn DC-STIMULATOR
One electrode (anode) will be placed on the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, the other (cathode) on the right temporal lobe.
SHAM_COMPARATOR: Sham rTMS stimulation
20 sessions of stimulation, but without current.
Device: Magnetic Stimulator DuoMag
Stimulation of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex
SHAM_COMPARATOR: Sham tDCS stimulation
The stimulation time will be 20 minutes, but without current.
Device: neuroConn DC-STIMULATOR
One electrode (anode) will be placed on the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, the other (cathode) on the right temporal lobe.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
MMSE Scale
Time Frame: up to 12 weeks
Assessment conducted on baseline, up to 1 week after end of the procedure and after 12 weeks.
up to 12 weeks
ADAS-Cog Scale
Time Frame: up to 12 weeks
Assessment conducted on baseline, up to 1 week after end of the procedure and after 12 weeks.
up to 12 weeks
NPI Scale
Time Frame: up to 12 weeks
Assessment conducted on baseline, up to 1 week after end of the procedure and after 12 weeks.
up to 12 weeks
ADCS
Time Frame: up to 12 weeks
Assessment conducted on baseline, up to 1 week after end of the procedure and after 12 weeks.
up to 12 weeks
GDS
Time Frame: up to 12 weeks
Assessment conducted on baseline, up to 1 week after end of the procedure and after 12 weeks.
up to 12 weeks
Zarit Burden Interview
Time Frame: up to 12 weeks
Assessment conducted on baseline, up to 1 week after end of the procedure and after 12 weeks.
up to 12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Medical University of Lodz

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Jakub Kazmierski, PhD, Medical University of Lodz, Poland

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 2021

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 30, 2023

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 26, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 26, 2021

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 1, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 27, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 25, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • RNN/246/20/KE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Alzheimer Disease

Clinical Trials on Magnetic Stimulator DuoMag

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings