Comparison of the Effects of Two Frequencies of Application of Photobiomodulation on Facial Rejuvenation
Comparison of the Effects of Two Frequencies of Application of Photobiomodulation on Facial Rejuvenation: Controlled, Randomized and Double-Blind Clinical Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
São Paulo, Brazil, 01525-000
- Recruiting
- Nove de Julho University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Female volunteers aged 45 to 60 years;
- At menopause (at least 12 months without menstruation);
- Healthy;
- Skin phototype I to IV by Fitzpatrick classification;
- Visible signs of skin aging grades III and IV of the Glogau scale.
Exclusion Criteria:
- With a history of photosensitivity.
- Who have any type of lesion on the skin of the face.
- Who use corticosteroids, anticoagulants, or any drug known to increase photosensitivity, including systemic retinoids and use of topical retinoic acid in the last 6 months.
- People with any collagen-related diseases, malnutrition, anemia, immunosuppression, cancer diseases, smokers, predisposition to hypertrophic and keloid scarring, history of dermatological diseases, surgery on the face, trauma to the face, diseases that could affect the condition of the skin and disease psychiatric.
- Who are in the menstrual period, in the climacteric or in hormone replacement therapy.
- Who underwent cosmetic procedures on the face, such as application of botulinum toxin in the last 8 months, facial filling in the last year, chemical peels, ablative laser and dermabrasion in the last 6 months.
- Who do not respect the post treatment recommendations or who fail to attend a treatment session.
- Those that, during the procedures, present any type of complication (hypersensitivity, allergies) will not be part of the statistical analysis, as these cases will not be in the expected pattern for these procedures. However, these data will be described and discussed, as well as the possible adverse effects and the participants will receive treatment to resolve the condition
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: DOUBLE
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Photobiomodulation twice a week
This group will receive the application of photobiomodulation (PBM) twice a week for 4 weeks.
|
The photobiomodulation will be applied with a LED facial mask, Cosmedical brand (São Paulo, Brazil), containing 92 red LEDs, 660 nm of wavelength, in continuous mode for 21 minutes, twice a week, for 4 weeks.
|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Photobiomodulation three times a week
This group will receive the application of photobiomodulation (PBM) three times a week for 4 weeks.
|
The photobiomodulation will be applied with a LED facial mask, Cosmedical brand (São Paulo, Brazil), containing 92 red LEDs, 660 nm of wavelength, in continuous mode for 21 minutes, three times a week, for 4 weeks.
|
|
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Simulated Photobiomodulation
This group will receive the application of simulated photobiomodulation (PBM) twice a week for 4 weeks.
|
Photobiomodulation will be simulated, with the device turned off, twice a week, for 4 weeks.
The characteristic sound of the device will be triggered by recording.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Changes in the scale of evaluation of wrinkles
Time Frame: Baseline and one month after treatment.
|
The evaluation of wrinkles will be carried out in a standardized way using the Wrinkle Assessment Scale.
In a specific and reserved room, digitalized photographs of the face will be taken in the positions: front, 45 degrees right and left with Canon digital camera model SX510 HS 12.1 MP, using white LED lighting, turquoise blue background, 50cm face distance, manual macro mode, standard that will be followed in the photographs after one month of treatment.
The images will be distributed to the three plastic surgeons who will classify them according to the scale of wrinkles and photographic models pre-defined.
Each evaluator will receive the same image of wrinkles, all at the end of the experiment.
Each image should receive a score from 0 (no wrinkles) to 5 (very deep wrinkles) using the Wrinkle Assessment Scale.
The data obtained will be grouped and the evolutionary comparison will be made according to the group of the patient under study.
|
Baseline and one month after treatment.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Changes in wrinkle size (wrinkle width and depth)
Time Frame: Baseline and one month after treatment.
|
Before treatment and after 1 month, molds of the frontal lines will be made with light condensation silicone (Clonage, DFL Indústria e Comércio, RJ, Brazil).
The silicone mold obtained will be poured into special plaster in a short time.
Plaster models will be sent for optical coherence tomography analysis and wrinkle width and depth measured before treatment and after 1 month.
|
Baseline and one month after treatment.
|
|
Changes in satisfaction with facial appearance through FACE-Q
Time Frame: Baseline and one month after treatment.
|
Participants will answer the FACE-Q questionnaire (satisfaction with facial appearance, adapted for the Portuguese language).
FACE-Q is a tool developed to measure the impact and effectiveness of facial aesthetic procedures from the patients' perspective.The results will be tabulated and evaluated according to the sum of the scores obtained in the 10 questions.
The higher the score, the more satisfied.
|
Baseline and one month after treatment.
|
|
Quantitative evaluation of wrinkles through the measurement of pixels by the Image J software
Time Frame: Baseline and one month after treatment.
|
In a specific and reserved room, digitalized photographs of the face will be taken in the positions: front, 45 degrees right and left with Canon digital camera model SX510 HS 12.1 MP, using white LED lighting, turquoise blue background, 50cm face distance and manual macro mode.
The quantification in pixels of wrinkles on the forehead, glabellar region, periorbital region and nasolabial fold will be analyzed with Image J software before and after one month of treatment.
|
Baseline and one month after treatment.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Study Start
Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- FacialRej
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.