Subcuticular Absorbable Staples Versus Conventional Skin Closure in Women Undergoing Cesarean Delivery
Subcuticular Absorbable Staples Versus Conventional Skin Closure in Women Undergoing Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Control Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Brett Goldman, MD
- Phone Number: 9542632359
- Email: brgoldma@utmb.edu
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Antonio Saad, MD
- Phone Number: 4097720982
- Email: afsaad@utmb.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Texas
-
Galveston, Texas, United States, 77555
- John Sealy Hospital at University of Texas Medical Branch
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18-50 years of age
- Women ≥ 24 weeks viable gestation
- Will be undergoing cesarean delivery
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patient unwilling or unable to provide consent.
- No or very limited prenatal care or a non-resident patient who is unlikely to follow-up after delivery.
- Immunosuppressed subjects: i.e., taking systemic immunosuppressant or steroids (e.g. transplant subjects; not including steroids for lung maturity), HIV with CD4 <200, or other
- Decision not to have skin closure (e.g. secondary wound closure, mesh closure)
- Current skin infection
- Coagulopathy
- High likelihood of additional surgical procedure beyond cesarean (e.g. scheduled hysterectomy, tubal ligation, bowel or adnexal surgery)
- Incarcerated individuals
- Intraamniotic infection
- Subjects participating on other treatment trials or studies that would interfere with the current study's primary outcome.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Suture wound closure
Absorbable sutures for closure of cesarean skin incision using Monocryl manufactured by Ethicon.
|
Under the skin suture placed by hand
|
|
Experimental: Absorbable staple wound closure
Staples will be applied as per the manufacturer's instructions intraoperatively using INSORB device manufactured by Cooper Surgical.
|
Under the skin stapling device that delivers absorbable staples
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Operating Time
Time Frame: Start of surgery through end of skin closure in minutes
|
Total time for the procedure
|
Start of surgery through end of skin closure in minutes
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Wound Cosmesis
Time Frame: Time of surgery through six weeks post partum
|
A digital photograph of the incision will be obtained on wound check visit POD 5-10 days.
Each photograph will be evaluated by independent blinded research staff using the Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale.These scores are totaled to obtain the final score.
The Stony Brook Scar Evaluation will score the scar from 0-5 where 5 shows significant healing.
|
Time of surgery through six weeks post partum
|
|
Number of Participants With Composite Wound Complication
Time Frame: Time of surgery through six weeks post partum
|
Hematoma, seroma, dehiscence, breakdown of wound, wound infection, endometritis, sepsis, post part fevers
|
Time of surgery through six weeks post partum
|
|
Post Operative Pain
Time Frame: 5-10 days
|
Analog pain scale ranging from 0-10. This is a standard question that nurses as during the post partum period while in the hospital and clinic/nursing visits. The numerical score will be recorded from the patient's chart. A score of 0 means no pain, and 10 means the worst pain. |
5-10 days
|
|
Number of Adverse Events
Time Frame: Time of surgery through six weeks post partum
|
Allergic reactions: anaphylaxis, angioedema, skin rashes, including Stevens Johnson and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis
|
Time of surgery through six weeks post partum
|
|
Use of Resources
Time Frame: Time of surgery through six weeks post partum
|
Postpartum clinic or emergency room visit within 30 days of delivery, need for imaging or other invasive procedures
|
Time of surgery through six weeks post partum
|
|
Skin Closure Time in Minutes
Time Frame: Time of surgery through six weeks post partum
|
The average of minutes it takes for closure of the skin at time of surgery through weeks post partum.
|
Time of surgery through six weeks post partum
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: George Saade, MD, Division Director/Co-PI
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Rousseau JA, Girard K, Turcot-Lemay L, Thomas N. A randomized study comparing skin closure in cesarean sections: staples vs subcuticular sutures. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Mar;200(3):265.e1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.01.019.
- Frishman GN, Schwartz T, Hogan JW. Closure of Pfannenstiel skin incisions. Staples vs. subcuticular suture. J Reprod Med. 1997 Oct;42(10):627-30.
- Gaertner I, Burkhardt T, Beinder E. Scar appearance of different skin and subcutaneous tissue closure techniques in caesarean section: a randomized study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008 May;138(1):29-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2007.07.003. Epub 2007 Sep 6.
- Pineros-Fernandez A, Salopek LS, Rodeheaver PF, Drake DB, Edlich RF, Rodeheaver GT. A revolutionary advance in skin closure compared to current methods. J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2006;16(1):19-27. doi: 10.1615/jlongtermeffmedimplants.v16.i1.30.
- Fick JL, Novo RE, Kirchhof N. Comparison of gross and histologic tissue responses of skin incisions closed by use of absorbable subcuticular staples, cutaneous metal staples, and polyglactin 910 suture in pigs. Am J Vet Res. 2005 Nov;66(11):1975-84. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.2005.66.1975.
- Nitsche J, Howell C, Howell T. Skin closure with subcuticular absorbable staples after cesarean section is associated with decreased analgesic use. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012 Apr;285(4):979-83. doi: 10.1007/s00404-011-2121-5. Epub 2011 Oct 30.
- Schrufer-Poland TL, Ruiz MP, Kassar S, Tomassian C, Algren SD, Yeast JD. Incidence of wound complications in cesarean deliveries following closure with absorbable subcuticular staples versus conventional skin closure techniques. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016 Nov;206:53-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.07.501. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 21-0045
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.