Improving Ventilatory Capacity in Those With Chronic High Level SCI

September 16, 2025 updated by: J. Andrew Taylor, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital
The purpose of this study is to find out if taking the drug Buspar will increase breathing capacity in individuals with spinal cord injuries.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Chemoreceptive regulatory feedback is crucial for precise ventilatory control, especially during exercise. However, individuals with high-level SCI have a reduced chemoreceptive drive to breathe. Studies have shown lesser increases in minute ventilation and mouth pressure during hypercapnia in those with tetraplegia. Peripheral factors rather than central factors appear to cause the reduction of the ventilatory response to hypercapnia. This reduced ventilatory drive may have functional impact on exercise ventilation in patients with high level SCI and enhancing ventilatory drive may improve exercise ventilation in high-level SCI.

Currently, there are no treatments to overcome these functional deficits that affect daily activity and exercise-based rehabilitation recovery. However, previous work in an animal model of SCI has found that that a serotonin agonist markedly increases respiratory responses to carbon dioxide. Treatment with a serotonin 5HT1A agonist effectively improved the ventilatory drive after both acute and chronic spinal cord injuries in rats. One potential mechanism is increased excitability of the ventral motoneurons that have survived the spinal cord injury. 5-HT1A receptors do exist on these neurons, and when activated, amplify the excitatory output. Another mechanism resides at the intercostal and abdominal muscle afferents which influence supraspinal respiratory group neurons in the brainstem and motor output to the muscles of breathing. Hence, serotonin agonists may act on neural pathways in the spinal cord responsible for transferring afferent information from intercostal muscles to supraspinal centers. Lastly, 5-HT1A receptors may also be involved in functional plasticity of neural respiratory pathways, in particular ipsilateral phrenic nerve activity. Up regulation of 5-HT1A receptors due to denervation supersensitivity could result in postsynaptic hyperresponsivity due to loss of descending input.

BuSpar/Buspirone is a serotonin 5HT1A agonist and used as an anxiolytic in humans. It does not cause sedation, has minimal effects on psychomotor performance or cognition, and has low threshold for abuse potential or dependence liability. Prior studies have found Buspirone to be well tolerated. It has been used safely in spinal cord injury, but not for respiratory purposes. (Though there is one clinical trial in process: Role of Enhancing Serotonin Receptors Activity for Sleep Apnea Treatment in Patients with SCI.) However, Buspirone up to 60 mg daily has been used to treat disturbed respiratory rhythms in multiple sclerosis, brain cancer, and brainstem infarction. Interestingly, in patients with COPD, a 14-day oral administration of buspirone (20 mg) found improved anxiety and depression as well as increased exercise tolerance with lesser sensations of dyspnea. Hence, buspirone may offer a treatment to improve hypercapnic ventilatory drive. Given that oral administration of 30 mg results in peak plasma levels at one hour and that the average elimination half life is about 2 to 3 hours, buspirone is an attractive and safe approach to exploring the ability to improve respiratory responses to exercise and/or hypercapnia exposure in those with high level spinal cord injury that limits breathing capacity.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
13

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Massachusetts
      • Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States, 02138
        • Spaulding Hospital Cambridge

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 50 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Chronic high-level SCI (at least 24-months post injury)
  • Age 18 to 50 years.
  • Medically stable
  • Spinal Cord Injury ≥T3
  • American Spinal Injury Association grade A or B or C.
  • Able to perform arm crank exercise.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cardiomyopathy
  • High blood pressure( >140/90 mmHg or you are taking high blood pressure medication)
  • Significant irregular heartbeat
  • Heart disease
  • Chronic lung disease (COPD, bronchitis)
  • Current use of cardioactive or antidepressant drugs
  • Family history of significant irregular heart beat or sudden cardiac death
  • Orthostatic hypotension (symptomatic fall in blood pressure >30 mmHg when upright)
  • Current grade 2 or greater pressure ulcers at relevant contact site
  • Neurological disease (stroke, peripheral neuropathy, myopathy)
  • Arm or shoulder conditions that limit ability to perform arm crank exercise
  • History of bleeding disorder, diabetes, kidney disease, cancer, other neurological disease
  • Recent weigh change (greater than 10 pounds)
  • Regular use of tobacco
  • Intrathecal baclofen pump,
  • Current use of cardioactive, antidepressant, other sedating agents
  • Suicidal ideation
  • Pregnant and/or breastfeeding women.

In addition, subjects must have no known hypersensitivity to Buspar and must not be taking a monoamine oxidase inhibitor.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Subjects take placebo pills (twice a day) for 14 Days.
Drug: Placebo
Subjects take placebo pills (twice a day) for 14 Days.
Other Names:
  • Control
Active Comparator: Buspirone

Subjects take 30 mg buspirone HCl (15 mg twice a day) for 14 Days.

Other Names:

Buspar
Drug: Buspirone
Subjects take 30 mg buspirone HCl (15 mg twice a day) for 14 Days.
Other Names:
  • BuSpar, Buspirone Hydrochloride

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hypercapnic Ventilatory Response
Time Frame: 14 Days
A change in the drive to breathe with a change in carbon dioxide
14 Days
Exercise Pulmonary Capacity
Time Frame: 14 Days
Change in peak oxygen consumption during exercise
14 Days
Pulmonary Function
Time Frame: 14 Days
Forced expiratory volume over 1 second (FEV1).
14 Days
Sleep Quality
Time Frame: 14 Days
Sleep apneas and hypopneas per hour.
14 Days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 29, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 1, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 6, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 7, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 13, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 18, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 16, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2016P002409

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spinal Cord Injuries

Clinical Trials on Placebo

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings