Focused Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (ESWT) Versus Traditional Physiotherapy in the Treatment of Trigger Finger
Focused Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (ESWT) Versus Traditional Physiotherapy in the Treatment of Trigger Finger: a Randomized Controlled Study
Trigger finger is the common name of stenosing tenosynovitis of fingers, caused by repetitive trauma. Conservative treatment includes NSAIDs or other analgesic agents, activity modification, splint, and physiotherapy. Operation could be considered if conservative treatments fails. With literature reviewed, there is no treatment which is both non-invasive and effective, and also could avoid recurrence well.
Extracorporeal shock wave therapy could induce angiogenesis, anti-inflammatory reaction, and recruitment of fibroblast. Although extracorporeal shock wave has been utilized in musculoskeletal diseases for more than twenty years, there is no well-designed clinical trial to prove the effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave in treating trigger finger. The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave therapy with traditional physical therapy for the management of trigger finger.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Quinnel classification grade 2 or 3
- who has only one trigger
Exclusion Criteria:
- who had ever treated the trigger finger
- who has other musculoskeletal disease of the upper limb
- who has severe coagulopathy disease
- who is pregnant
- who has arrhythmia or has a pacemaker
- there is sensory impairment, scar, edema at the trigger finger
- who has cognitive dysfunction
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Focused Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (ESWT)
2000 impulses of 5 Hz and 0.32 mJ/mm2 , twice per week for 3 weeks
|
2000 impulses of 5 Hz and 0.32 mJ/mm2 , twice per week for 3 weeks
|
|
Active Comparator: Physiotherapy
therapeutic ultrasound, 12 times in 3 weeks
|
therapeutic ultrasound, 12 times in 3 weeks
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Quinnell stages of triggering
Time Frame: 15 weeks
|
Quinnell stages of triggering classifies the trigger finger using five types during flexion and extension: normal movement (Type 0), uneven movement (Type I), actively correctable (Type II), passively correctable (Type III) and fixed deformity (Type IV).
|
15 weeks
|
|
11-point numeric scale of pain
Time Frame: 15 weeks
|
The 11-point numeric scale of pain requires the patient to rate their pain on a defined scale.
0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable.
|
15 weeks
|
|
Chinese quick DASH (disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire)
Time Frame: 15 weeks
|
This questionnaire is a self-administered region-specific outcome instrument developed as a measure of self-rated upper-extremity disability and symptoms.
The investigators chose the first two components: the disability and symptom section (11 items, scored 1-5).
The lower score means better condition of upper limbs, and vice versa.
|
15 weeks
|
|
strength of hand grip
Time Frame: 15 weeks
|
The strength of hand grip is to measure the maximum isometric strength of the hand and forearm muscles by a electicial grip strength device.
|
15 weeks
|
|
sonographic image
Time Frame: 15 weeks
|
The investigators would record the characteristics of acquired sonographic images, such like the thickness of finger flexor tendon and A1 pulley, the presence of tendon sheath effusion, and the presence of increased vascularity by Doppler images.
|
15 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Anticipated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- (811)109A-50
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.