Study of ADI-PEG 20, Venetoclax and Azacitidine in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

January 16, 2026 updated by: Polaris Group

Phase IA/B Combination Study of ADI-PEG 20, Venetoclax and Azacitidine in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

Pegylated arginine deiminase (ADI-PEG 20) will be combined with venetoclax and azacitidine for treatment of subjects with previously treated or untreated with high risk factor acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Venetoclax and azacitidine are front-line therapy for such patients, and ADI-PEG 20 will be added to this regimen in a phase IA/B study.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is an open label, single arm, phase 1 trial with recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) cohorts based on subject inclusion criteria.

Lead In: 6 patients will be enrolled to be treated with standard dose of azacitidine and venetoclax and the expected RP2D of ADI-PEG 20 (dose level 0). In case of DLT occurring in >1 patient in cycle 1, 6 additional patients will be accrued at dose level -1 of ADI-PEG 20 while keeping the doses of azacitidine and venetoclax unchanged (Dose level -1). Enrollment to cohort 1 and 2 will start after ≤1 patient out of 6 encounters DLT in cycle 1 at one of these dose levels. The 6 patients enrolled at that dose level will be counted for efficacy analysis. Cohort 1: Relapsed or refractory AML: target response 25%. Historical expectation for venetoclax and azacitidine is 15%.

Cohort 2: Newly diagnosed high risk AML: Target response 55%. Historical expectation for venetoclax and azacitidine is 40%.

Treatment may be continued for a maximum of 24 cycles or 104 doses of ADI-PEG 20 (study Week 103), whichever is reached first.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
38

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Florida
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33136
        • Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center
    • North Carolina
      • Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, 28204
        • Levine Cancer Institute
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • MD Anderson Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 99 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Cohort 1: Previously treated (relapsed/recurrent) or refractory AML based on the 2022 revision to the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria (Arber 2022)
  • Cohort 2: Untreated AML per 2022 WHO (Arber 2022) criteria with high-risk features and not a candidate for intensive chemotherapy because of age 60 years or older, age-related comorbidities, cardiac disease, prior anthracycline use, high probability of treatment-related mortality, or otherwise would not benefit from intensive chemotherapy treatment.
  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Life expectancy reasonably adequate for evaluating the treatment
  • White blood cell (WBC) count of 10 × 109/L or less. (Use of hydroxyurea to control WBC is allowed till 48 hours prior to protocol treatment)
  • Adequate renal function: Creatinine ≤ 1.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN) or creatinine clearance > 40 mL/minute (measured or calculated according to the Cockcroft-Gault formula)

  • Adequate liver function

    • Total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 x ULN
    • ALT and AST both ≤ 2.5 x institutional ULN or ≤ 5 times the ULN for patients with leukemic involvement of liver

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior treatments as follows:

    1. Cohort 1: >2 cycles of prior combination treatment with venetoclax+hypomethelating agent (i.e. azacitidine, decitabine) is exclusionary. All other prior treatment for antecedent hematological disorders and/or for AML is permitted.
    2. Cohort 2: Prior treatment for antecedent hematological disorders with venetoclax or chemotherapy or any prior treatment for their AML is exclusionary. However, treatment with other agents, including hydroxyurea or ≤2 cycles of hypomethylating agent (i.e. azacitidine, decitabine), for MDS or myeloproliferative neoplasm is permitted.
  • Cohort 2: Favorable risk AML per European LeukemiaNet (ELN) 2022 criteria (Döhner 2022)
  • Known active CNS involvement by leukemia

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Previously Treated AML
Previously treated AML based on the revised revised 2022 WHO criteria with age at least 18 years.
Drug: ADI-PEG 20
ADI-PEG 20 in combination with venetoclax and azacitidine
Other Names:
  • Azacitidine
  • Venetoclax
Experimental: Untreated AML With High Risk Features
Untreated AML per 2022 WHO criteria with high-risk features and not a candidate for intensive chemotherapy because of age 60 years or older, age-related comorbidities, cardiac disease, prior anthracycline use, high probability of treatment-related mortality, or otherwise would not benefit from intensive chemotherapy treatment.
Drug: ADI-PEG 20
ADI-PEG 20 in combination with venetoclax and azacitidine
Other Names:
  • Azacitidine
  • Venetoclax

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Determine the RP2D of ADI-PEG 20 in combination with venetoclax and azacitidine, per the number of subjects with treatment-related adverse events by current CTCAE
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Determine preliminary evidence of tumor activity, per the revised 2017 European LeukemiaNet criteria
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years
Determine the peripheral blood arginine levels of ADI-PEG 20 in combination with venetoclax and azacitidine
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years
Determine the peripheral blood citrulline levels of ADI-PEG 20 in combination with venetoclax and azacitidine
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years
Determine the anti-drug antibodies of ADI-PEG 20 in combination with venetoclax and azacitidine
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Polaris Group

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: John S Bomalaski, MD, Polaris Group

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 5, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 26, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 3, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 12, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 21, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 16, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • POLARIS2020-002

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings