Patient Reported Symptom Control With THC or CBD Use

March 3, 2026 updated by: M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
This study compares patients' attitudes regarding marijuana products for medical use and other treatments for cancer-related pain. This study may help researchers gain better understanding of patient's perception on their use of marijuana products in treating cancer-related pain and other common cancer-related symptoms.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:

I. To determine the patient's reported preference for cancer pain improvement with opioids, opioids with delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)-marijuana and/or opioids with cannabidiol (CBD).

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To determine the association between perception of cancer-related symptom relief and use of THC-marijuana and/or CBD.

II. To compare patient perception of THC-marijuana and/or CBD versus (vs.) cancer treatments in treatment of cancer.

III. To evaluate patient report of adverse effects experienced while using THC-marijuana and/or CBD.

IV. To evaluate patient reported concerns while using THC-marijuana and/or CBD. V. To evaluate patient attitude of dosing, forms and use of THC-marijuana and/or CBD.

VI. To evaluate demographic, physical and psychosocial factors that influence patient perception and attitudes of THC-marijuana and/or CBD.

VII. To explore the difference of patient perception of THC-marijuana and CBD in cancer centers in a legalized vs. a non-legalized state.

VIII. To explore the patient reported preference of THC-marijuana and CBD for cancer pain and symptom relief of patients in a Supportive Care Center vs. Integrative Medicine Center at University of Texas (U.T.) MD Anderson.

OUTLINE:

Patients' medical records are reviewed and then complete questionnaires over 27 minutes.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

200

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Arizona
      • Gilbert, Arizona, United States, 85234
        • Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • M D Anderson Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients (inpatient or outpatient) seen by the Palliative Care and Integrative Medicine teams at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (Texas) and the Palliative Care team at Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center (Arizona)

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients (inpatient or outpatient) seen by the Palliative Care and Integrative Medicine teams at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (Texas) and the Palliative Care team at Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center (Arizona)
  • Patients must be primary residents of Texas or Arizona
  • Patients able to speak and read English
  • Patients are 18 years old and above
  • Patients should have a cancer diagnosis, cancer-associated pain, and taking strong opioids (morphine, oxycodone, hydrocodone, hydromorphone, oxymorphone, methadone, fentanyl)
  • Patients who have used in the past 3 months or are using alternative botanical pain management while under prescription opioids

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who are not able to speak or read English
  • Altered mental status as determined by the interviewer based on the ability to understand the nature of the study and consent process
  • Patients who have not used medical marijuana and/or CBD products
  • Patients who do not have cancer
  • Patients who do not have cancer-associated pain
  • Patients who are not taking opioids

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Observational (medical record review, questionnaires))
Patients' medical records are reviewed and then complete questionnaires over 27 minutes.
Medical records reviewed
Complete questionnaires

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of patients who prefer opioids with THC-marijuana and/or opioids with cannabidiol (CBD) to opioids alone for their cancer pain relief
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Will be calculated and reported along with a 95% confidence interval.
through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Perception of cancer-related symptom relief
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Will be associated with use of THC-Marijuana and/or CBD. Will be evaluated by generalized linear mixed models to account for the dependency among those patients who have used/are using both.
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Patient perception of THC-marijuana and/or CBD
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Compared to cancer treatments in treatment of cancer. Will be evaluated by generalized linear mixed models to account for the dependency among those patients who have used/are using both.
through study completion, an average of 1 year
To evaluate patient report of adverse effects experienced while using THC-marijuana and/or CBD
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Patient reported outcomes will be summarized by frequency and proportion.
through study completion, an average of 1 year
To evaluate patient reported concerns while using THC-marijuana and/or CBD
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Patient reported outcomes will be summarized by frequency and proportion.
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Patient attitude of dosing, forms and use of THC-marijuana and/or CBD
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Patient reported outcomes will be summarized by frequency and proportion.
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Demographic, physical and psychosocial factors that influence patient perception and attitudes of THC-marijuana and/or CBD
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Will be evaluated by Wilcoxon rank sum (Kruskal-Wallis) test or chi-square (Fisher's exact) test, when appropriate. To further evaluate these associations, univariate and multivariable logistic regression models will be fitted. Multiple comparisons will be adjusted where appropriate.
through study completion, an average of 1 year
To explore the difference of patient perception of THC-marijuana and CBD in cancer centers in a legalized vs. a non-legalized state.
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Differences will be explored.
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Patient reported preference of THC-Marijuana and CBD for cancer pain and symptom relief of patients
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Will be explored between a Supportive Care Center vs. Integrative Medicine Center at University of Texas (U.T.) MD Anderson. Will be evaluated by Wilcoxon rank sum (Kruskal-Wallis) test or chi-square (Fisher's exact) test, when appropriate. To further evaluate these associations, univariate and multivariable logistic regression models will be fitted. Multiple comparisons will be adjusted where appropriate.
through study completion, an average of 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kimberson C Tanco, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 3, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 2, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 2, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 22, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 1, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

May 6, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 5, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 3, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2019-0753 (Other Identifier: M D Anderson Cancer Center)
  • NCI-2021-02853 (Registry Identifier: CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program))

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hematopoietic and Lymphoid Cell Neoplasm

Clinical Trials on Electronic Health Record Review

Subscribe