Short-Term Effectiveness of Ultrasound-Guided Corticosteroid Hydrodissection

April 13, 2021 updated by: Yasin Demir, Gaziler Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Education and Research Hospital

Short-Term Effectiveness of Ultrasound-Guided Corticosteroid Hydrodissection in Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Aim: Steroid injections are remarkably effective as a treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) in the short term. The aim of this study was to determine whether hydrodissection would provide an additional clinical effect when used along with a corticosteroid in the short term.

Methods: A prospective cohort of patients with CTS were retrospectively evaluated. 28 patients were selected randomly who received ultrasound (US)-guided triamcinolone hydrodissection (3 mL) as intervention group and received US-guided triamcinolone injection (1 mL) as control group, from the data (case-control ratio 1:1). Outcome measures were the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ), hand grip strength (HGS), fhe cross-sectional area (CSA) of the median nerve and Short Form 12 (SF-12). Assessments were recorded at baseline, 1 and 4 weeks after injection.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Background: Steroid injections are remarkably effective as a treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) in the short term.

Aim: To determine whether hydrodissection would provide an additional clinical effect when used along with a corticosteroid in the short term.

Methods: A prospective cohort of patients with CTS were retrospectively evaluated. 28 patients were selected randomly who received ultrasound (US)-guided triamcinolone hydrodissection (3 mL) as intervention group and received US-guided triamcinolone injection (1 mL) as control group, from the data (case-control ratio 1:1). Outcome measures were the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ), hand grip strength (HGS), fhe cross-sectional area (CSA) of the median nerve and Short Form 12 (SF-12). Assessments were recorded at baseline, 1 and 4 weeks after injection.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
28

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Turkey
    • Cankaya
      • Ankara, Cankaya, Turkey, 06100
        • Merve Orucu Atar

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. aged between 18-65
  2. clinically diagnosed with CTS
  3. electrophysiologically confirmed mild-to-moderate CTS
  4. having typical CTS symptoms for at least 3 months
  5. not benefiting from splinting and resting.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. electrophysiologically diagnosed with severe CTS
  2. surgery history for CTS
  3. presence of metabolic, endocrine and neoplastic disorders
  4. presence of other neurological disorders (such as plexopathy, cervical radiculopathy, proximal median or ulnar neuropathy, polyneuropathy and mononeuritis multiplex)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: SEQUENTIAL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Intervention group
14 patients (14 hands) who received US-guided corticosteroid hydrodissection
Other: Corticosteroid Hydrodissection
The median nerve was examined by US at the scaphoid-pisiform level of the inlet of carpal tunnel. The hydrodissection was achieved by a total volume of 3 mL (1 mL of triamcinolone and 2 mL of saline) in the intervention group based on a study identifying median nerve hydrodissection with this volume. Half of the total volume (1.5 mL ) was delivered via the in-plane ulnar approach and the other half (1.5 mL) via the in-plane median approach to create a fluid plane along the nerve.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Control group
14 patients (14 hands) who received US-guided corticosteroid injection
Other: Corticosteroid Injection
1 mL of triamcinolone was delivered via the in-plane ulnar approach

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire (BCTQ)
Time Frame: baseline, change from baseline BCTQ at 1 and 4 weeks after injection
The Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ) consisting of two subscales (Symptom Severity Scale (SSS) and Functional Status Scale (FSS)) was filled out by the patient him/herself. Both subscales of BCTQ are scored between 1 and 5, and higher scores illustrate a greater degree of disability. The Turkish validity of the questionnaire was demonstrated.
baseline, change from baseline BCTQ at 1 and 4 weeks after injection
Hand grip strength (HGS)
Time Frame: baseline, change from baseline HGS at 1 and 4 weeks after injection
The Standard Jamar Dynamometer was used to measure HGS. The patients were placed in a sitting position with the forearm in a neutral position and the elbow in 90 ° flexion. Three consecutive measurements were performed and the average value of the measurements were noted. Studies have shown that the Jamar dynamometer has high validity and reliability and is considered to be the gold standard for evaluating HGS
baseline, change from baseline HGS at 1 and 4 weeks after injection
Cross-Sectional Area of the Median Nerve
Time Frame: baseline, change from baseline CSA at 1 and 4 weeks after injection
The cross-sectional area (CSA) of the median nerve was measured at the scaphoid-pisiform level by using US since the swelling of the median nerve is a reliable measure for post-injection follow-up at this level (Figure 3). Three measurements were done and averaged for analysis.
baseline, change from baseline CSA at 1 and 4 weeks after injection

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Short Form 12 (SF-12)
Time Frame: baseline, change from baseline SF-12 at 1 and 4 weeks after injection
Quality of life was assessed with the Turkish version of Short Form 12 (SF-12). A physical component score and a mental component score are obtained from the SF-12. Higher scores show better outcomes.
baseline, change from baseline SF-12 at 1 and 4 weeks after injection

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Gaziler Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Education and Research Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Merve Orucu Atar, Gaziler Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Training and Research Hospital, Department of PMR

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 1, 2018

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 30, 2020

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 9, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 13, 2021

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 19, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 19, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 13, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 15 (Tishreen_University)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings