Long Term Clinical and Radiographical Outcomes of Different Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Techniques
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Piero Agostinone, MD
- Phone Number: +39 3890260196
- Email: piero.agostinone@ior.it
Study Locations
-
-
-
Bologna, Italy, 40136
- Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients who underwent ACL reconstruction with single-bundle anatomical technique (patellar tendon, semitendinous and gracile tendons) or "Over-The-Top plus lateral plastic" technique and any associated procedures with at least 15 years of follow up;
- Patients aged between 15 and 50 at the time of surgery;
- Patients with isolated ACL tear;
- Patients with healthy contralateral knee at the time of surgery.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with grade III-IV chondral lesions according to Outerbridge scale at surgery;
- Patients no longer available;
- Women of childbearing age who cannot exclude pregnancy;
- Patients unable to give informed consent or patients unwilling to sign informed consent.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: HS
Patients who underwent anatomical single-bundle ACL reconstruction with hamstrings
|
Anatomical ACL reconstruction with quadruple-bundle hamstrings graft
|
|
Active Comparator: BPT
Patients who underwent anatomical single-bundle ACL reconstruction with patellar tendon
|
Anatomical single bundle ACL reconstruction with patellar tendon
|
|
Experimental: Over-the-top plus lateral plasty
Patients who underwent ACL reconstruction with Over-the-top plus lateral plasty technique
|
Non-anatomical ACL reconstruction, the hamstrings' tibial insertion is preserved; a double-bundle hamstring graft is passed intra-articularly, fixed in over the top position on the lateral femoral condyle, and then passed extra-articularly deeply to ileo-tibial band up to the tibia, where it is fixed at the level of Gerdy's tubercle.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
VAS pain
Time Frame: Two years
|
Numerical score to quantitatively assess the intensity of pain (0-10)
|
Two years
|
|
Kellgreen-Lawrence
Time Frame: Two years
|
Radiographical score that graded knee ostheoarthritis
|
Two years
|
|
Knee Laxity
Time Frame: Two years
|
Assessment of knee anterior posterior laxity and quantification of Pivot shift using measurement devices (KT-1000; Kira)
|
Two years
|
|
Failure and complications
Time Frame: Two years
|
Failures and complication rate for each arm of the study
|
Two years
|
|
Subjective and objective International Knee Documentation Committee
Time Frame: Two years
|
Clinical scores widely used to assess knee function and symptoms Values: 0 (worst score) to 100 (best score) for subjective IKDC; A (best score)-B-C-D (worst score) for objective IKDC (International Knee Documentation Committee)
|
Two years
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Short Form-36 Health Survey
Time Frame: Two years
|
SF-36 is a set of generic, coherent, and easily administered quality-of-life measures.
These measures rely upon patient self-reporting and are now widely utilized by managed care organizations and by Medicare for routine monitoring and assessment of care outcomes in adult patients.
|
Two years
|
|
Anterior knee pain
Time Frame: Two years
|
The patients will report in dicotomic way (yes/no) the presence/absence of pain referred to patello-femural joint.
|
Two years
|
|
Global satisfaction about the surgical procedure
Time Frame: Two years
|
The patients will report in dicotomic way (yes/no) if they are satisfied with the surgical procedure results
|
Two years
|
|
Tight circumference
Time Frame: Two years
|
Tight circumference measured 5 cm and 15 cm above the patella; it is a direct measurement of quadriceps trophism and indirectly explore the muscular status of affected limb.
|
Two years
|
|
Lysholm knee scoring scale
Time Frame: Two years
|
Clinical score used to assess knee function in context of ligamentary and meniscal lesions Values: 0 (worst score) to 100 (best score)
|
Two years
|
|
Tegner activity scale
Time Frame: Two years
|
Score that graded activity based on work and sports referred to knee status Values: 0 (worst score) to 10 (best score)
|
Two years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Stefano Zaffagnini, MD Prof, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Samuelsen BT, Webster KE, Johnson NR, Hewett TE, Krych AJ. Hamstring Autograft versus Patellar Tendon Autograft for ACL Reconstruction: Is There a Difference in Graft Failure Rate? A Meta-analysis of 47,613 Patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Oct;475(10):2459-2468. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5278-9.
- Getgood A, Hewison C, Bryant D, Litchfield R, Heard M, Buchko G, Hiemstra LA, Willits KR, Firth A, MacDonald P; Stability Study Group. No Difference in Functional Outcomes When Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis Is Added to Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Young Active Patients: The Stability Study. Arthroscopy. 2020 Jun;36(6):1690-1701. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.02.015. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
- Zaffagnini S, Marcheggiani Muccioli GM, Grassi A, Roberti di Sarsina T, Raggi F, Signorelli C, Urrizola F, Spinnato P, Rimondi E, Marcacci M. Over-the-top ACL Reconstruction Plus Extra-articular Lateral Tenodesis With Hamstring Tendon Grafts: Prospective Evaluation With 20-Year Minimum Follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2017 Dec;45(14):3233-3242. doi: 10.1177/0363546517723013. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
- Xie X, Xiao Z, Li Q, Zhu B, Chen J, Chen H, Yang F, Chen Y, Lai Q, Liu X. Increased incidence of osteoarthritis of knee joint after ACL reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts than hamstring autografts: a meta-analysis of 1,443 patients at a minimum of 5 years. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2015 Jan;25(1):149-59. doi: 10.1007/s00590-014-1459-3. Epub 2014 Apr 21.
- Mouarbes D, Menetrey J, Marot V, Courtot L, Berard E, Cavaignac E. Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Outcomes for Quadriceps Tendon Autograft Versus Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone and Hamstring-Tendon Autografts. Am J Sports Med. 2019 Dec;47(14):3531-3540. doi: 10.1177/0363546518825340. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
- Chen H, Liu H, Chen L. Patellar Tendon Versus 4-Strand Semitendinosus and Gracilis Autografts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials With Mid- to Long-Term Follow-Up. Arthroscopy. 2020 Aug;36(8):2279-2291.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.04.024. Epub 2020 May 7.
- Curado J, Hulet C, Hardy P, Jenny JY, Rousseau R, Lucet A, Steltzlen C, Morin V, Grimaud O, Bouguennec N, Pujol N, Sonnery-Cottet B, Graveleau N; French Society for Orthopaedic, Trauma Surgery (Societe francaise de chirurgie orthopedique et traumatologique, SoFCOT). Very long-term osteoarthritis rate after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: 182 cases with 22-year' follow-up. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2020 May;106(3):459-463. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.09.034. Epub 2020 Feb 1.
- Zaffagnini S, Marcacci M, Lo Presti M, Giordano G, Iacono F, Neri MP. Prospective and randomized evaluation of ACL reconstruction with three techniques: a clinical and radiographic evaluation at 5 years follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006 Nov;14(11):1060-9. doi: 10.1007/s00167-006-0130-x. Epub 2006 Aug 15.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- Long term ACLR
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.