Benadamustine, Fludarabine and Busulfan Conditioning in Recipients of Haploidentical Stem Cell Transplantation (FluBuBe) (FluBuBe)

May 6, 2024 updated by: Ivan S Moiseev, St. Petersburg State Pavlov Medical University
Haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation irrespective of the conditioning and graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis is associated with high frequency of primary and secondary graft failure. Different technologies of with replete or depleted graft are associated with 10-20% of graft failures. Fludarabine and busulfan conditioning is the most commonly used approach for a variety of disease. Furthermore combination of fludarabine and bendamustine was sufficient to facilitate engraftment in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and lymphomas. The aim of the study is to evaluate whether addition of bendamustine to fladarabine and busulfan conditioning reduces the risk of primary graft failure after haploidentical allograft.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
50

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.
  • Name: Ivan S Moiseev, MD, Prof.
  • Phone Number: +79217961951
  • Email: moisiv@mail.ru

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Russian Federation
      • Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation, 197022
        • RM Gorbacheva Research Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients must have an indication for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with myeloablative conditioning for malignant disease
  • Patients with 5-9/10 HLA-matched related donor available. The donor and recipient must be identical by the following genetic loci: HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-Cw, HLA-DRB1, and HLA-DQB1.
  • Peripheral blood stem cells or bone marrow as a graft source
  • No second malignancies requiring treatment
  • No severe concurrent illness

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Titer of anti-HLA antibodies ≥ 5000 at the time of inclusion
  • Moderate or severe cardiac dysfunction, left ventricular ejection fraction <50%
  • Moderate or severe decrease in pulmonary function, FEV1 <70% or DLCO<70% of predicted
  • Respiratory distress >grade I
  • Severe organ dysfunction: AST or ALT >5 upper normal limits, bilirubin >1.5 upper normal limits, creatinine >2 upper normal limits
  • Creatinine clearance < 60 mL/min
  • Uncontrolled bacterial or fungal infection at the time of enrollment
  • Requirement for vasopressor support at the time of enrollment
  • Karnofsky index <30%
  • Pregnancy
  • Somatic or psychiatric disorder making the patient unable to sign informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: FluBuBe
Days -7 through -2: Fludarabine 30 mg/m2/day iv x 6 days; Days -7 through -6: Bendamustine 130 mg/m2 iv x 2 days; Days -5 through -3: Busulfan 1 mg/kg po qid x 3 days; Days +3 through +4: Cyclophosphamide 50 mg/kg iv x 2 days; Days +5 through +35: Mycophenolate mofetil 45 mg/kg/day, maximum 3 g/day, iv or po x 30 days; Days +5 through +150: Tacrolimus 0.03 mg/kg/day with further correction by concentration
Drug: Fludarabine
30 mg/m2/day iv x 6 days, days -7 through -2 of HSCT
Drug: Bendamustine Hydrochloride
130 mg/m2 iv x 2 days, Days -7 through -6 of HSCT
Drug: Busulfan
1 mg/kg po qid x 3 days, Days -5 through -3
Drug: Cyclophosphamide
50 mg/kg iv x 2 days, Days +3 through +4
Drug: Mycophenolate Mofetil
45 mg/kg/day, maximum 3 g/day, iv or po x 30 days, Days +5 through +35
Drug: Tacrolimus 5Mg Cap
0.03 mg/kg/day iv or po, Days +5 through +100 with with further correction by concentration. Target concentration 5-15 ng/ml.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
- Incidence of primary and secondary graft failure
Time Frame: 100 days
Proportion of patients with primary and secondary graft failure defined by the absence of donor chimerism
100 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
- Incidence of HSCT-associated adverse events (safety and toxicity)
Time Frame: 125 days
Toxicity assessment is based on NCI CTC AE 5.0 grades. Veno-occlusive disease incidence and severity assessment is based on EBMT criteria 2016. Transplant-associated microangiopathy incidence assessment is based on Cho et al. criteria. All toxicity measurements will be aggregated as severity scores.
125 days
- Infectious complications, including analysis of severe bacterial, fungal and viral infections incidence
Time Frame: [ Time Frame: 100 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
Proportion of patients, requiring systemic treatment for bacterial, viral and fungal disease
[ Time Frame: 100 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Incidence of acute GVHD grade II-IV
Time Frame: 125 days
Cumulative incidence of patients with acute GVHD II-IV grade
125 days
- Incidence of moderate and severe chronic GVHD
Time Frame: 365 days
Cumulative incidence of patients with moderate and severe chronic GVHD according to NIH 2015 criteria.
365 days
- Non-relapse mortality analysis
Time Frame: 2 years
Cumulative incidence of patients with mortality without hematological relapse of malignancy
2 years
- Overall survival analysis
Time Frame: 2 years
Kaplan-Meier estimate of death from all causes
2 years
- Event-free survival analysis
Time Frame: 2 years
Kaplan-Meier estimate of death or relapse
2 years
- Relapse rate analysis
Time Frame: 2 years
Cumulative incidence of patients with relapse
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
St. Petersburg State Pavlov Medical University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 21, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 30, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 21, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 21, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 28, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 7, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 6, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 06/21-n

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Request for sharing data with the study plan for the data will be evaluated under common conditions by Pavlov University Ethical Committee.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings