Abbott NxTekTM Malaria RDT WHO Prequalification Study

Clinical Performance of NxTekTM Malaria P.f Plus Rapid Diagnostic Test Device and NxTekTM Malaria P.f/P.v Plus Rapid Diagnostic Test Device for the Detection of Plasmodium Infections in Patients With Symptoms Suggestive of Malaria for WHO Prequalification

Since their introduction in the late 90's, rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) have dramatically improved our ability to control malaria but proved insufficient to support elimination efforts because of their limited sensitivity, especially for P. vivax. In addition, the spread of P. falciparum parasites lacking hrp2 gene jeopardizes the long-term use of P. falciparum-specific HRP2-based RDTs. A partnership between Abbott, FIND, PATH, and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) is addressing these limitations by developing two novel malaria RDTs with improved pLDH detection: a P. falciparum-specific test targeting both the HRP2 and PfLDH antigens on a single test line (NxTekTM Malaria P.f plus Rapid Diagnostic Test Device), and a P. falciparum/P. vivax combo test additionally targeting the PvLDH antigen on a second test line (NxTekTM Malaria P.f/P.v. plus Rapid Diagnostic Test Device).

These new combo tests with improved pLDH detection may provide added value compared to currently available malaria RDTs, especially in settings where current tests prove to be insufficient due to hrp2 deletion or high burden of P. vivax malaria.

Abbott, PATH, and FIND will conduct a prospective evaluation of NxTekTM Malaria P.f plus and NxTekTM Malaria P.f/P.v plus RDTs in malaria-endemic countries to assess their clinical performance for detection of malaria and usability in their intended-use settings. This is in support of a submission for WHO Prequalification.The purpose of this synopsis is to describe key points of alignment in study design and conduct across the portfolio of studies.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Malaria continues to create a major health burden in the tropics especially in Africa. Introduction of Artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) has dramatically improved the outcomes of morbidity and mortality of malaria cases. Introduction of RDTs as well dramatically influenced cases detection hence treatment. The situation in Sudan is not different from the general picture in all Africa and witness great reduction of deaths from malaria since the introduction of ACT in 2005. The national protocol depends now on Giemsa stained slides microcopy or certified RDTs for diagnosis and ACT as first and second line of treatment.

Recommendation by World Health Organization (WHO) on parasitological confirmation of malaria cases by microscopy or rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) before treatment increased the use and availability of RDTs worldwide.

Rapid diagnostic tests, since their introduction in the late 90's, have dramatically improved our ability to control malaria. Most RDTs are based on histidine-rich protein 2 (PfHRP2) or lactate dehydrogenase (pLDH), which are present in Plasmodium falciparum only and all human-infecting Plasmodium species respectively. However, the gradual spread of hrp2/hrp3-deleted mutants in several endemic countries in South America, Asia and Africa exerts a substantial potential impact on the utility of HRP2-based RDTs for case management in these settings.

Plasmodium lactate dehydrogenase (pLDH), on the other hand, appears as a good alternative to HRP2 as it is an essential protein expressed by all human-infecting Plasmodium species; however, pLDH-based RDTs were shown to perform poorly at low parasitaemia, which is common among patients infected with P. vivax, P. malariae and P. ovale species as well as in asymptomatic infections. Therefore, it is less preferred in endemic-countries. In these settings, malaria microscopy holds its reign as the standard of reference thanks to its low direct cost and ability to detect, quantify, and differentiate malaria parasites. However, it is also labour-intensive, time-consuming and expertise-demanding.

With the aim of addressing these limitations, Abbott has developed novel malaria RDTs, namely; NxTekTM Malaria Pf/Pv Plus and NxTekTM Malaria Pf Plus. These may provide added value compared to currently available malaria RDTs, especially in settings where current tests prove to be insufficient due to hrp2 deletion or high burden of P. vivax malaria.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

4563

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Jakarta, Indonesia, 12870
        • Exeins Health Institute
      • Lima, Peru, 15102
        • Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia
      • Khartoum, Sudan
        • Institute of Endemic Diseases, Medical Campus

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

5 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with symptoms suggestive of malaria seeking clinical care in health facilities. By default, all such patients will be assessed for eligibility and, if appropriate, recruited in the study.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 5 years old or older
  • Presenting at the study site with fever or a history of fever during the preceding 48 hours
  • Freely agreeing to participate by providing informed consent (and assent, if applicable)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of symptoms and signs of severe illness and/or central nervous system infections as defined by WHO guidelines

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Point estimates of NxTekTM Malaria Pf Plus
Time Frame: 8 Months
Point estimates of diagnostic accuracy characteristics (sensitivity, specificity, NPV, PPV) with 95% confidence intervals for NxTekTM Malaria Pf Plus using the reference test (nPCR) as standard of truth for the detection of P. falciparum infections in patients with symptoms suggestive of malaria.
8 Months
Point estimates of NxTekTM Malaria Pf/Pv Plus
Time Frame: 8 Months
Point estimates of diagnostic accuracy characteristics (sensitivity, specificity, NPV, PPV) with 95% confidence intervals for NxTekTM Malaria Pf/Pv Plus using the reference test as standard of truth for the detection of P. falciparum and P.vivax infections in patients with symptoms suggestive of malaria.
8 Months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Point estimates of comparator tests
Time Frame: 8 months
Point estimates of diagnostic accuracy characteristics (sensitivity, specificity, NPV, PPV) with 95% confidence intervals of comparator tests using the reference test as standard of truth for the detection of P. falciparum and, P.vivax infections in patients with symptoms suggestive of malaria
8 months
Point estimates of index tests
Time Frame: 8 months
Point estimates of diagnostic accuracy characteristics with 95% confidence intervals (sensitivity, specificity, NPV, PPV) of the index tests for the detection of P. falciparum infections with hrp2 and/or hrp3 deletions in patients with symptoms suggestive of malaria.
8 months
User ability to read and interpret test
Time Frame: 8 months
2.4 Percent of end users who can accurately interpret the investigational device result output.
8 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 30, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 30, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

July 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 30, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 30, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

July 6, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 13, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 12, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MA016 Abbott

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Malaria

Clinical Trials on Rapid Diagnostic Test

Subscribe