Patient Reported Symptom Control With THC or CBD Use

March 3, 2026 updated by: M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
This study compares patients' attitudes regarding marijuana products for medical use and other treatments for cancer-related pain. This study may help researchers gain better understanding of patient's perception on their use of marijuana products in treating cancer-related pain and other common cancer-related symptoms.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:

I. To determine the patient's reported preference for cancer pain improvement with opioids, opioids with delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)-marijuana and/or opioids with cannabidiol (CBD).

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To determine the association between perception of cancer-related symptom relief and use of THC-marijuana and/or CBD.

II. To compare patient perception of THC-marijuana and/or CBD versus (vs.) cancer treatments in treatment of cancer.

III. To evaluate patient report of adverse effects experienced while using THC-marijuana and/or CBD.

IV. To evaluate patient reported concerns while using THC-marijuana and/or CBD. V. To evaluate patient attitude of dosing, forms and use of THC-marijuana and/or CBD.

VI. To evaluate demographic, physical and psychosocial factors that influence patient perception and attitudes of THC-marijuana and/or CBD.

VII. To explore the difference of patient perception of THC-marijuana and CBD in cancer centers in a legalized vs. a non-legalized state.

VIII. To explore the patient reported preference of THC-marijuana and CBD for cancer pain and symptom relief of patients in a Supportive Care Center vs. Integrative Medicine Center at University of Texas (U.T.) MD Anderson.

OUTLINE:

Patients' medical records are reviewed and then complete questionnaires over 27 minutes.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
200

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Arizona
      • Gilbert, Arizona, United States, 85234
        • Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • M D Anderson Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients (inpatient or outpatient) seen by the Palliative Care and Integrative Medicine teams at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (Texas) and the Palliative Care team at Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center (Arizona)

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients (inpatient or outpatient) seen by the Palliative Care and Integrative Medicine teams at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (Texas) and the Palliative Care team at Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center (Arizona)
  • Patients must be primary residents of Texas or Arizona
  • Patients able to speak and read English
  • Patients are 18 years old and above
  • Patients should have a cancer diagnosis, cancer-associated pain, and taking strong opioids (morphine, oxycodone, hydrocodone, hydromorphone, oxymorphone, methadone, fentanyl)
  • Patients who have used in the past 3 months or are using alternative botanical pain management while under prescription opioids

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who are not able to speak or read English
  • Altered mental status as determined by the interviewer based on the ability to understand the nature of the study and consent process
  • Patients who have not used medical marijuana and/or CBD products
  • Patients who do not have cancer
  • Patients who do not have cancer-associated pain
  • Patients who are not taking opioids

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Observational (medical record review, questionnaires))
Patients' medical records are reviewed and then complete questionnaires over 27 minutes.
Other: Electronic Health Record Review
Medical records reviewed
Other: Questionnaire Administration
Complete questionnaires

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of patients who prefer opioids with THC-marijuana and/or opioids with cannabidiol (CBD) to opioids alone for their cancer pain relief
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Will be calculated and reported along with a 95% confidence interval.
through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Perception of cancer-related symptom relief
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Will be associated with use of THC-Marijuana and/or CBD. Will be evaluated by generalized linear mixed models to account for the dependency among those patients who have used/are using both.
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Patient perception of THC-marijuana and/or CBD
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Compared to cancer treatments in treatment of cancer. Will be evaluated by generalized linear mixed models to account for the dependency among those patients who have used/are using both.
through study completion, an average of 1 year
To evaluate patient report of adverse effects experienced while using THC-marijuana and/or CBD
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Patient reported outcomes will be summarized by frequency and proportion.
through study completion, an average of 1 year
To evaluate patient reported concerns while using THC-marijuana and/or CBD
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Patient reported outcomes will be summarized by frequency and proportion.
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Patient attitude of dosing, forms and use of THC-marijuana and/or CBD
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Patient reported outcomes will be summarized by frequency and proportion.
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Demographic, physical and psychosocial factors that influence patient perception and attitudes of THC-marijuana and/or CBD
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Will be evaluated by Wilcoxon rank sum (Kruskal-Wallis) test or chi-square (Fisher's exact) test, when appropriate. To further evaluate these associations, univariate and multivariable logistic regression models will be fitted. Multiple comparisons will be adjusted where appropriate.
through study completion, an average of 1 year
To explore the difference of patient perception of THC-marijuana and CBD in cancer centers in a legalized vs. a non-legalized state.
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Differences will be explored.
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Patient reported preference of THC-Marijuana and CBD for cancer pain and symptom relief of patients
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Will be explored between a Supportive Care Center vs. Integrative Medicine Center at University of Texas (U.T.) MD Anderson. Will be evaluated by Wilcoxon rank sum (Kruskal-Wallis) test or chi-square (Fisher's exact) test, when appropriate. To further evaluate these associations, univariate and multivariable logistic regression models will be fitted. Multiple comparisons will be adjusted where appropriate.
through study completion, an average of 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Kimberson C Tanco, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 3, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 2, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 2, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 22, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 1, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 6, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 5, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 3, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2019-0753 (Other Identifier: M D Anderson Cancer Center)
  • NCI-2021-02853 (Registry Identifier: CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program))

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hematopoietic and Lymphoid Cell Neoplasm

Clinical Trials on Electronic Health Record Review

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings