Investigating Medication vs. Prostatic Urethral Lift: Assessment and Comparison of Therapies for BPH (IMPACT)
Investigating Medication vs. Prostatic Urethral Lift: Assessment and Comparison of Therapies for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Rogers Mitchell
- Phone Number: 805-403-7107
- Email: rogers.mitchell@neotract.com
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
Pleasanton, California, United States, 94588
- Recruiting
- Neotract
-
Contact:
- Rogers Mitchell
- Phone Number: 925-329-6493
- Email: USPLEClinicalPayments@teleflex.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Male 45 years of age or older
- Diagnosis of BPH
- Experiencing symptoms of BPH as indicated by an IPSS ≥8 and ≤30
- Willing to wash out of current BPH medication(s), as applicable
- An appropriate candidate for both BPH therapies evaluated in this study.
- Ability to understand and consent to participate in this study
- Willing and able to participate in follow-up evaluations
Exclusion Criteria:
- Use of alpha blocker for BPH unless washed-out for 30 days
- Use of daily phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor (PDE5i) for BPH unless washed-out for 30 days
- 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors for BPH used within 6 months of therapy initiation
- Current urinary tract infection or prostatitis
- Current gross hematuria
- Urinary incontinence presumed due to incompetent sphincter
- Catheter-dependent urinary retention within 1 month prior to enrollment
- Prostate volume greater than 100 cc as measured by TRUS
- Prostate specific antigen level of greater than 10 ng/ml within one year of enrollment unless prostate cancer has been ruled out
- History of neurogenic or atonic bladder
- History prostate cancer treatment
- Known to be hypersensitive to tamsulosin HCl or any component of tamsulosin HCl capsules
- Known allergy to nickel, titanium, or stainless steel
- Prior minimally invasive or surgical intervention for BPH
- Urethral conditions that may prevent insertion of delivery system into bladder.
- Currently enrolled in any other investigational clinical research trial that has not completed the primary endpoint
- History of medical, surgical or other conditions that, in the opinion of the investigator, would interfere with the treatment or evaluation of the subject
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Prostatic Lift
Treatment with the UroLift System
|
Prostatic lift
|
|
Active Comparator: Medication
Treatment with Tamsulosin HCl 0.4mg
|
Tamsulosin HCl 0.4mg
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Paired comparison of International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) percent change
Time Frame: 3 Months after Therapy Initiation
|
The primary study analysis compares the change in BPH symptoms in the PUL Arm to the change in BPH symptoms in the MED Arm measured 3 months after BPH therapy initiation.
This will be measure by International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) percent change.
IPSS ranges from 0-35, healthier patients have lower scores than patients more effected by BPH symptoms.
|
3 Months after Therapy Initiation
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Quality of Life (QoL)
Time Frame: 3 months after BPH Therapy Initiation
|
The secondary analysis assesses the change in quality of life (QoL) due to urinary symptoms between the PUL and MED Arms measured 3 months after initiation of BPH therapy.
This will be measured by change in QoL, ranging from 0-6.
Healthier patients have lower scores than patients more effected by BPH symptoms.
|
3 months after BPH Therapy Initiation
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Claus Roehrborn, M.D., University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- CP00014
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.