Focused Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (ESWT) Versus Traditional Physiotherapy in the Treatment of Trigger Finger

July 21, 2022 updated by: Cheng-Hsin General Hospital

Focused Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (ESWT) Versus Traditional Physiotherapy in the Treatment of Trigger Finger: a Randomized Controlled Study

Trigger finger is the common name of stenosing tenosynovitis of fingers, caused by repetitive trauma. Conservative treatment includes NSAIDs or other analgesic agents, activity modification, splint, and physiotherapy. Operation could be considered if conservative treatments fails. With literature reviewed, there is no treatment which is both non-invasive and effective, and also could avoid recurrence well.

Extracorporeal shock wave therapy could induce angiogenesis, anti-inflammatory reaction, and recruitment of fibroblast. Although extracorporeal shock wave has been utilized in musculoskeletal diseases for more than twenty years, there is no well-designed clinical trial to prove the effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave in treating trigger finger. The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave therapy with traditional physical therapy for the management of trigger finger.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Quinnel classification grade 2 or 3
  • who has only one trigger

Exclusion Criteria:

  • who had ever treated the trigger finger
  • who has other musculoskeletal disease of the upper limb
  • who has severe coagulopathy disease
  • who is pregnant
  • who has arrhythmia or has a pacemaker
  • there is sensory impairment, scar, edema at the trigger finger
  • who has cognitive dysfunction

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Focused Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (ESWT)
2000 impulses of 5 Hz and 0.32 mJ/mm2 , twice per week for 3 weeks
2000 impulses of 5 Hz and 0.32 mJ/mm2 , twice per week for 3 weeks
Active Comparator: Physiotherapy
therapeutic ultrasound, 12 times in 3 weeks
therapeutic ultrasound, 12 times in 3 weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quinnell stages of triggering
Time Frame: 15 weeks
Quinnell stages of triggering classifies the trigger finger using five types during flexion and extension: normal movement (Type 0), uneven movement (Type I), actively correctable (Type II), passively correctable (Type III) and fixed deformity (Type IV).
15 weeks
11-point numeric scale of pain
Time Frame: 15 weeks
The 11-point numeric scale of pain requires the patient to rate their pain on a defined scale. 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable.
15 weeks
Chinese quick DASH (disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire)
Time Frame: 15 weeks
This questionnaire is a self-administered region-specific outcome instrument developed as a measure of self-rated upper-extremity disability and symptoms. The investigators chose the first two components: the disability and symptom section (11 items, scored 1-5). The lower score means better condition of upper limbs, and vice versa.
15 weeks
strength of hand grip
Time Frame: 15 weeks
The strength of hand grip is to measure the maximum isometric strength of the hand and forearm muscles by a electicial grip strength device.
15 weeks
sonographic image
Time Frame: 15 weeks
The investigators would record the characteristics of acquired sonographic images, such like the thickness of finger flexor tendon and A1 pulley, the presence of tendon sheath effusion, and the presence of increased vascularity by Doppler images.
15 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

May 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

August 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 10, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 20, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

April 22, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 25, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 21, 2022

Last Verified

July 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Trigger Finger

Clinical Trials on Focused Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (ESWT)

3
Subscribe