RapiGEN BIOCREDIT Malaria Ag RDTs WHO Prequalification Study

October 12, 2023 updated by: Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, Switzerland

Clinical Performance of RapiGEN BIOCREDIT Malaria Ag RDTs for Detection of Plasmodium Infections in Patients With Symptoms Suggestive of Malaria

Since their introduction in the late 90's, rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) have markedly improved our ability to control malaria; yet they have inherent limitations which include low sensitivity in Plasmodium vivax detection and inability to detect hrp2/3 gene deleted Plasmodium falciparum parasites. In addition, the spread of P. falciparum parasites lacking hrp2 gene jeopardizes the long-term use of P. falciparum-specific HRP2-based RDTs.

A partnership between RapiGEN, FIND, and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) is addressing these limitations by developing five novel malaria RDTs with improved pLDH and HRP2 detection.

RapiGEN has also developed three novel malaria RDTs - BIOCREDIT Malaria Ag Pf/Pv (pLDH/pLDH), BIOCREDIT Malaria Ag Pf (pLDH/HRP2) and BIOCREDIT Malaria Ag Pf (pLDH) - to address these drawbacks. The BIOCREDIT Malaria Ag Pf/Pv (pLDH/pLDH) is a combo test that detects P. falciparum and P. vivax on a single device. BIOCREDIT Malaria Ag Pf (pLDH/HRP2) targets both PfLDH and HRP2 antigens in P. falciparum; and BIOCREDIT Malaria Ag Pf (pLDH) has improved detection of pLDH in P. falciparum.

In countries with circulation of hrp2/3 deleted P. falciparum malaria parasites or high P. vivax burden, these improved RDTs may be invaluable in malaria elimination.

This study is a prospective and retrospective evaluation of RapiGEN's BIOCREDIT Malaria Ag RDTs in malaria-endemic countries to assess their clinical performance for detection of malaria. The purpose of this study is to provide a high level outline of the study design and conduct to support the collation of a data package for WHO Pre-Qualification proposed study.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Malaria continues to create a major health burden in the tropics especially in Africa. Introduction of Artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) has dramatically improved the outcomes of morbidity and mortality of malaria cases. Introduction of RDTs as well dramatically influenced cases detection hence treatment. The situation in Sudan is not different from the general picture in all Africa and witness great reduction of deaths from malaria since the introduction of ACT in 2005 (1). The national protocol depends now on Giemsa stained slides microcopy or certified RDTs for diagnosis and ACT as first and second line of treatment (2).

Recommendation by World Health Organization (WHO) on parasitological confirmation of malaria cases by microscopy or rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) before treatment increased the use and availability of RDTs worldwide (3).

Rapid diagnostic tests, since their introduction in the late 90's, have dramatically improved our ability to control malaria. Most RDTs are based on histidine-rich protein 2 (PfHRP2) or lactate dehydrogenase (pLDH), which are present in Plasmodium falciparum only and all human-infecting Plasmodium species respectively (4). However, the gradual spread of hrp2/hrp3-deleted mutants in several endemic countries in South America, Asia and Africa exerts a substantial potential impact on the utility of HRP2-based RDTs for case management in these settings.

Plasmodium lactate dehydrogenase (pLDH), on the other hand, appears as a good alternative to HRP2 as it is an essential protein expressed by all human-infecting Plasmodium species; however, pLDH-based RDTs were shown to perform poorly at low parasitaemia, which is common among patients infected with P. vivax, P. malariae and P. ovale species as well as in asymptomatic infections. Therefore, it is less preferred in endemic-countries. In these settings, malaria microscopy holds its reign as the standard of reference thanks to its low direct cost and ability to detect, quantify, and differentiate malaria parasites. However, it is also labour-intensive, time-consuming and expertise-demanding.

With the aim of addressing these limitations, RapiGEN has developed novel malaria RDTs, in partnership with FIND and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF). RapiGEN developed BIOCREDIT Malaria Ag Pf/Pv (pLDH/pLDH), BIOCREDIT Malaria Ag Pf (pLDH/HRP2) and BIOCREDIT Malaria Ag Pf.

These may provide added value compared to currently available malaria RDTs, especially in settings where current tests prove to be insufficient due to hrp2 deletion or high burden of P. vivax malaria.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
674

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Indonesia
      • Jakarta, Indonesia, 10430
        • Eijkman Institute for Molecular Biology
  • Sudan
      • Khartoum, Sudan
        • Institute of Endemic Diseases, Medical Campus

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

5 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with symptoms suggestive of malaria seeking clinical care in health facilities. All patients will be assessed for eligibility of enrollment and those who full filled the criteria will be recruited in the study after signing an informed consent.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 5 years old or older
  • Presenting at the study site with fever or a history of fever during the preceding 48 hours
  • Freely agreeing to participate by providing informed consent (and assent, if applicable)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of symptoms and signs of severe illness and/or central nervous system infections as defined by WHO guidelines

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Point estimates of BIOCREDIT Malaria Ag Pf
Time Frame: 2 months
Point estimates of diagnostic accuracy characteristics (sensitivity, specificity, NPV, PPV) with 95% confidence intervals for BIOCREDIT Malaria Ag Pf (pLDH/HRP2) and BIOCREDIT Malaria Ag Pf (pLDH) using the reference test (nPCR) as standard of truth for the detection of P. falciparum infections in patients with symptoms suggestive of malaria
2 months
Point estimate of BIOCREDIT Malaria Ag Pf/Pv (pLDH/pLDH)
Time Frame: 2 months
Point estimates of diagnostic accuracy characteristics (sensitivity, specificity, NPV, PPV) with 95% confidence intervals for BIOCREDIT Malaria Ag Pf/Pv (pLDH/pLDH) using the reference test as standard of truth for the detection of P. falciparum and P.vivax infections in patients with symptoms suggestive of malaria
2 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Point estimates of comparator tests
Time Frame: 2 months
Point estimates of diagnostic accuracy characteristics (sensitivity, specificity, NPV, PPV) with 95% confidence intervals of comparator tests using the reference test as standard of truth for the detection of P. falciparum and, P.vivax infections in patients with symptoms suggestive of malaria
2 months
Frequencies of hrp2/3 gene deletions
Time Frame: 2 months
Frequencies of P. falciparum infections containing HRP2 and/or HRP3 mutations and the impact of those on HRP2-based RDT diagnostic accuracy
2 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, Switzerland

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
University of Khartoum
Eijkman Institute for Molecular Biology

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 30, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 7, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 7, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 20, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 13, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 12, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • MA016 RapiGEN

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Malaria

Clinical Trials on Rapid diagnostic test

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings